From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE fixes
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 19:55:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200906071955.42378.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020906070954p54cdfee4y62a51795be10b0d0@mail.gmail.com>
On Sunday 07 June 2009 18:54:08 Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Bartlomiej,
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <bzolnier@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Honestly, this should be solved on technical basis by somebody posting
> > needed libata patches instead of attempts to slow down IDE fixes.
>
> Nobody is "slowing down" IDE fixes here. Linus explicitly said that
> -rc8 is the last release candidate and the next one is going to be
> -final. There's absolutely _no way_ this series is appropriate at the
> very end of a release cycle.
My honest opinion is that it is as appropriate now as it will be 2.6.31.
[ I'm still amazed by the amount of *completely* bogus reasons given for
not merging it. ]
However it sure can wait, no big deal (though I still think that it was
worth to try to get it in and not make users wait another few months).
I'll let Linus decide and revise pull request if necessary.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-07 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-07 12:44 [git pull] IDE fixes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:40 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 15:03 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:11 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 14:57 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:18 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 15:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 17:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:08 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 19:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:07 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 20:39 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 21:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 17:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-06-07 18:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:00 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:25 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08 0:54 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 15:17 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:16 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-16 19:33 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 18:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:06 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 19:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-22 19:43 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:55 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 21:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:02 ` Ray Lee
2009-04-22 22:51 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-18 16:09 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-13 20:49 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 15:30 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 16:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-25 19:54 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-02 19:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-05 16:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-27 17:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-10 20:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-02 18:24 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-18 20:22 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-08 17:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200906071955.42378.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.