From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:22:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120405222221.GF19166@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com>
Kill the no longer needed uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id code.
It doesn't really work anyway. synchronize_srcu() can only synchronize
with the code "inside" the srcu_read_lock/srcu_read_unlock section,
while uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() does srcu_read_lock() _after_ we
already hit the breakpoint.
I guess this probably works "in practice". synchronize_srcu() is slow
and it implies synchronize_sched(), and the probed task enters the non-
preemptible section at the start of exception handler. Still this is not
right at least in theory, and task->uprobe_srcu_id blows task_struct.
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 -
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 22 +++-------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 8379e37..90a1f1d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1592,7 +1592,6 @@ struct task_struct {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
struct uprobe_task *utask;
- int uprobe_srcu_id;
#endif
};
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index ed76ee5..221e670 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
#define UINSNS_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE/UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES)
#define MAX_UPROBE_XOL_SLOTS UINSNS_PER_PAGE
-static struct srcu_struct uprobes_srcu;
static struct rb_root uprobes_tree = RB_ROOT;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(uprobes_treelock); /* serialize rbtree access */
@@ -723,20 +722,14 @@ remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, loff_t vaddr)
}
/*
- * There could be threads that have hit the breakpoint and are entering the
- * notifier code and trying to acquire the uprobes_treelock. The thread
- * calling delete_uprobe() that is removing the uprobe from the rb_tree can
- * race with these threads and might acquire the uprobes_treelock compared
- * to some of the breakpoint hit threads. In such a case, the breakpoint
- * hit threads will not find the uprobe. The current unregistering thread
- * waits till all other threads have hit a breakpoint, to acquire the
- * uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed from the rbtree.
+ * There could be threads that have already hit the breakpoint. They
+ * will recheck the current insn and restart if find_uprobe() fails.
+ * See find_active_uprobe().
*/
static void delete_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
{
unsigned long flags;
- synchronize_srcu(&uprobes_srcu);
spin_lock_irqsave(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
rb_erase(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
@@ -1373,9 +1366,6 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struct *t)
{
struct uprobe_task *utask = t->utask;
- if (t->uprobe_srcu_id != -1)
- srcu_read_unlock_raw(&uprobes_srcu, t->uprobe_srcu_id);
-
if (!utask)
return;
@@ -1393,7 +1383,6 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struct *t)
void uprobe_copy_process(struct task_struct *t)
{
t->utask = NULL;
- t->uprobe_srcu_id = -1;
}
/*
@@ -1521,9 +1510,6 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
} else {
*is_swbp = -EFAULT;
}
-
- srcu_read_unlock_raw(&uprobes_srcu, current->uprobe_srcu_id);
- current->uprobe_srcu_id = -1;
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
return uprobe;
@@ -1664,7 +1650,6 @@ int uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT;
set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
- current->uprobe_srcu_id = srcu_read_lock_raw(&uprobes_srcu);
return 1;
}
@@ -1699,7 +1684,6 @@ static int __init init_uprobes(void)
mutex_init(&uprobes_mutex[i]);
mutex_init(&uprobes_mmap_mutex[i]);
}
- init_srcu_struct(&uprobes_srcu);
return register_die_notifier(&uprobe_exception_nb);
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 00:22:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120405222221.GF19166@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120405222024.GA19154@redhat.com>
Kill the no longer needed uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id code.
It doesn't really work anyway. synchronize_srcu() can only synchronize
with the code "inside" the srcu_read_lock/srcu_read_unlock section,
while uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier() does srcu_read_lock() _after_ we
already hit the breakpoint.
I guess this probably works "in practice". synchronize_srcu() is slow
and it implies synchronize_sched(), and the probed task enters the non-
preemptible section at the start of exception handler. Still this is not
right at least in theory, and task->uprobe_srcu_id blows task_struct.
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 -
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 22 +++-------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 8379e37..90a1f1d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1592,7 +1592,6 @@ struct task_struct {
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_UPROBES
struct uprobe_task *utask;
- int uprobe_srcu_id;
#endif
};
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index ed76ee5..221e670 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -38,7 +38,6 @@
#define UINSNS_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE/UPROBE_XOL_SLOT_BYTES)
#define MAX_UPROBE_XOL_SLOTS UINSNS_PER_PAGE
-static struct srcu_struct uprobes_srcu;
static struct rb_root uprobes_tree = RB_ROOT;
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(uprobes_treelock); /* serialize rbtree access */
@@ -723,20 +722,14 @@ remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, loff_t vaddr)
}
/*
- * There could be threads that have hit the breakpoint and are entering the
- * notifier code and trying to acquire the uprobes_treelock. The thread
- * calling delete_uprobe() that is removing the uprobe from the rb_tree can
- * race with these threads and might acquire the uprobes_treelock compared
- * to some of the breakpoint hit threads. In such a case, the breakpoint
- * hit threads will not find the uprobe. The current unregistering thread
- * waits till all other threads have hit a breakpoint, to acquire the
- * uprobes_treelock before the uprobe is removed from the rbtree.
+ * There could be threads that have already hit the breakpoint. They
+ * will recheck the current insn and restart if find_uprobe() fails.
+ * See find_active_uprobe().
*/
static void delete_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
{
unsigned long flags;
- synchronize_srcu(&uprobes_srcu);
spin_lock_irqsave(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
rb_erase(&uprobe->rb_node, &uprobes_tree);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uprobes_treelock, flags);
@@ -1373,9 +1366,6 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struct *t)
{
struct uprobe_task *utask = t->utask;
- if (t->uprobe_srcu_id != -1)
- srcu_read_unlock_raw(&uprobes_srcu, t->uprobe_srcu_id);
-
if (!utask)
return;
@@ -1393,7 +1383,6 @@ void uprobe_free_utask(struct task_struct *t)
void uprobe_copy_process(struct task_struct *t)
{
t->utask = NULL;
- t->uprobe_srcu_id = -1;
}
/*
@@ -1521,9 +1510,6 @@ static struct uprobe *find_active_uprobe(unsigned long bp_vaddr, int *is_swbp)
} else {
*is_swbp = -EFAULT;
}
-
- srcu_read_unlock_raw(&uprobes_srcu, current->uprobe_srcu_id);
- current->uprobe_srcu_id = -1;
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
return uprobe;
@@ -1664,7 +1650,6 @@ int uprobe_pre_sstep_notifier(struct pt_regs *regs)
utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT;
set_thread_flag(TIF_UPROBE);
- current->uprobe_srcu_id = srcu_read_lock_raw(&uprobes_srcu);
return 1;
}
@@ -1699,7 +1684,6 @@ static int __init init_uprobes(void)
mutex_init(&uprobes_mutex[i]);
mutex_init(&uprobes_mmap_mutex[i]);
}
- init_srcu_struct(&uprobes_srcu);
return register_die_notifier(&uprobe_exception_nb);
}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-05 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-05 22:20 [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] uprobes: introduce find_active_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] uprobes: introduce is_swbp_at_addr_fast() Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 14:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 14:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 14:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 15:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-17 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-17 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 17:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-17 19:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-17 19:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] uprobes: teach find_active_uprobe() to provide the "is_swbp" info Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] uprobes: change register_for_each_vma() to take mm->mmap_sem for writing Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] uprobes: teach handle_swbp() to rely on "is_swbp" rather than uprobes_srcu Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-05 22:22 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-04-05 22:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 11:16 ` [RFC 0/6] " Ingo Molnar
2012-04-14 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2012-04-16 11:31 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-16 11:31 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-16 14:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 14:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 12:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-25 12:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-25 14:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-25 14:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 13:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-14 13:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-14 20:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-14 20:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 10:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 19:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 19:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 21:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 21:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-15 23:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-15 23:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-16 21:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-16 21:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-20 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-20 10:16 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-20 10:16 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-20 18:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 18:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-20 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 7:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 7:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-23 7:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-04-23 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 17:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 17:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-04-23 20:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 20:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 21:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-04-23 21:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120405222221.GF19166@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jkenisto@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.