All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] IDE fixes
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:57:19 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906071651250.6847@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906080147.12274.bzolnier@gmail.com>



On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> This is not a new feature and basing your opinions on opinions of people
> who don't read the code before commenting is bad, really bad, m'kay?

The thing is, I had planned on doing a final release yesterday, even 
before your pull came in. I decided to hold off, let it be, just to test 
the _current_ state a bit more. No way am I then adding some effectively 
totally untested new code-path.

And if you start messing in partitions.c and adding whole new callback 
functions to generic block_device_operations, then that's a new code-path. 
The IDE subsystem has _no_ business adding random new callbacks in 
the very last days of a release.

It sure as hell is not just a bugfix, it's a new feature. The feature may 
be _needed_ for some specific bug report, but that is totally irrelevant. 
We don't do things like that.

It's also almost certainly not a regression, is it? So by no measure does 
it work as a "late in the -rc sequence" patch.

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-07 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-07 12:44 [git pull] IDE fixes Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:21 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:32   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 14:40     ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 15:03       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:11         ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 14:38   ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 14:57     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 15:18       ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 15:44         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:08           ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 17:47             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:08               ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 19:23                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:07                 ` Alan Cox
2009-06-07 20:39                   ` James Bottomley
2009-06-07 21:08                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 20:42                   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 16:54           ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 17:55             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 18:21               ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:00                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 19:09                   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-07 19:25                     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:15                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:47                         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:57                           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-06-08  0:54                             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-06-07 23:14               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-07 23:12       ` Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-05-22 15:17 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:16 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-16 19:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-16 19:33   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 18:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:06 ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 19:22   ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-04-22 19:43   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 19:55     ` Joe Perches
2009-04-22 21:41       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:02         ` Ray Lee
2009-04-22 22:51           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-22 22:58           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-04-18 16:09 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-13 20:49 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 15:30 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-03-05 16:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-25 19:54 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-02-02 19:48 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-01-19 12:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-22 22:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-12-08 16:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-10-05 16:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-27 17:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-10 20:47 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-09-02 18:24 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-18 20:22 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-07-08 17:38 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0906071651250.6847@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.