All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:16:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202131659.GA5621@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202123654.GC4523@arm.com>

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:36:54PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:50:09PM +0800, Li Bin wrote:
> > On arm64, kstop_machine which is hugely disruptive to a running
> > system is not needed to convert nops to ftrace calls or back,
> > because that modifed code is a single 32bit instructions which
> > is impossible to cross cache (or page) boundaries, and the used str
> > instruction is single-copy atomic.
> 
> This commit message is misleading, since the single-copy atomicity
> guarantees don't apply to the instruction-side. Instead, the architecture
> calls out a handful of safe instructions in "Concurrent modification and
> execution of instructions".
> 
> Now, those safe instructions *do* include NOP, B and BL, so that should
> be sufficient for ftrace provided that we don't patch condition codes
> (and I don't think we do).

Thinking about this some more, you also need to fix the validate=1 case
in ftrace_modify_code so that it can run outside of stop_machine. We
currently rely on that to deal with concurrent modifications (e.g.
module unloading).

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, mingo@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	dingtianhong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:16:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151202131659.GA5621@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202123654.GC4523@arm.com>

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:36:54PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 03:50:09PM +0800, Li Bin wrote:
> > On arm64, kstop_machine which is hugely disruptive to a running
> > system is not needed to convert nops to ftrace calls or back,
> > because that modifed code is a single 32bit instructions which
> > is impossible to cross cache (or page) boundaries, and the used str
> > instruction is single-copy atomic.
> 
> This commit message is misleading, since the single-copy atomicity
> guarantees don't apply to the instruction-side. Instead, the architecture
> calls out a handful of safe instructions in "Concurrent modification and
> execution of instructions".
> 
> Now, those safe instructions *do* include NOP, B and BL, so that should
> be sufficient for ftrace provided that we don't patch condition codes
> (and I don't think we do).

Thinking about this some more, you also need to fix the validate=1 case
in ftrace_modify_code so that it can run outside of stop_machine. We
currently rely on that to deal with concurrent modifications (e.g.
module unloading).

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-02 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-28  7:50 [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing Li Bin
2015-11-28  7:50 ` Li Bin
2015-11-28 15:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-28 15:58   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-30  2:03   ` libin
2015-11-30  2:03     ` libin
2015-12-02 12:36 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-02 12:36   ` Will Deacon
2015-12-02 13:16   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-12-02 13:16     ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03  9:39     ` libin
2015-12-03  9:39       ` libin
2015-12-03 11:48       ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 11:48         ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:07         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:07           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-02 14:02   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-02 14:02     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03  9:21   ` libin
2015-12-03  9:21     ` libin
2015-12-03  9:38     ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03  9:38       ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:05       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:05         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:09         ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:09           ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:31           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:31             ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-04  1:00             ` libin
2015-12-04  1:00               ` libin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151202131659.GA5621@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.