From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE fixes
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:41:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200904222341.37846.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240430103.21848.101.camel@localhost>
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 21:55:03 Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 21:43 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > IMO we should just remove extra commas and add some whitespaces.
>
> Your choice.
> Ignore, reject, accept, improve, fine by me.
>
> > I have also more general (process oriented) comment:
> >
> > All patches have been posted to linux-kernel or linux-ide for review before
> > and it is _much_ more efficient to raise issues (including CodingStyle ones)
> > during "review phase" instead of during "push to Linus" phase.
>
> Maybe for you, but I'm an intermittent
> and random reader.
For everybody involved in the process -- this includes you.
I'm not the original author of many patches so I simply cannot be
correcting every single issue because:
a) it is physically impossible
b) it doesn't really educate people
Thanks,
Bart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-22 18:48 [git pull] IDE fixes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:06 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 19:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-22 19:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:55 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 21:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-04-22 22:02 ` Ray Lee
2009-04-22 22:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-07 12:44 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:40 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 15:03 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:11 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 14:57 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:18 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 15:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 17:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 19:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 20:39 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 21:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 17:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 18:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08 0:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-05-22 15:17 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:16 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-16 19:33 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-18 16:09 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-13 20:49 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 15:30 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 16:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-25 19:54 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-02 19:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-05 16:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-27 17:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-10 20:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-02 18:24 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-18 20:22 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-08 17:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200904222341.37846.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.