All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] page-allocator: Check zone pressure when batch of pages are freed
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:08:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100309100835.GA4883@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100309095342.GD8653@laptop>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:53:42PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Cool, you found this doesn't hurt performance too much?
> 

Nothing outside the noise was measured. I didn't profile it to be
absolutly sure but I expect it's ok.

> Can't you remove the check from the reclaim code now? (The check
> here should give a more timely wait anyway)
> 

I'll try and see what the timing and total IO figures look like.

> This is good because it should eliminate most all cases of extra
> waiting. I wonder if you've also thought of doing the check in the
> allocation path too as we were discussing? (this would give a better
> FIFO behaviour under memory pressure but I could easily agree it is not
> worth the cost)
> 

I *could* make the check but as I noted in the leader, there isn't
really a good test case that determines if these changes are "good" or
"bad". Removing congestion_wait() seems like an obvious win but other
modifications that alter how and when processes wait are less obvious.

> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:48:22AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > When a batch of pages have been freed to the buddy allocator, it is possible
> > that it is enough to push a zone above its watermarks. This patch puts a
> > check in the free path for zone pressure. It's in a common path but for
> > the most part, it should only be checking if a linked list is empty and
> > have minimal performance impact.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > ---
> >  mm/page_alloc.c |    3 +++
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 1383ff9..3c8e8b7 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -562,6 +562,9 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
> >  		} while (--count && --batch_free && !list_empty(list));
> >  	}
> >  	spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
> > +
> > +	/* A batch of pages have been freed so check zone pressure */
> > +	check_zone_pressure(zone);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int order,
> > -- 
> > 1.6.5
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] page-allocator: Check zone pressure when batch of pages are freed
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:08:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100309100835.GA4883@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100309095342.GD8653@laptop>

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:53:42PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Cool, you found this doesn't hurt performance too much?
> 

Nothing outside the noise was measured. I didn't profile it to be
absolutly sure but I expect it's ok.

> Can't you remove the check from the reclaim code now? (The check
> here should give a more timely wait anyway)
> 

I'll try and see what the timing and total IO figures look like.

> This is good because it should eliminate most all cases of extra
> waiting. I wonder if you've also thought of doing the check in the
> allocation path too as we were discussing? (this would give a better
> FIFO behaviour under memory pressure but I could easily agree it is not
> worth the cost)
> 

I *could* make the check but as I noted in the leader, there isn't
really a good test case that determines if these changes are "good" or
"bad". Removing congestion_wait() seems like an obvious win but other
modifications that alter how and when processes wait are less obvious.

> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:48:22AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > When a batch of pages have been freed to the buddy allocator, it is possible
> > that it is enough to push a zone above its watermarks. This patch puts a
> > check in the free path for zone pressure. It's in a common path but for
> > the most part, it should only be checking if a linked list is empty and
> > have minimal performance impact.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
> > ---
> >  mm/page_alloc.c |    3 +++
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > index 1383ff9..3c8e8b7 100644
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -562,6 +562,9 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int count,
> >  		} while (--count && --batch_free && !list_empty(list));
> >  	}
> >  	spin_unlock(&zone->lock);
> > +
> > +	/* A batch of pages have been freed so check zone pressure */
> > +	check_zone_pressure(zone);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int order,
> > -- 
> > 1.6.5
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-09 10:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08 11:48 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 13:35   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 13:35     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 14:17     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 14:17       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 15:03       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:03         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:42         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 15:42           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 18:22           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 18:22             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:38             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-10  2:38               ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 17:35         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:35           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:35           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-10  2:35             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:50   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 15:50     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 15:56     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 15:56       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 16:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 16:09         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:01         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:01           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:11           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:11             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:30             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:30               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] page-allocator: Check zone pressure when batch of pages are freed Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09  9:53   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09  9:53     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:08     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2010-03-09 10:08       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:23       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:23         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:36         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:36           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 11:11           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 11:11             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 11:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 11:29               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Put kswapd to sleep on its own waitqueue, not congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:00   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:00     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:21     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:21       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:32       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:32         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11 23:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Andrew Morton
2010-03-11 23:41   ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12  6:39   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12  6:39     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12  7:05     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12  7:05       ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 10:47       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 10:47         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 12:15         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12 12:15           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12 14:37           ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 14:37             ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-15 12:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 12:29               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 14:45               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 14:45                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 12:34             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 12:34               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 20:09               ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-15 20:09                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-16 10:11                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-16 10:11                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 17:42                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 17:42                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-22 23:50                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-22 23:50                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 14:35                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-23 14:35                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-23 21:35                   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-23 21:35                     ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-24 11:48                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 11:48                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:56                       ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-24 12:56                         ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-23 22:29                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-23 22:29                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24 14:50                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 14:50                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 12:22                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-19 12:22                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-19 21:44                         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-19 21:44                           ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20  7:20                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  7:20                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  8:54                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  8:54                               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20 15:32                             ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20 15:32                               ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20 17:22                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 17:22                                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21  4:23                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  4:23                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  7:35                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  7:35                                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21 13:19                                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21 13:19                                       ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-22  6:21                                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-22  6:21                                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 10:59                                         ` Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion that is protected tunable v2 Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 10:59                                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 11:59                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-26 11:59                                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-26 12:43                                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 12:43                                               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 14:20                                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-26 14:20                                                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-27 14:00                                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-27 14:00                                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  9:03                                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Johannes Weiner
2010-04-21  9:03                                     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-21 13:20                                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21 13:20                                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 14:40                           ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 14:40                             ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24  2:38                   ` Greg KH
2010-03-24  2:38                     ` Greg KH
2010-03-24 11:49                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 11:49                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 13:13                   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-24 13:13                     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-12  9:09   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12  9:09     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100309100835.GA4883@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.