From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:45:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206154539.GP18368@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206153315.GD13758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Index: b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > =================================> > > > > > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > > > * David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
> > > > > > */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -#include <linux/types.h>
> > > > > > +#include <asm/types.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No , we do not even need asm/types.h
> > > > >
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is not required
> > > > > for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > ok. I confirmed.
> > > > Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Jaswinder, mind adding these tags to the commit and sending a pull request
> > > with all fixes?
> >
> > The following changes since commit 0b86a4e34d885e734a4c4e46293376f3f1c639eb:
> > Ingo Molnar (1):
> > Merge branch 'core/header-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/.../jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip into core/header-fixes
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git core/header-fixes
> >
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
> > Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > make linux/types.h as assembly safe
>
> I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.
But have not replied to my mail about that so far.
Why is it wrong to make types.h an assembly-invariant? It is positively
helpful for mixed-mode headers and has no downsides whatsoever.
Ingo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:45:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206154539.GP18368@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206153315.GD13758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Index: b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > > > * David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
> > > > > > */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -#include <linux/types.h>
> > > > > > +#include <asm/types.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No , we do not even need asm/types.h
> > > > >
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is not required
> > > > > for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > ok. I confirmed.
> > > > Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Jaswinder, mind adding these tags to the commit and sending a pull request
> > > with all fixes?
> >
> > The following changes since commit 0b86a4e34d885e734a4c4e46293376f3f1c639eb:
> > Ingo Molnar (1):
> > Merge branch 'core/header-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/.../jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip into core/header-fixes
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git core/header-fixes
> >
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
> > Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > make linux/types.h as assembly safe
>
> I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.
But have not replied to my mail about that so far.
Why is it wrong to make types.h an assembly-invariant? It is positively
helpful for mixed-mode headers and has no downsides whatsoever.
Ingo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:45:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206154539.GP18368@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206153315.GD13758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 15:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Index: b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > ===================================================================
> > > > > > --- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > +++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > > > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> > > > > > * David Mosberger-Tang <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
> > > > > > */
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -#include <linux/types.h>
> > > > > > +#include <asm/types.h>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No , we do not even need asm/types.h
> > > > >
> > > > > Subject: [PATCH] Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is not required
> > > > > for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > ok. I confirmed.
> > > > Tested-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > > > Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Jaswinder, mind adding these tags to the commit and sending a pull request
> > > with all fixes?
> >
> > The following changes since commit 0b86a4e34d885e734a4c4e46293376f3f1c639eb:
> > Ingo Molnar (1):
> > Merge branch 'core/header-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/.../jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip into core/header-fixes
> >
> > are available in the git repository at:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaswinder/linux-2.6-tip.git core/header-fixes
> >
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
> > Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > make linux/types.h as assembly safe
>
> I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.
But have not replied to my mail about that so far.
Why is it wrong to make types.h an assembly-invariant? It is positively
helpful for mixed-mode headers and has no downsides whatsoever.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-06 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-31 7:10 [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-31 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 6:30 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 16:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 17:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:31 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 18:33 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-02 17:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 18:29 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:55 ` Tony Luck
2009-02-05 19:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-05 19:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 2:06 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 2:14 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-06 2:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:18 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:34 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:00 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:11 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 18:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 19:31 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-08 5:50 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-09 12:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 8:19 ` [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 8:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 8:19 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 8:53 ` [PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 8:53 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 8:53 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 9:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 9:11 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:55 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:29 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:41 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-06 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:45 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:49 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:49 ` [PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:01 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:01 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:48 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:52 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:48 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:33 ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:38 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:38 ` [PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:14 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:53 ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 18:53 ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 18:53 ` [PATCH] " Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 13:42 ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 13:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 13:42 ` [PATCH] " Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090206154539.GP18368@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=cooloney@kernel.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=jaswinderlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.