From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: "Rohit, Seth" <rohit.seth@intel.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:01:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4364296E.1080905@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051029184728.100e3058.pj@sgi.com>
Paul Jackson wrote:
> A couple more items:
> 1) Lets try for a consistent use of type "gfp_t" for gfp_mask.
> 2) The can_try_harder flag values were driving me nuts.
Please instead use a second argument 'gfp_high', which will nicely
match zone_watermark_ok, and use that consistently when converting
__alloc_pages code to use get_page_from_freelist. Ie. keep current
behaviour.
That would solve my issues with the patch.
> 3) The "inline" you added to buffered_rmqueue() blew up my compile.
How? Why? This should be solved because a future possible feature
(early allocation from pcp lists) will want inlining in order to
propogate the constant 'replenish' argument.
> 4) The return from try_to_free_pages() was put in "i" for no evident reason.
> 5) I have no clue what the replenish flag you added to buffered_rmqueue does.
>
Slight patch mis-split I guess. For the cleanup patch, you're right,
this should be removed.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: "Rohit, Seth" <rohit.seth@intel.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:01:18 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4364296E.1080905@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051029184728.100e3058.pj@sgi.com>
Paul Jackson wrote:
> A couple more items:
> 1) Lets try for a consistent use of type "gfp_t" for gfp_mask.
> 2) The can_try_harder flag values were driving me nuts.
Please instead use a second argument 'gfp_high', which will nicely
match zone_watermark_ok, and use that consistently when converting
__alloc_pages code to use get_page_from_freelist. Ie. keep current
behaviour.
That would solve my issues with the patch.
> 3) The "inline" you added to buffered_rmqueue() blew up my compile.
How? Why? This should be solved because a future possible feature
(early allocation from pcp lists) will want inlining in order to
propogate the constant 'replenish' argument.
> 4) The return from try_to_free_pages() was put in "i" for no evident reason.
> 5) I have no clue what the replenish flag you added to buffered_rmqueue does.
>
Slight patch mis-split I guess. For the cleanup patch, you're right,
this should be removed.
--
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-30 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-29 1:33 [PATCH]: Clean up of __alloc_pages Rohit, Seth
2005-10-29 1:33 ` Rohit, Seth
2005-10-29 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-29 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-31 20:55 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-31 20:55 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-01 1:14 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-01 1:14 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-04 18:15 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-04 18:15 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-05 0:00 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-05 0:00 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 0:16 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 0:16 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-31 19:09 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-31 19:09 ` Rohit Seth
2005-11-05 17:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-05 17:09 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-06 4:18 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-06 4:18 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-06 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-06 17:35 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-06 20:49 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-06 20:49 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 2:57 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 3:42 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-07 3:42 ` Andi Kleen
2005-11-07 4:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 4:37 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 6:08 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 6:08 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 9:46 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 9:46 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 10:17 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 10:17 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-07 14:41 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 14:41 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 3:44 ` Paul Jackson
2005-11-07 3:44 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 1:47 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 1:47 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:01 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2005-10-30 2:01 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:19 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:32 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:32 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 3:06 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 3:06 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 3:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 3:53 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:26 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 2:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 2:36 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 3:09 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 3:09 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 3:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 3:55 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-30 4:11 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-30 4:11 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-31 21:20 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-31 21:20 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-31 21:28 ` Paul Jackson
2005-10-31 21:28 ` Paul Jackson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-05 1:57 Seth, Rohit
2005-11-05 1:57 ` Seth, Rohit
2005-10-01 19:00 Seth, Rohit
2005-10-01 19:00 ` Seth, Rohit
2005-10-02 3:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-02 3:09 ` Nick Piggin
2005-10-03 16:50 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 16:50 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 15:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-03 15:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-03 16:55 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 16:55 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-03 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-10-03 17:48 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-03 17:48 ` Rohit Seth
2005-10-04 13:27 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-04 13:27 ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-04 16:26 ` Ray Bryant
2005-10-04 16:26 ` Ray Bryant
2005-10-04 16:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-04 16:10 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-10-04 17:02 ` Ray Bryant
2005-10-04 17:02 ` Ray Bryant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4364296E.1080905@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rohit.seth@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.