From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org
Subject: [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 08:37:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC0F8CE.1030303@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20416.19680.571601.549629@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On 05/25/2012 08:24 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>> We've been doing some tests using Atheros stations and various APs. The max throughput
>> we've seen so far is about 237Mbps (received UDP payload on the stations).
>> (Open-Air, AP about 5 feet away, 3x3 MIMO, HT40, 5Ghz, etc).
>>
>> We are still running lots of different permutations, but I am interested if
>> anyone else has any numbers to share (official or otherwise).
>
> Which card/chip ?
We're using WPEA-127N. We have a dual-core Atom for one system, and
a quad-core i7 CPU (and two wifi NICs) in another system.. So far, the Atom with
single NIC is benchmarking better in some tests. We were only using one of
the NICs in the i7 for testing, but maybe there is still some interference
or maybe we just had bad antenna placement or something.
We've used various Asus and Netgear APs...haven't done throughput tests with
home-grown APs running Atheros NICs recently, but will do so next week.
> With a XB112 card (3x3) in HT40 mode, 5Ghz, TX throughput (TCP) can reach 290 Mbps.
What chipset or brand/model is this? I see that XB112 mentioned in the WPEA-127N
description, but maybe that is just a form-factor description?
> Sample iperf run:
>
> [ 3] 28.0-29.0 sec 34.1 MBytes 286 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 29.0-30.0 sec 34.6 MBytes 290 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 30.0-31.0 sec 34.8 MBytes 292 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 31.0-32.0 sec 34.8 MBytes 292 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 32.0-33.0 sec 34.9 MBytes 293 Mbits/sec
Can you offer any additional details on how you tested this? You are using the same
NIC for both AP and station?
Open-air connection?
How far away is AP?
I would like to try to reproduce this result, as it is significantly better
than what I'm seeing.
Are you doing any special AP tuning, like using short-guard-intervals
or similar? Care to post the wpa_supplicant and hostapd config files?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net>
Subject: Re: Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests?
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 08:37:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC0F8CE.1030303@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20416.19680.571601.549629@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On 05/25/2012 08:24 PM, Sujith Manoharan wrote:
> Ben Greear wrote:
>> We've been doing some tests using Atheros stations and various APs. The max throughput
>> we've seen so far is about 237Mbps (received UDP payload on the stations).
>> (Open-Air, AP about 5 feet away, 3x3 MIMO, HT40, 5Ghz, etc).
>>
>> We are still running lots of different permutations, but I am interested if
>> anyone else has any numbers to share (official or otherwise).
>
> Which card/chip ?
We're using WPEA-127N. We have a dual-core Atom for one system, and
a quad-core i7 CPU (and two wifi NICs) in another system.. So far, the Atom with
single NIC is benchmarking better in some tests. We were only using one of
the NICs in the i7 for testing, but maybe there is still some interference
or maybe we just had bad antenna placement or something.
We've used various Asus and Netgear APs...haven't done throughput tests with
home-grown APs running Atheros NICs recently, but will do so next week.
> With a XB112 card (3x3) in HT40 mode, 5Ghz, TX throughput (TCP) can reach 290 Mbps.
What chipset or brand/model is this? I see that XB112 mentioned in the WPEA-127N
description, but maybe that is just a form-factor description?
> Sample iperf run:
>
> [ 3] 28.0-29.0 sec 34.1 MBytes 286 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 29.0-30.0 sec 34.6 MBytes 290 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 30.0-31.0 sec 34.8 MBytes 292 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 31.0-32.0 sec 34.8 MBytes 292 Mbits/sec
> [ 3] 32.0-33.0 sec 34.9 MBytes 293 Mbits/sec
Can you offer any additional details on how you tested this? You are using the same
NIC for both AP and station?
Open-air connection?
How far away is AP?
I would like to try to reproduce this result, as it is significantly better
than what I'm seeing.
Are you doing any special AP tuning, like using short-guard-intervals
or similar? Care to post the wpa_supplicant and hostapd config files?
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-26 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 3:17 [ath9k-devel] Anyone doing WiFi throughput tests? Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:17 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 3:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 3:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 5:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Joe Semler
2012-05-26 5:48 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 7:43 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 7:55 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 11:28 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 12:35 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:15 ` Joe Semler
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-26 17:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-29 10:24 ` Josef Semler
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-29 10:58 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 18:27 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2012-05-26 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-26 16:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:24 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 16:39 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 15:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-27 15:08 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 16:48 ` [ath9k-devel] " Peter Stuge
2012-05-27 17:38 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 17:40 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 18:14 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 18:14 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:15 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:15 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 23:29 ` [ath9k-devel] " Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 23:29 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-28 3:55 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-28 3:55 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-28 6:50 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 6:50 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 7:15 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 7:15 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-28 20:07 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-28 20:07 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` [ath9k-devel] " Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 19:24 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-31 22:31 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-31 22:31 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` [ath9k-devel] " Ben Greear
2012-05-29 18:23 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:07 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-29 19:19 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 0:06 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:22 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-30 3:47 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-31 2:29 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-26 17:58 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-05-29 8:14 ` [ath9k-devel] " Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 8:14 ` Zefir Kurtisi
2012-05-29 10:09 ` [ath9k-devel] " Peter Stuge
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-26 17:56 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 2:05 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:05 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` [ath9k-devel] " Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:09 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:16 ` Ben Greear
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 2:23 ` Sujith Manoharan
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 11:30 ` Felix Fietkau
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:32 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-05-27 12:31 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-15 21:08 ` [ath9k-devel] " Stephen Donecker
2012-06-16 21:03 ` Adrian Chadd
2012-06-20 2:20 ` Stephen Donecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC0F8CE.1030303@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.