All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@novell.com,
	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:20:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCEFBAB.4070403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BCE7DD1.70900@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 04/21/2010 12:23 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:

> IMHO it is fine to prevent that nightly backup job from not being
> finished when the user arrives at morning because we didn't give him
> some more cache

How on earth would a backup job benefit from cache?

It only accesses each bit of data once, so caching the
to-be-backed-up data is a waste of memory.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@novell.com,
	Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:20:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BCEFBAB.4070403@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BCE7DD1.70900@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On 04/21/2010 12:23 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:

> IMHO it is fine to prevent that nightly backup job from not being
> finished when the user arrives at morning because we didn't give him
> some more cache

How on earth would a backup job benefit from cache?

It only accesses each bit of data once, so caching the
to-be-backed-up data is a waste of memory.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-21 13:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08 11:48 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 13:35   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 13:35     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 14:17     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 14:17       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 15:03       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:03         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:42         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 15:42           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 18:22           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 18:22             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:38             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-10  2:38               ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 17:35         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:35           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:35           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-10  2:35             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:50   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 15:50     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 15:56     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 15:56       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 16:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 16:09         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:01         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:01           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:11           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:11             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:30             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:30               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] page-allocator: Check zone pressure when batch of pages are freed Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09  9:53   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09  9:53     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:08     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:08       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:23       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:23         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:36         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:36           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 11:11           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 11:11             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 11:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 11:29               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Put kswapd to sleep on its own waitqueue, not congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:00   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:00     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:21     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:21       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:32       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:32         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11 23:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Andrew Morton
2010-03-11 23:41   ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12  6:39   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12  6:39     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12  7:05     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12  7:05       ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 10:47       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 10:47         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 12:15         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12 12:15           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12 14:37           ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 14:37             ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-15 12:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 12:29               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 14:45               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 14:45                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 12:34             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 12:34               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 20:09               ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-15 20:09                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-16 10:11                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-16 10:11                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 17:42                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 17:42                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-22 23:50                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-22 23:50                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 14:35                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-23 14:35                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-23 21:35                   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-23 21:35                     ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-24 11:48                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 11:48                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:56                       ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-24 12:56                         ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-23 22:29                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-23 22:29                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24 14:50                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 14:50                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 12:22                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-19 12:22                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-19 21:44                         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-19 21:44                           ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20  7:20                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  7:20                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  8:54                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  8:54                               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20 15:32                             ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20 15:32                               ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20 17:22                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 17:22                                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21  4:23                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  4:23                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  7:35                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  7:35                                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21 13:19                                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21 13:19                                       ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-22  6:21                                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-22  6:21                                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 10:59                                         ` Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion that is protected tunable v2 Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 10:59                                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 11:59                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-26 11:59                                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-26 12:43                                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 12:43                                               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 14:20                                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-26 14:20                                                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-27 14:00                                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-27 14:00                                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  9:03                                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Johannes Weiner
2010-04-21  9:03                                     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-21 13:20                                   ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2010-04-21 13:20                                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 14:40                           ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 14:40                             ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24  2:38                   ` Greg KH
2010-03-24  2:38                     ` Greg KH
2010-03-24 11:49                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 11:49                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 13:13                   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-24 13:13                     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-12  9:09   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12  9:09     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BCEFBAB.4070403@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
    --cc=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@novell.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.