All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi@daemonizer.de>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	Gary Zambrano <zambrano@broadcom.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:09:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705281609.49859.maxi@daemonizer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705281216.51690.mb@bu3sch.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1893 bytes --]

On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Can you give 2.6.16 a try? The diff is not that big and we might
> be able to find out what broke if you find out 2.6.16 works.
> You can also try later kernels like .17, .18, .19 to further
> reduce the patch. (You could also git-bisect, if you have the time).
>
I did some testing and compiled some kernels and here are the results:

I was able to find out what causes the problems for me.  I did build two 
2.6.21.3 kernels, and one does work fine and the other doesn't.

This is a diff of the kernel configs I used:

--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.21.3-oldconfig1/.config  2007-05-28 13:41:15.000000000 
+0200
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.21.3/.config     2007-05-28 14:46:08.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # Automatically generated make config: don't edit
 # Linux kernel version: 2.6.21.3
-# Mon May 28 13:41:15 2007
+# Mon May 28 14:46:09 2007
 #
 CONFIG_X86_32=y
 CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
 #
 # General setup
 #
-CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-oldconfig1"
+CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=""
 CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO=y
 CONFIG_SWAP=y
 CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y
@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@
 #
 # Processor type and features
 #
-# CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT is not set
+CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
 # CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set
-# CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is not set
+CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
 # CONFIG_SMP is not set
 CONFIG_X86_PC=y
 # CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set

The -oldconfig1 is the kernel that had no problems and the other shows the b44 
problem. So if High Resolution Timer Support is disabled everything works 
fine and if I enable it the problems do appear again.

I didn't test this on my 2.6.22-rc3 kernel yet, but I guess disabling High 
Resolution Timer Support will also solve the problem there.

The older kernels I tried also work perfectly fine and they didn't have the 
High Resolution Timer Support yet.

Maxi

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maximilian Engelhardt <maxi-OwNUvPV92VfddJNmlsFzeA@public.gmane.org>
To: Michael Buesch <mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-wireless"
	<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger
	<shemminger-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
	<acme-f8uhVLnGfZaxAyOMLChx1axOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik-e+AXbWqSrlAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Gary Zambrano <zambrano-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Andrew Morton
	<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 16:09:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705281609.49859.maxi@daemonizer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705281216.51690.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1893 bytes --]

On Monday 28 May 2007, Michael Buesch wrote:
> Can you give 2.6.16 a try? The diff is not that big and we might
> be able to find out what broke if you find out 2.6.16 works.
> You can also try later kernels like .17, .18, .19 to further
> reduce the patch. (You could also git-bisect, if you have the time).
>
I did some testing and compiled some kernels and here are the results:

I was able to find out what causes the problems for me.  I did build two 
2.6.21.3 kernels, and one does work fine and the other doesn't.

This is a diff of the kernel configs I used:

--- /usr/src/linux-2.6.21.3-oldconfig1/.config  2007-05-28 13:41:15.000000000 
+0200
+++ /usr/src/linux-2.6.21.3/.config     2007-05-28 14:46:08.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #
 # Automatically generated make config: don't edit
 # Linux kernel version: 2.6.21.3
-# Mon May 28 13:41:15 2007
+# Mon May 28 14:46:09 2007
 #
 CONFIG_X86_32=y
 CONFIG_GENERIC_TIME=y
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
 #
 # General setup
 #
-CONFIG_LOCALVERSION="-oldconfig1"
+CONFIG_LOCALVERSION=""
 CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO=y
 CONFIG_SWAP=y
 CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y
@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@
 #
 # Processor type and features
 #
-# CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT is not set
+CONFIG_TICK_ONESHOT=y
 # CONFIG_NO_HZ is not set
-# CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is not set
+CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
 # CONFIG_SMP is not set
 CONFIG_X86_PC=y
 # CONFIG_X86_ELAN is not set

The -oldconfig1 is the kernel that had no problems and the other shows the b44 
problem. So if High Resolution Timer Support is disabled everything works 
fine and if I enable it the problems do appear again.

I didn't test this on my 2.6.22-rc3 kernel yet, but I guess disabling High 
Resolution Timer Support will also solve the problem there.

The older kernels I tried also work perfectly fine and they didn't have the 
High Resolution Timer Support yet.

Maxi

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-28 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-26  0:24 b44: regression in 2.6.22 Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-26  3:51 ` Gary Zambrano
2007-05-26 17:01 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-27 19:25   ` b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend) Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 19:25     ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 19:45     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-27 19:45       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-27 20:36       ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 20:36         ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 20:46         ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-27 20:46           ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-27 21:46           ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 21:46             ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 21:13     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-27 21:13       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-27 21:16       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-27 21:50         ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 21:50           ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 22:15       ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-27 22:15         ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28  0:24         ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28  0:40           ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28  0:40             ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28 10:16             ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 10:16               ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 14:09               ` Maximilian Engelhardt [this message]
2007-05-28 14:09                 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28 15:14                 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 15:14                   ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 15:32                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-28 15:32                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-28 15:43                     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 15:43                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 17:44                     ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28 19:23                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-28 20:55                         ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28 21:45                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-05-29 18:28                             ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-29 18:28                               ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-29 13:58                           ` Gary Zambrano
2007-05-29 13:58                             ` Gary Zambrano
2007-05-29 17:23                             ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-29 17:23                               ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-06-03 16:26                         ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-06-04  6:39                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04  6:39                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04 16:09                             ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-04 16:09                               ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-04 16:35                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04 16:35                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04 16:59                                 ` iperf: performance regression (was b44 driver problem?) Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-04 17:32                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04 17:32                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04 17:51                                     ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-04 19:00                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04 19:26                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04 19:26                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-06-04 19:32                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-06-04 19:47                                         ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-06-04 20:02                                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-06-04 20:52                                             ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-06-04 20:52                                               ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28 10:49             ` b44: regression in 2.6.22 (resend) Michael Buesch
2007-05-28 14:12               ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28 14:12                 ` Maximilian Engelhardt
2007-05-28 14:55                 ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-29 14:14                   ` Gary Zambrano
2007-05-29 20:45                     ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-29 20:45                       ` Michael Buesch
2007-05-29 21:01                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-29 21:01                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-05-29 21:05                       ` Gary Zambrano
2007-05-29 21:05                         ` Gary Zambrano
2007-05-29 22:39                         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-29 22:39                           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-29 21:36                           ` Gary Zambrano
2007-05-29 21:36                             ` Gary Zambrano
2007-05-30 10:45                             ` Michael Buesch
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-28 23:00 Uwe Bugla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200705281609.49859.maxi@daemonizer.de \
    --to=maxi@daemonizer.de \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zambrano@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.