All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:31:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC7F14F.3020608@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmok8oK6G1U2GR074n3QWJUr924WitP4Xn47wG6k95msfDA@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/31/2012 12:24 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. yup, I got it to 250MBit UDP. :-)
>
> It turns out that (at least in FreeBSD-9), the scheduler and sleep
> state behaviour when doing adaptive power save/sleep state (ie,
> adaptive CPU speed changes, going into C2) is enough to negatively
> impact my iperf and ath/net80211 taskqueue scheduling.
>
> When I nail it back up to C1, fixed speed - everything is perfectly fine.
>
> I'll go and do some further digging into this, but it's good to see
> that I can squeeze decently high throughput out of the 2x2 NICs.

I'm getting right at 250Mbps of UDP payload received when
using a 2x2 AR9382 NIC (WPEA-121N) in a Lenovo X220i (with hacked white-listed BIOS).
AP is a 3x3 AR9380 NIC (WPEA_127N) in Atom based network appliance.

Open-air connection, about 3 feet apart.  This is in
the 'download' direction:  Wired to Station.  HT-40 on 5Ghz.

The rates bounce around a bit...down to 240Mbps or so for a bit, then
back to 250Mbps.  Might be some other interference around as this is
a relatively noisy environment...

Upload speed seems to be a constant 243Mbps..at least at this moment.

Kernel is 3.3.7+.


Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>
Subject: Re: Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 15:31:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC7F14F.3020608@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmok8oK6G1U2GR074n3QWJUr924WitP4Xn47wG6k95msfDA@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/31/2012 12:24 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. yup, I got it to 250MBit UDP. :-)
>
> It turns out that (at least in FreeBSD-9), the scheduler and sleep
> state behaviour when doing adaptive power save/sleep state (ie,
> adaptive CPU speed changes, going into C2) is enough to negatively
> impact my iperf and ath/net80211 taskqueue scheduling.
>
> When I nail it back up to C1, fixed speed - everything is perfectly fine.
>
> I'll go and do some further digging into this, but it's good to see
> that I can squeeze decently high throughput out of the 2x2 NICs.

I'm getting right at 250Mbps of UDP payload received when
using a 2x2 AR9382 NIC (WPEA-121N) in a Lenovo X220i (with hacked white-listed BIOS).
AP is a 3x3 AR9380 NIC (WPEA_127N) in Atom based network appliance.

Open-air connection, about 3 feet apart.  This is in
the 'download' direction:  Wired to Station.  HT-40 on 5Ghz.

The rates bounce around a bit...down to 240Mbps or so for a bit, then
back to 250Mbps.  Might be some other interference around as this is
a relatively noisy environment...

Upload speed seems to be a constant 243Mbps..at least at this moment.

Kernel is 3.3.7+.


Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-31 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-26  3:17 [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? Ben Greear
2012-05-26  3:17 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26  3:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26  3:24   ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26  5:48   ` [ath9k-devel] " Joe Semler
2012-05-26  5:48     ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26  7:43     ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26  7:43       ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26  7:55       ` Josef Semler
2012-05-26 11:28         ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 11:28           ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 12:35         ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 12:35           ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 17:15           ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:15             ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:50             ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-26 17:50               ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-29 10:24               ` Josef Semler
2012-05-29 10:58                 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-29 10:58                   ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27             ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27               ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 15:37   ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 15:37     ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 16:24     ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:24       ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39       ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39         ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 15:08         ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-27 15:08           ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 16:48           ` [ath9k-devel] " Peter Stuge
2012-05-27 17:38             ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40           ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40             ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 18:14             ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 18:14               ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:15               ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:15                 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:29                 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:29                   ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-28  3:55             ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-28  3:55               ` Ben Greear
2012-05-28  6:50               ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28  6:50                 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28  7:15                 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28  7:15                   ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 20:07                   ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 20:07                     ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24                     ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24                       ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 22:31                       ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-05-31 22:31                         ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23           ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23             ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:07             ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:07               ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:19               ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:19                 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30  0:06               ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30  0:06                 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30  3:22                 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30  3:22                   ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30  3:47                   ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30  3:47                     ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31  2:29             ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-31  2:29               ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 17:58     ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-26 17:58       ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29  8:14       ` [ath9k-devel] " Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29  8:14         ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 10:09         ` [ath9k-devel] " Peter Stuge
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-26 17:56   ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27  2:05   ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27  2:05     ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27  2:09     ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27  2:09       ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27  2:16       ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27  2:16         ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27  2:23         ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27  2:23           ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 11:30       ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 11:30         ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 12:32       ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:32         ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31     ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31       ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-15 21:08   ` [ath9k-devel] " Stephen Donecker
2012-06-16 21:03     ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-20  2:20       ` Stephen Donecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FC7F14F.3020608@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.