From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: sfrost@snowman.net, gcoady.lk@gmail.com, laforge@netfilter.org,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
marcelo@kvack.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:40:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060512124041.GA31714@w.ods.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490605120513w4b078642k816dfef6ab907823@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> >Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >> On 5/12/06, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I haven't seen any cleanup patches so far, so I think I'm
> >>> going to start my nth try at cleaning up this mess.
> >>> Unfortunately its even immune to Lindent ..
> >>>
> >>
> >> If you get too fed up with it, let me know, and I'll give it a go as
> >well.
> >
> >Thanks, I'm about half-way through (and about to kill someone),
> >just started with the biggest pile of crap (the match function)
> >and already noticed a possible endless loop within the first
> >couple of lines.
> >
> >Unfortunately this stuff is so unreadable that I'm not exactly
> >sure if the loop really won't terminate, an extra pair of eyes
> >would be appreciated.
> >
>
> Sure thing.
>
> I don't have time to look at it today (friends comming over for
> dinner), but I should have plenty of time for it tomorrow. So, if you
> could send me your patch once you are done for the day, then I'll look
> it over and see if I can find anything to add on top of your work (or
> have anything to comment on) and bounce it back to you sometime during
> tomorrow.
Please post it to the list, this coding style needs far more than two
pairs of eyes to be fixed. It has already discouraged several people,
the more we will be, the least pain we will feel :-)
Cheers
Willy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
sfrost@snowman.net, gcoady.lk@gmail.com, laforge@netfilter.org,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 14:40:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060512124041.GA31714@w.ods.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490605120513w4b078642k816dfef6ab907823@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:13:32PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 5/12/06, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> >Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >> On 5/12/06, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I haven't seen any cleanup patches so far, so I think I'm
> >>> going to start my nth try at cleaning up this mess.
> >>> Unfortunately its even immune to Lindent ..
> >>>
> >>
> >> If you get too fed up with it, let me know, and I'll give it a go as
> >well.
> >
> >Thanks, I'm about half-way through (and about to kill someone),
> >just started with the biggest pile of crap (the match function)
> >and already noticed a possible endless loop within the first
> >couple of lines.
> >
> >Unfortunately this stuff is so unreadable that I'm not exactly
> >sure if the loop really won't terminate, an extra pair of eyes
> >would be appreciated.
> >
>
> Sure thing.
>
> I don't have time to look at it today (friends comming over for
> dinner), but I should have plenty of time for it tomorrow. So, if you
> could send me your patch once you are done for the day, then I'll look
> it over and see if I can find anything to add on top of your work (or
> have anything to comment on) and bounce it back to you sometime during
> tomorrow.
Please post it to the list, this coding style needs far more than two
pairs of eyes to be fixed. It has already discouraged several people,
the more we will be, the least pain we will feel :-)
Cheers
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-12 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-07 2:26 [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter Jesper Juhl
2006-05-07 9:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-07 9:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-07 22:42 ` Grant Coady
2006-05-08 5:07 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-08 5:43 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-08 5:43 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-08 8:36 ` Amin Azez
2006-05-08 8:36 ` Amin Azez
2006-05-08 9:08 ` Juergen Kreileder
2006-05-08 9:08 ` Juergen Kreileder
2006-05-12 7:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 7:40 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 11:09 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-12 11:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 12:13 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-12 12:40 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2006-05-12 12:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-12 12:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 12:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 13:42 ` Amin Azez
2006-05-15 8:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 8:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 14:28 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 14:28 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 18:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 18:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 19:27 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 19:27 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 20:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 20:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 20:41 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 20:41 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 20:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 20:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 21:03 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-17 6:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-17 6:59 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-17 6:59 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-17 7:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-17 7:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-17 10:55 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-17 7:09 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-17 7:13 ` Roland Dreier
2006-05-17 7:19 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-17 13:14 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-17 13:14 ` Stephen Frost
2006-06-01 13:43 ` Andrew James Wade
2006-06-01 14:53 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-02 21:32 ` Andrew James Wade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060512124041.GA31714@w.ods.org \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gcoady.lk@gmail.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=sfrost@snowman.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.