All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:09:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203150926.GG11337@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203100525.70cc40de@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:05:25AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:38:21 +0000
> Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > I think you're missing the case where the instruction changes under our
> > feet after we've read it but before we've replaced it (e.g. due to module
> > unloading). I think that's why ftrace_modify_code has the comment about
> > lack of locking thanks to stop_machine.
> 
> Note, ftrace has a module notifier that is called when a module is
> being unloaded and before the text goes away. This code grabs the
> ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions from the ftrace
> list, such that it will no longer do any modifications to that module's
> text.
> 
> The update to make functions be traced is done under the ftrace_lock
> mutex as well.
> 
> You do not need to worry about module text disappearing from
> underneath you while you do your modifications.

Good.

> Now, if there's comments that suggest otherwise, they need to be
> updated.

Yeah, I think the comments on x86 and arm64 are out of date. They also
mention the freeing of __init sections -- is that still a concern?

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: libin <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,
	mingo@redhat.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
	dingtianhong@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:09:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203150926.GG11337@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203100525.70cc40de@gandalf.local.home>

On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:05:25AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:38:21 +0000
> Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
> > I think you're missing the case where the instruction changes under our
> > feet after we've read it but before we've replaced it (e.g. due to module
> > unloading). I think that's why ftrace_modify_code has the comment about
> > lack of locking thanks to stop_machine.
> 
> Note, ftrace has a module notifier that is called when a module is
> being unloaded and before the text goes away. This code grabs the
> ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions from the ftrace
> list, such that it will no longer do any modifications to that module's
> text.
> 
> The update to make functions be traced is done under the ftrace_lock
> mutex as well.
> 
> You do not need to worry about module text disappearing from
> underneath you while you do your modifications.

Good.

> Now, if there's comments that suggest otherwise, they need to be
> updated.

Yeah, I think the comments on x86 and arm64 are out of date. They also
mention the freeing of __init sections -- is that still a concern?

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-03 15:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-28  7:50 [PATCH] arm64: ftrace: stop using kstop_machine to enable/disable tracing Li Bin
2015-11-28  7:50 ` Li Bin
2015-11-28 15:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-28 15:58   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-11-30  2:03   ` libin
2015-11-30  2:03     ` libin
2015-12-02 12:36 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-02 12:36   ` Will Deacon
2015-12-02 13:16   ` Will Deacon
2015-12-02 13:16     ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03  9:39     ` libin
2015-12-03  9:39       ` libin
2015-12-03 11:48       ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 11:48         ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:07         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:07           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-02 14:02   ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-02 14:02     ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03  9:21   ` libin
2015-12-03  9:21     ` libin
2015-12-03  9:38     ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03  9:38       ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:05       ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:05         ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:09         ` Will Deacon [this message]
2015-12-03 15:09           ` Will Deacon
2015-12-03 15:31           ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-03 15:31             ` Steven Rostedt
2015-12-04  1:00             ` libin
2015-12-04  1:00               ` libin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151203150926.GG11337@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.