All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:56:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B966F93.9060207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003090946180.28897@router.home>



Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> index 30fe668..72465c1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ struct zone {
>>  	unsigned long		wait_table_hash_nr_entries;
>>  	unsigned long		wait_table_bits;
>>
>> +	/* queue for processes waiting for pressure to relieve */
>> +	wait_queue_head_t	*pressure_wq;
>> +
>>  	/*
> 
> The waitqueue is in a zone? But allocation occurs by scanning a
> list of possible zones.
> 
>> +long zonepressure_wait(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, long timeout)
> 
> So zone specific.
> 
>> -		if (!page && gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
>> -			congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
>> +		if (!page && gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
>> +			/* If still failing, wait for pressure on zone to relieve */
>> +			zonepressure_wait(preferred_zone, order, HZ/50);
> 
> The first zone is special therefore...
> 
> What happens if memory becomes available in another zone? Lets say we are
> waiting on HIGHMEM and memory in ZONE_NORMAL becomes available?

Do you mean the same as Nick asked or another aspect of it?
citation:
"I mean the other way around. If that zone's watermarks are not met, 
then why shouldn't it be woken up by other zones reaching their watermarks."


-- 

Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:56:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B966F93.9060207@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003090946180.28897@router.home>



Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> index 30fe668..72465c1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
>> @@ -398,6 +398,9 @@ struct zone {
>>  	unsigned long		wait_table_hash_nr_entries;
>>  	unsigned long		wait_table_bits;
>>
>> +	/* queue for processes waiting for pressure to relieve */
>> +	wait_queue_head_t	*pressure_wq;
>> +
>>  	/*
> 
> The waitqueue is in a zone? But allocation occurs by scanning a
> list of possible zones.
> 
>> +long zonepressure_wait(struct zone *zone, unsigned int order, long timeout)
> 
> So zone specific.
> 
>> -		if (!page && gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)
>> -			congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/50);
>> +		if (!page && gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
>> +			/* If still failing, wait for pressure on zone to relieve */
>> +			zonepressure_wait(preferred_zone, order, HZ/50);
> 
> The first zone is special therefore...
> 
> What happens if memory becomes available in another zone? Lets say we are
> waiting on HIGHMEM and memory in ZONE_NORMAL becomes available?

Do you mean the same as Nick asked or another aspect of it?
citation:
"I mean the other way around. If that zone's watermarks are not met, 
then why shouldn't it be woken up by other zones reaching their watermarks."


-- 

Grusse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2010-03-09 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-08 11:48 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] page-allocator: Under memory pressure, wait on pressure to relieve instead of congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 13:35   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 13:35     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 14:17     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 14:17       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 15:03       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:03         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:42         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 15:42           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 18:22           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 18:22             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:38             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-10  2:38               ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 17:35         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:35           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-10  2:35           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-10  2:35             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 15:50   ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 15:50     ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 15:56     ` Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
2010-03-09 15:56       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-09 16:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 16:09         ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:01         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:01           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:11           ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:11             ` Christoph Lameter
2010-03-09 17:30             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 17:30               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] page-allocator: Check zone pressure when batch of pages are freed Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09  9:53   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09  9:53     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:08     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:08       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:23       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:23         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:36         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:36           ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 11:11           ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 11:11             ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 11:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 11:29               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] vmscan: Put kswapd to sleep on its own waitqueue, not congestion Mel Gorman
2010-03-08 11:48   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:00   ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:00     ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:21     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:21       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-09 10:32       ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-09 10:32         ` Nick Piggin
2010-03-11 23:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Andrew Morton
2010-03-11 23:41   ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12  6:39   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12  6:39     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12  7:05     ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12  7:05       ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 10:47       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 10:47         ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12 12:15         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12 12:15           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-12 14:37           ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 14:37             ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-15 12:29             ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 12:29               ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-15 14:45               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 14:45                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 12:34             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 12:34               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-15 20:09               ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-15 20:09                 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-16 10:11                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-16 10:11                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 17:42                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-18 17:42                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-22 23:50                 ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-22 23:50                   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-23 14:35                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-23 14:35                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-03-23 21:35                   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-23 21:35                     ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-24 11:48                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 11:48                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 12:56                       ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-24 12:56                         ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-03-23 22:29                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-23 22:29                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24 14:50                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 14:50                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-04-19 12:22                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-19 12:22                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-19 21:44                         ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-19 21:44                           ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20  7:20                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  7:20                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  8:54                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20  8:54                               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-20 15:32                             ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20 15:32                               ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-20 17:22                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 17:22                                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21  4:23                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  4:23                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  7:35                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  7:35                                     ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21 13:19                                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21 13:19                                       ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-22  6:21                                       ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-22  6:21                                         ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 10:59                                         ` Subject: [PATCH][RFC] mm: make working set portion that is protected tunable v2 Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 10:59                                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 11:59                                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-26 11:59                                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2010-04-26 12:43                                             ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 12:43                                               ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-26 14:20                                               ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-26 14:20                                                 ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-27 14:00                                                 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-27 14:00                                                   ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-04-21  9:03                                   ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone pressure Johannes Weiner
2010-04-21  9:03                                     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-04-21 13:20                                   ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-21 13:20                                     ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 14:40                           ` Rik van Riel
2010-04-20 14:40                             ` Rik van Riel
2010-03-24  2:38                   ` Greg KH
2010-03-24  2:38                     ` Greg KH
2010-03-24 11:49                     ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 11:49                       ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-24 13:13                   ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-24 13:13                     ` Johannes Weiner
2010-03-12  9:09   ` Mel Gorman
2010-03-12  9:09     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B966F93.9060207@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.