From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:49:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130618204911.GB2516@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C0B4A0.90204@gmail.com>
Hi Sebastian,
You loose +1 internet points for dropping me from Cc ;-)
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:27:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 09:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > The forms could be:
> >
> > 0IAA0000
> > FK000000
> > - K=0 -> internal regs
> > - K=1 -> PCI-E thingy
> > etc
> > 1IIAA000 (future expansion example)
>
> Ok, got it. Any encoding is fine that allows to distinguish real
> remap windows and fake ones. I assumed that maybe someday there
> will be more than 4b target id so 0x80 as special case indicator
> leaves 7b of normal target id in the _current_ mapping.
>
I'm also wondering about why we not care about target IDs being more
than 4 bits.
Jason: (I'm checking now but perhaps you know better than me):
Is there any MBus-architectural reason for you assuring the
target ID will always be within 4-bits?
Thanks,
--
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth
<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>,
Maen Suleiman <maen-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:49:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130618204911.GB2516@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C0B4A0.90204-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Hi Sebastian,
You loose +1 internet points for dropping me from Cc ;-)
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:27:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 09:10 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >
> > The forms could be:
> >
> > 0IAA0000
> > FK000000
> > - K=0 -> internal regs
> > - K=1 -> PCI-E thingy
> > etc
> > 1IIAA000 (future expansion example)
>
> Ok, got it. Any encoding is fine that allows to distinguish real
> remap windows and fake ones. I assumed that maybe someday there
> will be more than 4b target id so 0x80 as special case indicator
> leaves 7b of normal target id in the _current_ mapping.
>
I'm also wondering about why we not care about target IDs being more
than 4 bits.
Jason: (I'm checking now but perhaps you know better than me):
Is there any MBus-architectural reason for you assuring the
target ID will always be within 4-bits?
Thanks,
--
Ezequiel García, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 11:25 [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:34 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 18:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:52 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 19:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 19:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:29 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:37 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-19 19:37 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:24 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:24 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:44 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:59 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:59 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 19:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:27 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 19:27 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 20:49 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-06-18 20:49 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 21:10 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:10 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 17:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 17:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 19:43 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:39 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 10:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 10:02 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 16:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 16:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 17:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 17:58 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:39 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 11:39 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 12:17 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 12:33 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:33 ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:48 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 12:48 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ARM: mvebu: Use the preprocessor on Armada 370/XP device tree files Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 22:09 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:09 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:14 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:14 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370 PCIe " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 16:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 18:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 19:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:40 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:40 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 11:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 11:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 12:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 16:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 18:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada XP " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 11:33 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 13:07 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 13:07 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130618204911.GB2516@localhost \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.