All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ed Sweetman <safemode2@comcast.net>
To: Mike Houston <mikeserv@bmts.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Elvis Pranskevichus <el@prans.net>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
	mhoffman@lightlink.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.24-rc4 hwmon it87 probe fails
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:32:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <475C9739.4030306@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071209191959.eba5a41f.mikeserv@bmts.com>

Mike Houston wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 23:42:15 +0100
> Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:12:25 -0500, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>>> This indeed looks like a broken ACPI BIOS since the
>>> aforementioned commit touches only the PNP ACPI driver. I'm not
>>> sure how to work around this, though. Ideas?
>>>       
>> Complaining to Gigabyte seems to be the best approach.
>>     
>
> I just happen to have a Windows Vista installation on this box as
> well, and I just thought to check. Sorry, I wish I'd have thought of
> it sooner but I don't go there often. You folks might be interested
> to know that Windows appears to have the same silly problem with the
> i/o resources (from Device Manager):
>
> [000000290 - 000000294]  Motherboard resources
> [000000290 - 00000029F]  Motherboard resources
>
> I don't have anything that reads sensors in Windows though, so I
> couldn't tell you if it could access that it87 chip or not.
>
> So this pretty much confirms that it's a motherboard/bios issue.
>
> Mike Houston
>
>   

I'm seeing this exact problem on an Asus Nforce4 based board. Prior to 
moving to 2.6.24-rc4 it worked just fine.  No additional acpi options 
were selected in kernel config.  

So add Asus A8N-E to the list of broken pnpacpi


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ed Sweetman <safemode2@comcast.net>
To: Mike Houston <mikeserv@bmts.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Elvis Pranskevichus <el@prans.net>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
	mhoffman@lightlink.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>,
	Adam Belay <ambx1@neo.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.24-rc4 hwmon it87 probe fails
Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 20:32:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <475C9739.4030306@comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071209191959.eba5a41f.mikeserv@bmts.com>

Mike Houston wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Dec 2007 23:42:15 +0100
> Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Sun, 09 Dec 2007 16:12:25 -0500, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
>>     
>
>   
>>> This indeed looks like a broken ACPI BIOS since the
>>> aforementioned commit touches only the PNP ACPI driver. I'm not
>>> sure how to work around this, though. Ideas?
>>>       
>> Complaining to Gigabyte seems to be the best approach.
>>     
>
> I just happen to have a Windows Vista installation on this box as
> well, and I just thought to check. Sorry, I wish I'd have thought of
> it sooner but I don't go there often. You folks might be interested
> to know that Windows appears to have the same silly problem with the
> i/o resources (from Device Manager):
>
> [000000290 - 000000294]  Motherboard resources
> [000000290 - 00000029F]  Motherboard resources
>
> I don't have anything that reads sensors in Windows though, so I
> couldn't tell you if it could access that it87 chip or not.
>
> So this pretty much confirms that it's a motherboard/bios issue.
>
> Mike Houston
>
>   

I'm seeing this exact problem on an Asus Nforce4 based board. Prior to 
moving to 2.6.24-rc4 it worked just fine.  No additional acpi options 
were selected in kernel config.  

So add Asus A8N-E to the list of broken pnpacpi


  reply	other threads:[~2007-12-10  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-05  2:51 2.6.24-rc4 hwmon it87 probe fails Mike Houston
2007-12-09  0:05 ` [lm-sensors] " Adrian Bunk
2007-12-09  0:05   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-09  2:22   ` [lm-sensors] " Mike Houston
2007-12-09  2:22     ` Mike Houston
2007-12-09  9:50     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2007-12-09  9:50       ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-09 19:40       ` Mike Houston
2007-12-09 19:40         ` Mike Houston
2007-12-09 21:12       ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-09 21:12         ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-09 22:04         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-09 22:04           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-10  2:31           ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-10  2:31             ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-10  2:49             ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-10  2:49               ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-10  4:02             ` Mike Houston
2007-12-10  4:02               ` Mike Houston
2007-12-17  1:59               ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-17  1:59                 ` Shaohua Li
2007-12-17 17:14                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-17 17:14                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-18 17:59                   ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-18 17:59                     ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-20  0:20                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-20  0:20                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-20  0:45                       ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-20  0:45                         ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-20  2:13                         ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-20  2:13                           ` Elvis Pranskevichus
2007-12-20  2:17                           ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-20  2:17                             ` Carlos Corbacho
2007-12-21 19:00                     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-21 19:00                       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-21 19:50                       ` Mike Houston
2007-12-21 19:50                         ` Mike Houston
2007-12-22 11:21                       ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-22 11:21                         ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2007-12-22 11:21                         ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-23  3:40                         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-23  3:40                           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-23  9:28                           ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-23  9:28                             ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-23  9:28                             ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-23 23:14                             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-23 23:14                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-23 23:14                               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-25 21:31                               ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-25 21:31                                 ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-25 21:31                                 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2008-01-02 18:30                                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-01-02 18:30                                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2008-01-02 18:30                                   ` [lm-sensors] " Bjorn Helgaas
2008-01-12  9:49                                   ` Jean Delvare
2008-01-12  9:49                                     ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2007-12-19 23:53               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-19 23:53                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2007-12-09 22:42         ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-09 22:42           ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-09 23:15           ` Mike Houston
2007-12-09 23:15             ` Mike Houston
2007-12-10  0:19           ` Mike Houston
2007-12-10  0:19             ` Mike Houston
2007-12-10  1:32             ` Ed Sweetman [this message]
2007-12-10  1:32               ` Ed Sweetman
2007-12-10 14:55               ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-10 14:55                 ` Jean Delvare
2007-12-10  1:10   ` [lm-sensors] " Stephen Cormier
     [not found] <fa.QPUBl9Xd2PDsImgWn6hbR+ShV1U@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found] ` <fa.ri5Klmu4+MwjYC8x5nSms+xKXfI@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]   ` <fa.B/J+j9kGGZ1+gW9FrfHky+cj0Eo@ifi.uio.no>
     [not found]     ` <fa.Xv3BmMxnCGLOeEijySte5mKDO5k@ifi.uio.no>
2007-12-20  1:09       ` Robert Hancock
2007-12-20  1:09         ` Robert Hancock
2008-01-12  9:56         ` Jean Delvare

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=475C9739.4030306@comcast.net \
    --to=safemode2@comcast.net \
    --cc=ambx1@neo.rr.com \
    --cc=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=el@prans.net \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    --cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
    --cc=mikeserv@bmts.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.