All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: gcoady.lk@gmail.com, laforge@netfilter.org,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	marcelo@kvack.org, willy@w.ods.org,
	Amin Azez <azez@ufomechanic.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:45:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4468E84C.9000408@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060515204142.GO7774@kenobi.snowman.net>

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Patrick McHardy (kaber@trash.net) wrote:
> 
>>This is the updated patch, it changes the eviction strategy
>>to LRU and fixes a bug related to TTL handling, the TTL stored
>>in the entry should only be overwritten if the IPT_RECENT_TTL
>>flag is set.
> 
> 
> This looks like least-recently-added as opposed to least-recently-used
> (or, really, least-recently-updated).  Not sure how you move an entry in
> the lru list (perhaps just delete/add?) but I'm pretty sure
> recent_entry_update() needs to be modified to move the updated entry to
> the end of the list for correct operation.


Good point, I'll fix the patch.

> You also don't appear to check if 't' (the table following the
> recent_table_lookup() call) is valid in the 'match' (around
> line 191).  recent_entry_lookup() doesn't check that either.  It seems
> like you should be guarenteed to always get a table back but it might be
> prudent to check anyway.


It is guaranteed that we will get a valid table back, otherwise
there must be a serious bug somewhere else, in which case I
prefer to crash instead of hiding it away.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Amin Azez <azez@ufomechanic.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	willy@w.ods.org, gcoady.lk@gmail.com, laforge@netfilter.org,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, marcelo@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter
Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 22:45:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4468E84C.9000408@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060515204142.GO7774@kenobi.snowman.net>

Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Patrick McHardy (kaber@trash.net) wrote:
> 
>>This is the updated patch, it changes the eviction strategy
>>to LRU and fixes a bug related to TTL handling, the TTL stored
>>in the entry should only be overwritten if the IPT_RECENT_TTL
>>flag is set.
> 
> 
> This looks like least-recently-added as opposed to least-recently-used
> (or, really, least-recently-updated).  Not sure how you move an entry in
> the lru list (perhaps just delete/add?) but I'm pretty sure
> recent_entry_update() needs to be modified to move the updated entry to
> the end of the list for correct operation.


Good point, I'll fix the patch.

> You also don't appear to check if 't' (the table following the
> recent_table_lookup() call) is valid in the 'match' (around
> line 191).  recent_entry_lookup() doesn't check that either.  It seems
> like you should be guarenteed to always get a table back but it might be
> prudent to check anyway.


It is guaranteed that we will get a valid table back, otherwise
there must be a serious bug somewhere else, in which case I
prefer to crash instead of hiding it away.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-15 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-07  2:26 [PATCH] fix mem-leak in netfilter Jesper Juhl
2006-05-07  9:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-07  9:36   ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-07 22:42   ` Grant Coady
2006-05-08  5:07     ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-08  5:43       ` David S. Miller
2006-05-08  5:43         ` David S. Miller
2006-05-08  8:36         ` Amin Azez
2006-05-08  8:36           ` Amin Azez
2006-05-08  9:08           ` Juergen Kreileder
2006-05-08  9:08             ` Juergen Kreileder
2006-05-12  7:40         ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12  7:40           ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 11:09           ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-12 11:33             ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 12:13               ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-12 12:40                 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-12 12:40                   ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-12 12:49                   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 12:49                     ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-12 13:42               ` Amin Azez
2006-05-15  8:25                 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15  8:25                   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 14:28                   ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 14:28                     ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 18:49                     ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 18:49                       ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 19:27                       ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 19:27                         ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 20:09                         ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 20:09                           ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 20:41                           ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 20:41                             ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-15 20:45                             ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-05-15 20:45                               ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-15 21:03                             ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-17  6:26                               ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-17  6:59                                 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-17  6:59                                   ` David S. Miller
2006-05-17  7:19                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-17  7:19                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-17 10:55                                     ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-17  7:09                                 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-17  7:13                                   ` Roland Dreier
2006-05-17  7:19                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-17 13:14                                 ` Stephen Frost
2006-05-17 13:14                                   ` Stephen Frost
2006-06-01 13:43                                 ` Andrew James Wade
2006-06-01 14:53                                   ` Patrick McHardy
2006-06-02 21:32                                     ` Andrew James Wade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4468E84C.9000408@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=azez@ufomechanic.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gcoady.lk@gmail.com \
    --cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo@kvack.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=sfrost@snowman.net \
    --cc=willy@w.ods.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.