From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not stall in synchronous compaction for THP allocations
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:00:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111115020009.GE4414@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111114160345.01e94987.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:03:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:01:56 +0000
> Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> > A 1000-hour compute job will have its pages collapsed into hugepages by
> > khugepaged so they might not have the huge pages at the very beginning
> > but they get them. With khugepaged in place, there should be no need for
> > an additional tuneable.
>
> OK...
It's good idea to keep it monitored. But I guess the reduced rate will
only materialize at temporary VM stress times.
> Fair enough. One slight problem though:
>
> akpm:/usr/src/25> grep -r thp_collapse_alloc_failed Documentation
> akpm:/usr/src/25>
I didn't fill that gap but I was reading the code again and I don't
see why we keep retrying for -EAGAIN in the !sync case. Maybe the
below is good (untested). I doubt it's good to spend cpu to retry the
trylock or to retry the migrate on a pinned page by O_DIRECT. In fact
as far as THP success rate is concerned maybe we should "goto out"
instead of "goto fail" but I didn't change to that as compaction even
if it fails a subpage may still be successful at creating order
1/2/3/4...8 pages. I only avoid 9 loops to retry a trylock or a page
under O_DIRECT. Maybe that will save a bit of CPU, I doubt it can
decrease the success rate in any significant way. I'll test it at the
next build...
====
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] migrate: !sync don't retry
For !sync it's not worth retrying because we won't lock_page even
after the second pass. So make -EAGAIN behave like -EBUSY in the !sync
should be faster. The difference between -EAGAIN and -EBUSY remains as
usual for the sync case, where -EAGAIN will retry, while -EBUSY will
not.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
---
mm/migrate.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 578e291..7d97a14 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -680,11 +680,7 @@ static int __unmap_and_move(struct page *page, struct page *newpage,
* For !sync, there is no point retrying as the retry loop
* is expected to be too short for PageWriteback to be cleared
*/
- if (!sync) {
- rc = -EBUSY;
- goto uncharge;
- }
- if (!force)
+ if (!force || !sync)
goto uncharge;
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
}
@@ -794,7 +790,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
rc = __unmap_and_move(page, newpage, force, offlining, sync);
out:
- if (rc != -EAGAIN) {
+ if (rc != -EAGAIN || !sync) {
/*
* A page that has been migrated has all references
* removed and will be freed. A page that has not been
@@ -874,7 +870,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(new_page_t get_new_page,
out:
unlock_page(hpage);
- if (rc != -EAGAIN) {
+ if (rc != -EAGAIN || !sync) {
list_del(&hpage->lru);
put_page(hpage);
}
@@ -934,11 +930,14 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from,
case -ENOMEM:
goto out;
case -EAGAIN:
+ if (!sync)
+ goto fail;
retry++;
break;
case 0:
break;
default:
+ fail:
/* Permanent failure */
nr_failed++;
break;
@@ -981,11 +980,14 @@ int migrate_huge_pages(struct list_head *from,
case -ENOMEM:
goto out;
case -EAGAIN:
+ if (!sync)
+ goto fail;
retry++;
break;
case 0:
break;
default:
+ fail:
/* Permanent failure */
nr_failed++;
break;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Do not stall in synchronous compaction for THP allocations
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 03:00:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111115020009.GE4414@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111114160345.01e94987.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:03:45PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 10:01:56 +0000
> Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> > A 1000-hour compute job will have its pages collapsed into hugepages by
> > khugepaged so they might not have the huge pages at the very beginning
> > but they get them. With khugepaged in place, there should be no need for
> > an additional tuneable.
>
> OK...
It's good idea to keep it monitored. But I guess the reduced rate will
only materialize at temporary VM stress times.
> Fair enough. One slight problem though:
>
> akpm:/usr/src/25> grep -r thp_collapse_alloc_failed Documentation
> akpm:/usr/src/25>
I didn't fill that gap but I was reading the code again and I don't
see why we keep retrying for -EAGAIN in the !sync case. Maybe the
below is good (untested). I doubt it's good to spend cpu to retry the
trylock or to retry the migrate on a pinned page by O_DIRECT. In fact
as far as THP success rate is concerned maybe we should "goto out"
instead of "goto fail" but I didn't change to that as compaction even
if it fails a subpage may still be successful at creating order
1/2/3/4...8 pages. I only avoid 9 loops to retry a trylock or a page
under O_DIRECT. Maybe that will save a bit of CPU, I doubt it can
decrease the success rate in any significant way. I'll test it at the
next build...
====
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] migrate: !sync don't retry
For !sync it's not worth retrying because we won't lock_page even
after the second pass. So make -EAGAIN behave like -EBUSY in the !sync
should be faster. The difference between -EAGAIN and -EBUSY remains as
usual for the sync case, where -EAGAIN will retry, while -EBUSY will
not.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
---
mm/migrate.c | 16 +++++++++-------
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 578e291..7d97a14 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -680,11 +680,7 @@ static int __unmap_and_move(struct page *page, struct page *newpage,
* For !sync, there is no point retrying as the retry loop
* is expected to be too short for PageWriteback to be cleared
*/
- if (!sync) {
- rc = -EBUSY;
- goto uncharge;
- }
- if (!force)
+ if (!force || !sync)
goto uncharge;
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
}
@@ -794,7 +790,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
rc = __unmap_and_move(page, newpage, force, offlining, sync);
out:
- if (rc != -EAGAIN) {
+ if (rc != -EAGAIN || !sync) {
/*
* A page that has been migrated has all references
* removed and will be freed. A page that has not been
@@ -874,7 +870,7 @@ static int unmap_and_move_huge_page(new_page_t get_new_page,
out:
unlock_page(hpage);
- if (rc != -EAGAIN) {
+ if (rc != -EAGAIN || !sync) {
list_del(&hpage->lru);
put_page(hpage);
}
@@ -934,11 +930,14 @@ int migrate_pages(struct list_head *from,
case -ENOMEM:
goto out;
case -EAGAIN:
+ if (!sync)
+ goto fail;
retry++;
break;
case 0:
break;
default:
+ fail:
/* Permanent failure */
nr_failed++;
break;
@@ -981,11 +980,14 @@ int migrate_huge_pages(struct list_head *from,
case -ENOMEM:
goto out;
case -EAGAIN:
+ if (!sync)
+ goto fail;
retry++;
break;
case 0:
break;
default:
+ fail:
/* Permanent failure */
nr_failed++;
break;
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-15 2:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-10 10:06 [PATCH] mm: Do not stall in synchronous compaction for THP allocations Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 10:06 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 10:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-11-10 10:38 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-11-10 10:51 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-10 10:51 ` Alan Cox
2011-11-10 12:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-11-10 12:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2011-11-10 14:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10 14:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-10 14:22 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 14:22 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 15:12 ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-10 15:12 ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-10 16:13 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 16:13 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 16:30 ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-10 16:30 ` Minchan Kim
2011-11-10 16:48 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 16:48 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-10 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-10 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-10 23:37 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-10 23:37 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-11 10:14 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 10:14 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 10:39 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-11 10:39 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-11 11:17 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 11:17 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 14:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-11 14:21 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-14 23:44 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-14 23:44 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-15 13:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 13:25 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 21:07 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-15 21:07 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-15 23:48 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 23:48 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-16 0:07 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-16 0:07 ` David Rientjes
2011-11-16 4:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-16 4:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-16 13:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-16 13:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-16 15:07 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-16 15:07 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-18 17:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-18 17:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-16 14:14 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-16 14:14 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 10:01 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-11 10:01 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-15 0:03 ` Andrew Morton
2011-11-15 2:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2011-11-15 2:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-15 2:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-15 2:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-15 15:01 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 15:01 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 15:00 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 15:00 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 13:07 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 13:07 ` Mel Gorman
2011-11-15 15:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-11-15 15:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111115020009.GE4414@redhat.com \
--to=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jweiner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.