From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:07:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205292107.42337.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC51418.5000104@candelatech.com>
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 08:23:20 PM Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 08:08 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 05/26/2012 09:39 AM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> We started testing with two AR9380 NICs today (one AP, the other STA).
> I applied Felix's skb optimization patch, and the ath9k memleak fix patch
> on top of 3.3.7+.
>
> The system has 2GB RAM, but it is 32-bit kernel, so not all
> is available to the networking code... That said, the OOM
> killer kills VNC and such.
>
> Anyway, I'll try some memleak debugging to see if
> I can find any leaks. It seems to me that we should
> not actually OOM just by trying to transmit too fast
> on a station interface :P
well, there's that:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.ath9k.devel/8233
It might not fix the bug, but it can save you time to confirm
that is not related to this particular skb leak.
Regards,
Chr
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 21:07:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201205292107.42337.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FC51418.5000104@candelatech.com>
On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 08:23:20 PM Ben Greear wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 08:08 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 05/26/2012 09:39 AM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> We started testing with two AR9380 NICs today (one AP, the other STA).
> I applied Felix's skb optimization patch, and the ath9k memleak fix patch
> on top of 3.3.7+.
>
> The system has 2GB RAM, but it is 32-bit kernel, so not all
> is available to the networking code... That said, the OOM
> killer kills VNC and such.
>
> Anyway, I'll try some memleak debugging to see if
> I can find any leaks. It seems to me that we should
> not actually OOM just by trying to transmit too fast
> on a station interface :P
well, there's that:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.ath9k.devel/8233
It might not fix the bug, but it can save you time to confirm
that is not related to this particular skb leak.
Regards,
Chr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 3:17 [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:17 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 3:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 5:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Joe Semler
2012-05-26 5:48 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 7:55 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-29 10:24 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 16:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 15:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-27 15:08 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 16:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Peter Stuge
2012-05-27 17:38 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 18:14 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 18:14 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:15 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-28 3:55 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-28 3:55 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-28 6:50 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 6:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 7:15 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 7:15 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 20:07 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 20:07 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 22:31 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-31 22:31 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 8:14 ` [ath9k-devel] " Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 8:14 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 10:09 ` [ath9k-devel] " Peter Stuge
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 2:05 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:05 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-15 21:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stephen Donecker
2012-06-16 21:03 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-20 2:20 ` Stephen Donecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201205292107.42337.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.