From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: travis@sgi.com, mingo@redhat.com, davej@redhat.com,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue.
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:36:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090204073636.30f15339.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200902042111.35543.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:35 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 February 2009 13:31:11 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:14:31 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> > > I think you're right though: smp_call_function_single (or neat wrappers)
> > > where possible, work_on_cpu which can fail for the others, and we'll just
> > > have to plumb in the error returns.
> >
> > I bet a lot of those can use plain old schedule_work_on().
>
> Which is where work_on_cpu started: a little wrapper around schedule_work_on.
>
> We're going in circles, no?
No, we've made some progress. We have a better understanding of what
the restrictions, shortcomings and traps are in this stuff. We've
learned (surprise!) that a one-size-fits-all big hammer wasn't such a
great idea.
Proposed schedule_work_on() rule: either the flush_work() caller or the
callback should not hold any explicit or implicit sleeping locks.
Quick scan:
arch/x86/kernel/reboot.c:native_machine_shutdown()
I think this can/should continue to use set_cpus_allowed().
Although it could be converted to schedule_work_on(), as long as the
scheduler is still working properly at this time.
x86 microcode:
This code is just nuts. What's the point in pinning itself to a
CPU for the act of loading the microcode into main memory? It's only
the loading of the microcode which should care about which CPU
executes the code. ie: apply_microcode().
The code needs some laundering, switch to schedule_work_on().
Ensure that the callback functions don't take microcode_mutex.
arch/x86/kernel/apm_32.c:
It's a kernel thread. Add kthread_bind() to caller, done.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-centrino.c:
Switch to rdmsr_on_cpu() and friends
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k8.c
Could get similar treatment (needs new cpuid_on_cpu()?). Looks
like schedule_work_on() would be OK to use as well.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/speedstep-ich.c
Use rdmsr_on_cpu().
arch/blackfin/kernel/ipipe.c
Use kthread_bind()
arch/arm/mach-integrator/cpu.c
Not sure.
arch/sparc/kernel/us3_cpufreq.c
Use smp_call_function_single(). Write sparc64_get_clock_tick_on_cpu().
arch/sparc/kernel/us2e_cpufreq.c
Ditto
arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
If sun4v_mmustat_info() can be called from interrupt, use
smp_call_function_single(). Otherwise schedule_work_on().
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/rtasd.c
Ditto
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
Ditto
arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
Blah. Looks like schedule_work_on() will be OK.
arch/mips/kernel/traps.c
NFI what this does
arch/sh/kernel/cpufreq.c
schedule_work_on()
arch/ia64/sn/kernel/sn2/sn_hwperf.c
schedule_work_on()
arch/ia64/kernel/salinfo.c:
schedule_work_on()
arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c:
schedule_work_on()
arch/ia64/kernel/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:
schedule_work_on()
mm/pdflush.c:
wtf what the heck is all that stuff and who added it? weird.
Leave it alone I guess. Can admins manually move kernel threads to
other CPUs?
mm/vmscan.c:
switch to kthread_bind()
net/sunrpc/svc.c:
switch to kthread_bind()
kernel/kmod.c:
switch to kthreads, write then switch to kthread_bind_mask().
drivers/firmware/dcdbas.c:
smp_call_function_single()
drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_main.c:
kthread_bind()
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:
already done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-04 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 19:11 [PATCH 0/3] cpu freq: fix problems with work_on_cpu usage in acpi-cpufreq Mike Travis
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] work_on_cpu: dont try to get_online_cpus() in work_on_cpu Mike Travis
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue Mike Travis
2009-01-24 8:15 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <200901261711.43943.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
2009-01-26 7:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 18:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 20:43 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-26 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 21:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 21:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:50 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 23:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 0:42 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-26 22:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:15 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 22:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 21:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-26 22:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-26 23:01 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-27 0:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 7:15 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-27 17:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-01-27 7:05 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-27 7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-27 15:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-27 16:51 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-28 13:02 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-28 17:19 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-28 17:32 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-29 10:39 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-28 19:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-29 1:43 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-29 2:12 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30 6:03 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-30 6:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30 13:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-30 17:08 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-30 21:59 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-30 22:17 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-02 12:35 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-03 4:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 2:44 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-04 3:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 10:41 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-04 15:36 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-04 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-04 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-04 23:45 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-05 12:19 ` Pavel Machek
2009-02-05 17:44 ` Dmitry Adamushko
2009-02-10 8:54 ` Rusty Russell
2009-02-10 9:35 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-11 0:32 ` Rusty Russell
2009-01-16 19:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: use work_on_cpu in acpi-cpufreq.c for drv_read and drv_write Mike Travis
2009-01-16 23:38 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpu freq: fix problems with work_on_cpu usage in acpi-cpufreq [PULL request] Mike Travis
2009-01-17 22:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-19 17:11 ` Mike Travis
2009-01-19 17:26 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090204073636.30f15339.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.