From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:42:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206134253.GA9919@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206164546.6291.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:19:00PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > index 3859558..b6395ad 100644
> > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > * David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
> > */
> >
> > -#include <asm/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> this change break ia64 build perfectly.
> this patch seems don't tested at all.
>
> Ingo, I hope you ask patch author how to test posted patch ;-)
Patch author test the patch by adding it to a git tree that hits -next.
And this catched ths bug - so -next served its purpose.
Sam
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206134253.GA9919@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206164546.6291.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:19:00PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > index 3859558..b6395ad 100644
> > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > * David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
> > */
> >
> > -#include <asm/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> this change break ia64 build perfectly.
> this patch seems don't tested at all.
>
> Ingo, I hope you ask patch author how to test posted patch ;-)
Patch author test the patch by adding it to a git tree that hits -next.
And this catched ths bug - so -next served its purpose.
Sam
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206134253.GA9919@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206164546.6291.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 05:19:00PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > index 3859558..b6395ad 100644
> > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > * David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
> > */
> >
> > -#include <asm/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> this change break ia64 build perfectly.
> this patch seems don't tested at all.
>
> Ingo, I hope you ask patch author how to test posted patch ;-)
Patch author test the patch by adding it to a git tree that hits -next.
And this catched ths bug - so -next served its purpose.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-06 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-31 7:10 [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-31 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 6:30 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 17:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:31 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 18:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-02 17:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 18:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:55 ` Tony Luck
2009-02-05 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-05 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 2:06 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 2:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-06 2:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:18 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:34 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:00 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:11 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 18:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 19:31 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-08 5:50 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-09 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 8:19 ` [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 8:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 8:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 8:53 ` [PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 8:53 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 8:53 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 9:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 9:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:55 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:29 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:41 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:45 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:49 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:49 ` [PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:01 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:01 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:48 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:52 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:48 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:33 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:38 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:38 ` [PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:14 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:53 ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 18:53 ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 18:53 ` [PATCH] " Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 13:42 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2009-02-06 13:42 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 13:42 ` [PATCH] " Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090206134253.GA9919@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=cooloney@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.