Re: [PATCH] split realmode and loader routines out of startup.S

[Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>]

On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:32:28AM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote:
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (grub_linux_prot_size): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/loader.S (grub_linux_prot_size): ... here.
> 
> I would say:
> 
> (...): Moved from here...
> (...): ... to here.
> 
> Can you change that?

Ok (ACKed also for the next patch I already sent).

> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (grub_linux_tmp_addr): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/loader.S (grub_linux_tmp_addr): ... here.
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (grub_linux_real_addr): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/loader.S (grub_linux_real_addr): ... here.
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (grub_linux_boot_zimage): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/loader.S (grub_linux_boot_zimage): ... here.
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (grub_linux_boot_bzimage): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/loader.S (grub_linux_boot_bzimage): ... here.
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (grub_multiboot_real_boot): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/loader.S (grub_multiboot_real_boot): ... here.
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (grub_multiboot2_real_boot): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/loader.S (grub_multiboot2_real_boot): ... here.
> >
> > 	* kern/i386/realmode.S: New file.
> >
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (protstack): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/realmode.S (protstack): ... here.
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (gdt): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/realmode.S (gdt): ... here.
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S (prot_to_real): Moved to ...
> > 	* kern/i386/realmode.S (prot_to_real): ... here.
> >
> > 	* kern/i386/pc/startup.S: Include `kern/i386/loader.S' and
> > 	`kern/i386/realmode.S'.
> 
> Why include?  Can't it be linked?  That's what a linker is for :-)

Linking required wrapping a lot of references with EXT_C() macro, so I opted
for #include (note this is done for lzo1x.S already).

Also, #including stuff from the wrong [1] place caused cpu faults in my tests.
With my current patch, code doesn't change much its location (real mode stuff
at the beginning, loader stuff at the end).

[1] Sorry, I'm not sure what wrong means here.  Maybe it has to do with GAS
    syntax magic affecting cross-include borders or with a weird hardcoded
    reference to a specific memory layout.

-- 
Robert Millan

<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)