From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:23:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228182313.GA28421@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090228095433.6af07a89@infradead.org>
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:54:33AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > > But here is the patch you asked for.
> > >
> > > Yes, this looks much more straightforward.
> > >
> > > And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially
> > > a 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_
> > > seccomp. It does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but
> > > it might not be used anywhere.
> >
> > It's enabled in SuSE kernels.
> >
>
> but are there users of it?
> I thought Andrea stopped the cpushare thing that was the only user of
> this....
I do not really know, but as it is enabled, we need to at least fix it.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:23:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228182313.GA28421@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090228095433.6af07a89@infradead.org>
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:54:33AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > > But here is the patch you asked for.
> > >
> > > Yes, this looks much more straightforward.
> > >
> > > And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially
> > > a 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_
> > > seccomp. It does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but
> > > it might not be used anywhere.
> >
> > It's enabled in SuSE kernels.
> >
>
> but are there users of it?
> I thought Andrea stopped the cpushare thing that was the only user of
> this....
I do not really know, but as it is enabled, we need to at least fix it.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:23:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090228182313.GA28421@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090228095433.6af07a89@infradead.org>
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:54:33AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800
> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > > > But here is the patch you asked for.
> > >
> > > Yes, this looks much more straightforward.
> > >
> > > And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially
> > > a 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_
> > > seccomp. It does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but
> > > it might not be used anywhere.
> >
> > It's enabled in SuSE kernels.
> >
>
> but are there users of it?
> I thought Andrea stopped the cpushare thing that was the only user of
> this....
I do not really know, but as it is enabled, we need to at least fix it.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-28 18:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-28 3:02 [PATCH 0/2] x86-64: 32/64 syscall arch holes Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 3:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86-64: syscall-audit: fix 32/64 syscall hole Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 3:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: " Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 3:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-28 3:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-28 4:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 7:25 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 7:25 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 7:25 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-28 7:36 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 7:36 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 7:36 ` Roland McGrath
2009-02-28 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-28 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-28 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-28 17:46 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2009-02-28 17:46 ` Greg KH
2009-02-28 17:46 ` Greg KH
2009-02-28 17:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-28 17:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-28 17:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-02-28 18:23 ` Greg KH [this message]
2009-02-28 18:23 ` Greg KH
2009-02-28 18:23 ` Greg KH
2009-02-28 20:27 ` Greg KH
2009-02-28 20:27 ` Greg KH
2009-02-28 21:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-28 21:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-02-28 21:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-03-02 1:44 ` Roland McGrath
2009-03-02 1:44 ` Roland McGrath
2009-03-02 1:44 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-06 18:42 ` Markus Gutschke
2009-05-06 18:42 ` Markus Gutschke
2009-05-06 18:46 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-06 18:46 `
2009-05-06 18:46 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-06 21:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 21:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 21:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 21:46 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-06 21:46 `
2009-05-06 21:46 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-06 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 22:08 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-06 22:08 `
2009-05-06 22:08 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-06 22:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 22:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 22:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-06 22:21 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-06 22:21 `
2009-05-06 22:21 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-07 4:23 ` Nicholas Miell
2009-05-07 4:23 ` Nicholas Miell
2009-05-07 4:23 ` Nicholas Miell
2009-05-07 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-07 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-10 5:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-10 5:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-10 5:37 ` Pavel Machek
2009-05-08 19:18 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-08 19:18 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-08 19:18 ` Andi Kleen
2009-05-07 7:03 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 7:03 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 8:01 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-07 8:01 `
2009-05-07 8:01 ` Markus Gutschke (顧孟勤)
2009-05-07 7:30 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 7:30 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 7:30 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 7:31 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 7:31 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 7:31 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-07 7:31 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-08 1:59 ` David Wagner
2009-05-10 5:36 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090228182313.GA28421@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.