All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
	chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:01:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206160100.GS18368@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206154917.GE13758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>


* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:45:39PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
> > > >       Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > >       make linux/types.h as assembly safe
> > > 
> > > I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.
> > 
> > But have not replied to my mail about that so far.
> 
> Sigh.  No I didn't - because I also got a reply from Jaswinder and
> covered all points in _that_ reply.
> 
> Would you like me to re-send my reply so that you can appear in the To:
> header?
> 
> Stop making this discussion stupidly obtuse.

I am not making anything stupidly obtuse, your reply to Jaswinder was in a 
different (but related) portion of the thread, that i have not read yet at 
that point. I have read it now and have replied.

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
	chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:01:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206160100.GS18368@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206154917.GE13758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>


* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:45:39PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
> > > >       Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > >       make linux/types.h as assembly safe
> > > 
> > > I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.
> > 
> > But have not replied to my mail about that so far.
> 
> Sigh.  No I didn't - because I also got a reply from Jaswinder and
> covered all points in _that_ reply.
> 
> Would you like me to re-send my reply so that you can appear in the To:
> header?
> 
> Stop making this discussion stupidly obtuse.

I am not making anything stupidly obtuse, your reply to Jaswinder was in a 
different (but related) portion of the thread, that i have not read yet at 
that point. I have read it now and have replied.

	Ingo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	hskinnemoen@atmel.com, cooloney@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, dhowells@redhat.com, matthew@wil.cx,
	chris@zankel.net, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ia64 <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:01:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090206160100.GS18368@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090206154917.GE13758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>


* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 04:45:39PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 08:59:01PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput (2):
> > > >       Neither asm/types.h nor linux/types.h is required for arch/ia64/include/asm/fpu.h
> > > >       make linux/types.h as assembly safe
> > > 
> > > I continue to disagree with the need for the second patch.
> > 
> > But have not replied to my mail about that so far.
> 
> Sigh.  No I didn't - because I also got a reply from Jaswinder and
> covered all points in _that_ reply.
> 
> Would you like me to re-send my reply so that you can appear in the To:
> header?
> 
> Stop making this discussion stupidly obtuse.

I am not making anything stupidly obtuse, your reply to Jaswinder was in a 
different (but related) portion of the thread, that i have not read yet at 
that point. I have read it now and have replied.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-06 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-31  7:10 [git pull -tip] headers_check fixes for other architectures Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-01-31 16:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01  6:30   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 10:39     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 16:49       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-01 17:06         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:20         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-01 17:31           ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-01 18:33         ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-02 17:11         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:08           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-02 18:29             ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-02 18:48               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-05 17:55 ` Tony Luck
2009-02-05 19:06   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-05 19:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06  2:06       ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06  2:14         ` Mike Frysinger
2009-02-06  2:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:18           ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:21             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:34               ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 14:51                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 14:58                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:00                   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:10                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:56                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:02                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:24             ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:40               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:11               ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 18:42                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 19:31                   ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-08  5:50               ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-09 12:23                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06  8:19 ` [linux-next][PATCH] revert headers_check fix: ia64, fpu.h KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06  8:19   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06  8:19   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06  8:53   ` [PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06  8:53     ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06  8:53     ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06  9:11     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06  9:11       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-06 14:55       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:55         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 14:55         ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:29         ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:41           ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:33           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:33             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:45             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:45               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:45               ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:49               ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:49                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:49                 ` [PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:01                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-02-06 16:01                   ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:01                   ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 15:48             ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:52               ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:48               ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-02-06 15:55               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 15:55                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:12                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:12                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:23                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:23                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:33                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:33                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:33                       ` [PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 16:38                       ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:38                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 16:38                         ` [PATCH] " Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:14                         ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:14                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:22                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:22                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-02-06 17:32                 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:32                   ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 17:41                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 17:41                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-06 18:53     ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 18:53       ` Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 18:53       ` [PATCH] " Luck, Tony
2009-02-06 13:42   ` [linux-next][PATCH] " Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 13:42     ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-02-06 13:42     ` [PATCH] " Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090206160100.GS18368@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@zankel.net \
    --cc=cooloney@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
    --cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaswinderlinux@gmail.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.