All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Mike Houston <mikeserv@bmts.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhoffman@lightlink.com,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.24-rc4 hwmon it87 probe fails
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:05:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071209000554.GF20441@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071204215154.7f26285e.mikeserv@bmts.com>

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:51:54PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
> I finally got around to testing Linux 2.6.24 (2.6.24-rc4) and found
> that the it87 driver fails to probe and consequently, my sensors no
> longer work. This was fine with Linux 2.6.23.8 (the last kernel I was
> using)
> 
> The necessary modules load, but:
> 
> it87: Found IT8718F chip at 0x290, revision 2
> it87: in3 is VCC (+5V)
> it87 it87.656: Failed to request region 0x290-0x297
> it87: probe of it87.656 failed with error -16
> 
> Coretemp still works.
> 
> It appears it has something to do with the ioport range being
> reserved for some reason:
> 
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x290-0x29f has been reserved
> 
> At least I don't see that happening on previous kernels.
> 
> In any case, the changes to it87.c itself don't appear to have caused
> this. (CC'd hwmon maintainer anyways, my apologies if that was
> inappropriate)
> 
> dmesg:
> http://www.mikeserv.com/temp/dmesg-2.6.24-rc4.txt
> 
> config:
> http://www.mikeserv.com/temp/config-2.6.24-rc4.txt

Thanks for your report.

Please also provide:
- dmesg from 2.6.23.8
- The output of "cat /proc/ioports" for both kernels

> Thanks for any help or suggestions,
> 
> Mike Houston

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Mike Houston <mikeserv@bmts.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhoffman@lightlink.com,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4 hwmon it87 probe fails
Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 01:05:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071209000554.GF20441@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071204215154.7f26285e.mikeserv@bmts.com>

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:51:54PM -0500, Mike Houston wrote:
> I finally got around to testing Linux 2.6.24 (2.6.24-rc4) and found
> that the it87 driver fails to probe and consequently, my sensors no
> longer work. This was fine with Linux 2.6.23.8 (the last kernel I was
> using)
> 
> The necessary modules load, but:
> 
> it87: Found IT8718F chip at 0x290, revision 2
> it87: in3 is VCC (+5V)
> it87 it87.656: Failed to request region 0x290-0x297
> it87: probe of it87.656 failed with error -16
> 
> Coretemp still works.
> 
> It appears it has something to do with the ioport range being
> reserved for some reason:
> 
> system 00:01: ioport range 0x290-0x29f has been reserved
> 
> At least I don't see that happening on previous kernels.
> 
> In any case, the changes to it87.c itself don't appear to have caused
> this. (CC'd hwmon maintainer anyways, my apologies if that was
> inappropriate)
> 
> dmesg:
> http://www.mikeserv.com/temp/dmesg-2.6.24-rc4.txt
> 
> config:
> http://www.mikeserv.com/temp/config-2.6.24-rc4.txt

Thanks for your report.

Please also provide:
- dmesg from 2.6.23.8
- The output of "cat /proc/ioports" for both kernels

> Thanks for any help or suggestions,
> 
> Mike Houston

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-09  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-05  2:51 2.6.24-rc4 hwmon it87 probe fails Mike Houston
2007-12-09  0:05 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-12-09  0:05   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-09  2:22   ` [lm-sensors] " Mike Houston
2007-12-09  2:22     ` Mike Houston
2007-12-09  9:50     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2007-12-09  9:50       ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-09 19:40       ` Mike Houston
2007-12-09 19:40         ` Mike Houston
2007-12-09 21:12       ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-09 21:12         ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-09 22:04         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-09 22:04           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-10  2:31           ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-10  2:31             ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-10  2:49             ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-10  2:49               ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-10  4:02             ` Mike Houston
2007-12-10  4:02               ` Mike Houston
2007-12-17  1:59               ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-17  1:59                 ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-17 17:14                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-17 17:14                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-18 17:59                   ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-18 17:59                     ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-20  0:20                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-20  0:20                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-20  0:45                       ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-20  0:45                         ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-20  2:13                         ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-20  2:13                           ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-20  2:17                           ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-20  2:17                             ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-21 19:00                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-21 19:00                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-21 19:50                       ` Mike Houston
2007-12-21 19:50                         ` Mike Houston
2007-12-22 11:21                       ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-22 11:21                         ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2007-12-22 11:21                         ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-23  3:40                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-23  3:40                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-23  9:28                           ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-23  9:28                             ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-23  9:28                             ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-23 23:14                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-23 23:14                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-23 23:14                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-25 21:31                               ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-25 21:31                                 ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-25 21:31                                 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2008-01-02 18:30                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-01-02 18:30                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-01-02 18:30                                   ` [lm-sensors] " Bjorn Helgaas
2008-01-12  9:49                                   ` Jean Delvare
2008-01-12  9:49                                     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2007-12-19 23:53               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-19 23:53                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-09 22:42         ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-09 22:42           ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-09 23:15           ` Mike Houston
2007-12-09 23:15             ` Mike Houston
2007-12-10  0:19           ` Mike Houston
2007-12-10  0:19             ` Mike Houston
2007-12-10  1:32             ` Ed Sweetman
2007-12-10  1:32               ` Ed Sweetman
2007-12-10 14:55               ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-10 14:55                 ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-10  1:10   ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Cormier
     [not found] <fa.QPUBl9Xd2PDsImgWn6hbR+ShV1U@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.ri5Klmu4+MwjYC8x5nSms+xKXfI@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.B/J+j9kGGZ1+gW9FrfHky+cj0Eo@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.Xv3BmMxnCGLOeEijySte5mKDO5k@ifi.uio.no>
2007-12-20  1:09       ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-20  1:09         ` Robert Hancock
2008-01-12  9:56         ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071209000554.GF20441@stusta.de \
    --to=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
    --cc=mikeserv@bmts.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.