From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:58:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC4ABDF.7060105@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPsaeQNwWmAyzgGa3KjVv=nzwL3QHCDN-kHtaQWxKHOS4P+paA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-05-29 12:24 PM, Josef Semler wrote:
>
>
> 2012/5/26 Adrian Chadd <adrian at freebsd.org <mailto:adrian@freebsd.org>>
>
> Hi,
>
> If the device EEPROM states that it's a 2x2/3x3 device, it'll TX on
> two/three streams.
>
> If it's something like an AR9281 where it's physically a 1T2R stream
> device, that's what it'll transmit/receive on by default.
>
> If it's something like an AR9285 where it's physically a 1T1R stream
> device with antenna diversity, that's also what you get.
>
> If the device EEPROM lies though, well, that's a problem. :-)
>
> Installed OpenWRT f?r ubnt-nano on a Nanobridge. Well, NanoBridge should
> be 2x2 MIMO, but the device shows me AR7240 rev.2
> Is this a a EEPROM-lie and how can I correct it?
AR7240 is the CPU, not the wifi chip.
- Felix
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
To: Josef Semler <josef.semler@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 12:58:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC4ABDF.7060105@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPsaeQNwWmAyzgGa3KjVv=nzwL3QHCDN-kHtaQWxKHOS4P+paA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2012-05-29 12:24 PM, Josef Semler wrote:
>
>
> 2012/5/26 Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org <mailto:adrian@freebsd.org>>
>
> Hi,
>
> If the device EEPROM states that it's a 2x2/3x3 device, it'll TX on
> two/three streams.
>
> If it's something like an AR9281 where it's physically a 1T2R stream
> device, that's what it'll transmit/receive on by default.
>
> If it's something like an AR9285 where it's physically a 1T1R stream
> device with antenna diversity, that's also what you get.
>
> If the device EEPROM lies though, well, that's a problem. :-)
>
> Installed OpenWRT für ubnt-nano on a Nanobridge. Well, NanoBridge should
> be 2x2 MIMO, but the device shows me AR7240 rev.2
> Is this a a EEPROM-lie and how can I correct it?
AR7240 is the CPU, not the wifi chip.
- Felix
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-29 10:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 3:17 [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:17 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 3:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 5:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Joe Semler
2012-05-26 5:48 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 7:55 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-29 10:24 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau [this message]
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 16:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 15:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-27 15:08 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 16:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Peter Stuge
2012-05-27 17:38 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 18:14 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 18:14 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:15 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-28 3:55 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-28 3:55 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-28 6:50 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 6:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 7:15 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 7:15 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 20:07 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 20:07 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 22:31 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-31 22:31 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 8:14 ` [ath9k-devel] " Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 8:14 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 10:09 ` [ath9k-devel] " Peter Stuge
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 2:05 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:05 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-15 21:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stephen Donecker
2012-06-16 21:03 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-20 2:20 ` Stephen Donecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC4ABDF.7060105@openwrt.org \
--to=nbd@openwrt.org \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.