All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] uprobes: teach handle_swbp() to rely on "is_swbp" rather than uprobes_srcu
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:22:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120405222203.GE19166@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com>

Currently handle_swbp() assumes that it can't race with unregister,
so it roughly does:

	if (find_uprobe(vaddr))
		process_uprobe();
	else
		send_sig(SIGTRAP);

This relies on the not-really-working uprobes_srcu code we are going
to remove.

With this patch we rely on the result of is_swbp_at_addr_fast(bp_vaddr)
if find_uprobe() fails.

If is_swbp == 1, then we hit the normal int3, we should send SIGTRAP.

If is_swbp == 0, we raced with uprobe_unregister(), we simply restart
this insn again.

The "difficult" case is is_swbp == -EFAULT, when we can't read this
memory. In this case I think we should restart too, and this is more
correct compared to the current code which sends SIGTRAP.

Ignoring ENOMEM/etc from get_user_pages(), this can only happen if
another thread unmaps this memory before find_active_uprobe() takes
mmap_sem. It would be better to pretend it was unmapped before this
insn was executed, restart, and get SIGSEGV.
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 2af458d..ed76ee5 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1538,14 +1538,26 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	struct uprobe_task *utask;
 	struct uprobe *uprobe;
 	unsigned long bp_vaddr;
-	int is_swbp;
+	int uninitialized_var(is_swbp);
 
 	bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs);
 	uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp);
 
 	if (!uprobe) {
-		/* No matching uprobe; signal SIGTRAP. */
-		send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0);
+		if (is_swbp > 0) {
+			/* No matching uprobe; signal SIGTRAP. */
+			send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Either we raced with uprobe_unregister() or we can't
+			 * access this memory. The latter is only possible if
+			 * another thread plays with our ->mm. In both cases
+			 * we can simply restart. If this vma was unmapped we
+			 * can pretend this insn was not executed yet and get
+			 * the (correct) SIGSEGV after restart.
+			 */
+			instruction_pointer_set(regs, bp_vaddr);
+		}
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
1.5.5.1


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] uprobes: teach handle_swbp() to rely on "is_swbp" rather than uprobes_srcu
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:22:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120405222203.GE19166@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com>

Currently handle_swbp() assumes that it can't race with unregister,
so it roughly does:

	if (find_uprobe(vaddr))
		process_uprobe();
	else
		send_sig(SIGTRAP);

This relies on the not-really-working uprobes_srcu code we are going
to remove.

With this patch we rely on the result of is_swbp_at_addr_fast(bp_vaddr)
if find_uprobe() fails.

If is_swbp == 1, then we hit the normal int3, we should send SIGTRAP.

If is_swbp == 0, we raced with uprobe_unregister(), we simply restart
this insn again.

The "difficult" case is is_swbp == -EFAULT, when we can't read this
memory. In this case I think we should restart too, and this is more
correct compared to the current code which sends SIGTRAP.

Ignoring ENOMEM/etc from get_user_pages(), this can only happen if
another thread unmaps this memory before find_active_uprobe() takes
mmap_sem. It would be better to pretend it was unmapped before this
insn was executed, restart, and get SIGSEGV.
---
 kernel/events/uprobes.c |   18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 2af458d..ed76ee5 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1538,14 +1538,26 @@ static void handle_swbp(struct pt_regs *regs)
 	struct uprobe_task *utask;
 	struct uprobe *uprobe;
 	unsigned long bp_vaddr;
-	int is_swbp;
+	int uninitialized_var(is_swbp);
 
 	bp_vaddr = uprobe_get_swbp_addr(regs);
 	uprobe = find_active_uprobe(bp_vaddr, &is_swbp);
 
 	if (!uprobe) {
-		/* No matching uprobe; signal SIGTRAP. */
-		send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0);
+		if (is_swbp > 0) {
+			/* No matching uprobe; signal SIGTRAP. */
+			send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0);
+		} else {
+			/*
+			 * Either we raced with uprobe_unregister() or we can't
+			 * access this memory. The latter is only possible if
+			 * another thread plays with our ->mm. In both cases
+			 * we can simply restart. If this vma was unmapped we
+			 * can pretend this insn was not executed yet and get
+			 * the (correct) SIGSEGV after restart.
+			 */
+			instruction_pointer_set(regs, bp_vaddr);
+		}
 		return;
 	}
 
-- 
1.5.5.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-04-05 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-05 22:20 [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] uprobes: introduce find_active_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:20   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] uprobes: introduce is_swbp_at_addr_fast() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 10:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 10:08     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 14:44     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 14:44       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 14:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 14:55         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 15:34         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 15:34           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 10:08           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-17 10:08             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-17 17:09             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 17:09               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 19:53               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-17 19:53                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] uprobes: teach find_active_uprobe() to provide the "is_swbp" info Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] uprobes: change register_for_each_vma() to take mm->mmap_sem for writing Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:22 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-04-05 22:22   ` [PATCH 5/6] uprobes: teach handle_swbp() to rely on "is_swbp" rather than uprobes_srcu Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:22   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 11:16 ` [RFC 0/6] " Ingo Molnar
2012-04-14 11:16   ` Ingo Molnar
2012-04-16 11:31   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-16 11:31     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-16 14:41     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 14:41       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 12:52       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-25 12:52         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-25 14:22         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 14:22           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 13:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-14 13:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-14 20:52   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 20:52     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 10:51     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 10:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 19:53       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 19:53         ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 21:48         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 21:48           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 23:44           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 23:44             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 10:16             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 10:16               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 21:47               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 21:47                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 10:14                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-20 10:14                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-20 10:16                   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-20 10:16                     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-20 18:58                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 18:58                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 18:37                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 18:37                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23  7:14                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  7:14                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  7:24                       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-23  7:24                         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-23  7:40                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23  7:40                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 17:29                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 17:29                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 19:18                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 19:18                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 20:50                               ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 20:50                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 21:25                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 21:25                                   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120405222203.GE19166@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.