From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3.9] Driver for 7-segment displays connected over GPIOs
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:23:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130107172340.GA32401@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107180708.2ffc1540@skate>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:07:08PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Greg Kroah-Hartman,
>
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:48:45 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > If you ever add/remove/modify sysfs files, you have to also do the same
> > for the Documentation/ABI/ files as well, please redo that in this patch
> > series.
>
> Sure.
>
> > But, the bigger question is, why is this a kernel driver at all? Can't
> > you do this from userspace today without any new kernel code?
>
> Indeed, it can be done from userspace since we're just controlling
> GPIOs. Having a kernel driver allows to describe this device in the
> Device Tree, like all other devices, and have it "magically" appear,
> with a convenient user-space interface.
Ok, that means you want to use the kernel-standard userspace interface
for displays, right? If so, why not use it? I thought we already
supported LCD displays already, isn't there an interface for it? Don't
create random magic sysfs files without really thinking about it.
> Not having a kernel driver means that gazillions of applications
> re-invent the same piece of code over and over again, have to hardcode
> the GPIO numbers for a given piece of hardware, while the kernel
> abstract all of this very nicely.
That sounds like a wonderful use of a userspace library to do this
properly. Much like libusb does, right?
I still think as this can be done in userspace, it probably should be.
thanks,
greg k-h
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
To: Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.9] Driver for 7-segment displays connected over GPIOs
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 09:23:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130107172340.GA32401@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130107180708.2ffc1540@skate>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 06:07:08PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Greg Kroah-Hartman,
>
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 08:48:45 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> > If you ever add/remove/modify sysfs files, you have to also do the same
> > for the Documentation/ABI/ files as well, please redo that in this patch
> > series.
>
> Sure.
>
> > But, the bigger question is, why is this a kernel driver at all? Can't
> > you do this from userspace today without any new kernel code?
>
> Indeed, it can be done from userspace since we're just controlling
> GPIOs. Having a kernel driver allows to describe this device in the
> Device Tree, like all other devices, and have it "magically" appear,
> with a convenient user-space interface.
Ok, that means you want to use the kernel-standard userspace interface
for displays, right? If so, why not use it? I thought we already
supported LCD displays already, isn't there an interface for it? Don't
create random magic sysfs files without really thinking about it.
> Not having a kernel driver means that gazillions of applications
> re-invent the same piece of code over and over again, have to hardcode
> the GPIO numbers for a given piece of hardware, while the kernel
> abstract all of this very nicely.
That sounds like a wonderful use of a userspace library to do this
properly. Much like libusb does, right?
I still think as this can be done in userspace, it probably should be.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-07 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 16:42 [PATCH 3.9] Driver for 7-segment displays connected over GPIOs Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 16:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 3.9 1/3] misc: new driver for GPIO-connected 7-segment displays Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 16:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 19:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-07 19:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-07 19:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 19:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 21:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-01-07 21:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-08 22:38 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-08 22:38 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-08 22:35 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-08 22:35 ` Grant Likely
2013-01-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 3.9 2/3] arm: mvebu: add the 7-segment display DT informations to Armada 370 DB Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 16:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 16:42 ` [PATCH 3.9 3/3] arm: mvebu: add the 7-segment display DT informations to Armada XP DB Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 16:42 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-02-08 22:39 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-08 22:39 ` Grant Likely
2013-01-07 16:48 ` [PATCH 3.9] Driver for 7-segment displays connected over GPIOs Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-07 16:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-07 17:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 17:07 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 17:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2013-01-07 17:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-07 17:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 17:40 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 17:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 17:43 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 17:56 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2013-01-07 17:56 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2013-01-07 18:02 ` Jason Cooper
2013-01-07 18:02 ` Jason Cooper
2013-01-07 18:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-07 18:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-01-07 17:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 17:53 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 18:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-07 18:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-01-07 18:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 18:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-07 23:05 ` Linus Walleij
2013-01-07 23:05 ` Linus Walleij
2013-02-09 16:28 ` Pavel Machek
2013-02-09 16:28 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130107172340.GA32401@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.