From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:39:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130618203937.GA2516@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130618201021.GA11688@obsidianresearch.com>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:10:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:02:42PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > Having the kernel enforce that the DT node is present and at the right
> > > location, I think, is helpful for the bootloader folks to ensure they
> > > write correct DTs.
>
> > Granted. But then I wonder... why do we bother to put the BootROM in the
> > DT window if we're going to check for a fixed address it in any case?
>
> Code re-use in the mbus driver?
>
> Maybe future SOCs in this family will have programmable SMP startup
> addresses?
>
> Non-SMP systems don't need to map the boot rom at all?
>
Three great answers :)
--
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Maen Suleiman <maen-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Sebastian Hesselbarth
<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:39:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130618203937.GA2516@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130618201021.GA11688-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 02:10:21PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:02:42PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> > > Having the kernel enforce that the DT node is present and at the right
> > > location, I think, is helpful for the bootloader folks to ensure they
> > > write correct DTs.
>
> > Granted. But then I wonder... why do we bother to put the BootROM in the
> > DT window if we're going to check for a fixed address it in any case?
>
> Code re-use in the mbus driver?
>
> Maybe future SOCs in this family will have programmable SMP startup
> addresses?
>
> Non-SMP systems don't need to map the boot rom at all?
>
Three great answers :)
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 11:25 [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 18:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 19:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 19:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:37 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-19 19:37 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:24 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:24 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:59 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:59 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 19:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:27 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 19:27 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 20:49 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:49 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 21:10 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:10 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 17:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 17:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 19:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-06-18 20:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 10:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 10:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 16:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 16:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 17:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 17:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:39 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 11:39 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 12:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 12:33 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:33 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:48 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 12:48 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ARM: mvebu: Use the preprocessor on Armada 370/XP device tree files Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 22:09 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:09 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:14 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:14 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370 PCIe " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 18:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 19:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:40 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:40 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 11:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 11:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 18:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada XP " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 11:33 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 13:07 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 13:07 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130618203937.GA2516@localhost \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.