All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic?
@ 2011-09-15 10:07 Paul Menzel
  2011-09-15 10:20 ` Paul Eggleton
  2011-09-15 15:51 ` Bernhard Guillon
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menzel @ 2011-09-15 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 269 bytes --]

Dear OE folk,


it is confusing for outsiders if oe.dev and OE classic are referring to
the same repository or not.

So we need to make up an official name for the old repository. oe.dev or
OE classic? I favor oe.dev, because it is shorter


Thanks,

Paul

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 205 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic?
  2011-09-15 10:07 How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic? Paul Menzel
@ 2011-09-15 10:20 ` Paul Eggleton
  2011-09-15 10:42   ` Koen Kooi
                     ` (2 more replies)
  2011-09-15 15:51 ` Bernhard Guillon
  1 sibling, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2011-09-15 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel

On Thursday 15 September 2011 11:07:48 Paul Menzel wrote:
> it is confusing for outsiders if oe.dev and OE classic are referring to
> the same repository or not.

I can see how people could be confused, so yes we probably ought to have just 
one name.
 
> So we need to make up an official name for the old repository. oe.dev or
> OE classic? I favor oe.dev, because it is shorter

oe-dev/oe.dev being a shortened "org.openembedded.dev" is kind of a relic of 
the old (was it bitkeeper or monotone?) days prior to git. The benefit of 
"classic" is it draws attention to the fact that it's deprecated, whereas to 
me, dev implies that's where development still occurs. So my personal vote is 
for OE-classic.

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic?
  2011-09-15 10:20 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2011-09-15 10:42   ` Koen Kooi
  2011-09-15 16:01   ` Phil Blundell
  2011-09-15 16:03   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2011-09-15 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Op 15-09-11 12:20, Paul Eggleton schreef:
> On Thursday 15 September 2011 11:07:48 Paul Menzel wrote:
>> it is confusing for outsiders if oe.dev and OE classic are referring
>> to the same repository or not.
> 
> I can see how people could be confused, so yes we probably ought to have
> just one name.
> 
>> So we need to make up an official name for the old repository. oe.dev
>> or OE classic? I favor oe.dev, because it is shorter
> 
> oe-dev/oe.dev being a shortened "org.openembedded.dev" is kind of a relic
> of the old (was it bitkeeper or monotone?) days prior to git. The benefit
> of "classic" is it draws attention to the fact that it's deprecated,
> whereas to me, dev implies that's where development still occurs. So my
> personal vote is for OE-classic.

OEbsolete :)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFOcdahMkyGM64RGpERAhgHAJ9WvlhqWWAmVJQlvUeqC4Ue6orxrACfSh09
gpzdp5Vipbbg5Znf6fca4MQ=
=31CR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic?
  2011-09-15 10:07 How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic? Paul Menzel
  2011-09-15 10:20 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2011-09-15 15:51 ` Bernhard Guillon
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Bernhard Guillon @ 2011-09-15 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel



On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:

> So we need to make up an official name for the old repository. oe.dev or
> OE classic? I favor oe.dev, because it is shorter
>

I vote for classic, because there is no more development at oe.dev

regards,
Bernhard



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic?
  2011-09-15 10:20 ` Paul Eggleton
  2011-09-15 10:42   ` Koen Kooi
@ 2011-09-15 16:01   ` Phil Blundell
  2011-09-15 16:03   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Phil Blundell @ 2011-09-15 16:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel

On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 11:20 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> oe-dev/oe.dev being a shortened "org.openembedded.dev" is kind of a relic of 
> the old (was it bitkeeper or monotone?) days prior to git. The benefit of 
> "classic" is it draws attention to the fact that it's deprecated, whereas to 
> me, dev implies that's where development still occurs. So my personal vote is 
> for OE-classic.

Agreed.  Or even "OE-legacy" or something.

p.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic?
  2011-09-15 10:20 ` Paul Eggleton
  2011-09-15 10:42   ` Koen Kooi
  2011-09-15 16:01   ` Phil Blundell
@ 2011-09-15 16:03   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Denys Dmytriyenko @ 2011-09-15 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: openembedded-devel

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:20:09AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> On Thursday 15 September 2011 11:07:48 Paul Menzel wrote:
> > it is confusing for outsiders if oe.dev and OE classic are referring to
> > the same repository or not.
> 
> I can see how people could be confused, so yes we probably ought to have just 
> one name.
>  
> > So we need to make up an official name for the old repository. oe.dev or
> > OE classic? I favor oe.dev, because it is shorter
> 
> oe-dev/oe.dev being a shortened "org.openembedded.dev" is kind of a relic of 
> the old (was it bitkeeper or monotone?) days prior to git. The benefit of 
> "classic" is it draws attention to the fact that it's deprecated, whereas to 
> me, dev implies that's where development still occurs. So my personal vote is 
> for OE-classic.

Seems like "OE classic" is already becoming a de-facto standard among 
developers...

-- 
Denys



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-15 16:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-15 10:07 How to call the old repository: oe.dev or OE classic? Paul Menzel
2011-09-15 10:20 ` Paul Eggleton
2011-09-15 10:42   ` Koen Kooi
2011-09-15 16:01   ` Phil Blundell
2011-09-15 16:03   ` Denys Dmytriyenko
2011-09-15 15:51 ` Bernhard Guillon

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.