All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/15] drm/i915/selftests: mock test io_size
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:13:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220210121313.701004-8-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210121313.701004-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>

Check that mappable vs non-mappable matches our expectations.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c  | 143 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 143 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
index 247f65f02bbf..56dec9723601 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
 #include "gem/i915_gem_lmem.h"
 #include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
+#include "gem/i915_gem_ttm.h"
 #include "gem/selftests/igt_gem_utils.h"
 #include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h"
 #include "gt/intel_engine_pm.h"
@@ -512,6 +513,147 @@ static int igt_mock_max_segment(void *arg)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static u64 igt_object_mappable_total(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+	struct intel_memory_region *mr = obj->mm.region;
+	struct i915_ttm_buddy_resource *bman_res =
+		to_ttm_buddy_resource(obj->mm.res);
+	struct drm_buddy *mm = bman_res->mm;
+	struct drm_buddy_block *block;
+	u64 total;
+
+	total = 0;
+	list_for_each_entry(block, &bman_res->blocks, link) {
+		u64 start = drm_buddy_block_offset(block);
+		u64 end = start + drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
+
+		if (start < mr->io_size)
+			total += min_t(u64, end, mr->io_size) - start;
+	}
+
+	return total;
+}
+
+static int igt_mock_io_size(void *arg)
+{
+	struct intel_memory_region *mr = arg;
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = mr->i915;
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	u64 mappable_theft_total;
+	u64 io_size;
+	u64 total;
+	u64 ps;
+	u64 rem;
+	u64 size;
+	I915_RND_STATE(prng);
+	LIST_HEAD(objects);
+	int err = 0;
+
+	ps = SZ_4K;
+	if (i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng) & 1)
+		ps = SZ_64K; /* For something like DG2 */
+
+	div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng), SZ_8G, &total);
+	total = round_down(total, ps);
+	total = max_t(u64, total, SZ_1G);
+
+	div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng), total - ps, &io_size);
+	io_size = round_down(io_size, ps);
+	io_size = max_t(u64, io_size, SZ_256M); /* 256M seems to be the common lower limit */
+
+	pr_info("%s with ps=%llx, io_size=%llx, total=%llx\n",
+		__func__, ps, io_size, total);
+
+	mr = mock_region_create(i915, 0, total, ps, 0, io_size);
+	if (IS_ERR(mr)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(mr);
+		goto out_err;
+	}
+
+	mappable_theft_total = 0;
+	rem = total - io_size;
+	do {
+		div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng), rem, &size);
+		size = round_down(size, ps);
+		size = max(size, ps);
+
+		obj = igt_object_create(mr, &objects, size,
+					I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY);
+		if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+			pr_err("%s TOPDOWN failed with rem=%llx, size=%llx\n",
+			       __func__, rem, size);
+			err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+			goto out_close;
+		}
+
+		mappable_theft_total += igt_object_mappable_total(obj);
+		rem -= size;
+	} while (rem);
+
+	pr_info("%s mappable theft=(%lluMiB/%lluMiB), total=%lluMiB\n",
+		__func__,
+		(u64)mappable_theft_total >> 20,
+		(u64)io_size >> 20,
+		(u64)total >> 20);
+
+	/*
+	 * Even if we allocate all of the non-mappable portion, we should still
+	 * be able to dip into the mappable portion.
+	 */
+	obj = igt_object_create(mr, &objects, io_size,
+				I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY);
+	if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		pr_err("%s allocation unexpectedly failed\n", __func__);
+		err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+		goto out_close;
+	}
+
+	close_objects(mr, &objects);
+
+	rem = io_size;
+	do {
+		div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng), rem, &size);
+		size = round_down(size, ps);
+		size = max(size, ps);
+
+		obj = igt_object_create(mr, &objects, size, 0);
+		if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+			pr_err("%s MAPPABLE failed with rem=%llx, size=%llx\n",
+			       __func__, rem, size);
+			err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+			goto out_close;
+		}
+
+		if (igt_object_mappable_total(obj) != size) {
+			pr_err("%s allocation is not mappable(size=%llx)\n",
+			       __func__, size);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_close;
+		}
+		rem -= size;
+	} while (rem);
+
+	/*
+	 * We assume CPU access is required by default, which should result in a
+	 * failure here, even though the non-mappable portion is free.
+	 */
+	obj = igt_object_create(mr, &objects, ps, 0);
+	if (!IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		pr_err("%s allocation unexpectedly succeeded\n", __func__);
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_close;
+	}
+
+out_close:
+	close_objects(mr, &objects);
+	intel_memory_region_destroy(mr);
+out_err:
+	if (err == -ENOMEM)
+		err = 0;
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int igt_gpu_write_dw(struct intel_context *ce,
 			    struct i915_vma *vma,
 			    u32 dword,
@@ -1179,6 +1321,7 @@ int intel_memory_region_mock_selftests(void)
 		SUBTEST(igt_mock_contiguous),
 		SUBTEST(igt_mock_splintered_region),
 		SUBTEST(igt_mock_max_segment),
+		SUBTEST(igt_mock_io_size),
 	};
 	struct intel_memory_region *mem;
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915;
-- 
2.34.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/15] drm/i915/selftests: mock test io_size
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:13:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220210121313.701004-8-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210121313.701004-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>

Check that mappable vs non-mappable matches our expectations.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
 .../drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c  | 143 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 143 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
index 247f65f02bbf..56dec9723601 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_memory_region.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 #include "gem/i915_gem_context.h"
 #include "gem/i915_gem_lmem.h"
 #include "gem/i915_gem_region.h"
+#include "gem/i915_gem_ttm.h"
 #include "gem/selftests/igt_gem_utils.h"
 #include "gem/selftests/mock_context.h"
 #include "gt/intel_engine_pm.h"
@@ -512,6 +513,147 @@ static int igt_mock_max_segment(void *arg)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static u64 igt_object_mappable_total(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
+{
+	struct intel_memory_region *mr = obj->mm.region;
+	struct i915_ttm_buddy_resource *bman_res =
+		to_ttm_buddy_resource(obj->mm.res);
+	struct drm_buddy *mm = bman_res->mm;
+	struct drm_buddy_block *block;
+	u64 total;
+
+	total = 0;
+	list_for_each_entry(block, &bman_res->blocks, link) {
+		u64 start = drm_buddy_block_offset(block);
+		u64 end = start + drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
+
+		if (start < mr->io_size)
+			total += min_t(u64, end, mr->io_size) - start;
+	}
+
+	return total;
+}
+
+static int igt_mock_io_size(void *arg)
+{
+	struct intel_memory_region *mr = arg;
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = mr->i915;
+	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
+	u64 mappable_theft_total;
+	u64 io_size;
+	u64 total;
+	u64 ps;
+	u64 rem;
+	u64 size;
+	I915_RND_STATE(prng);
+	LIST_HEAD(objects);
+	int err = 0;
+
+	ps = SZ_4K;
+	if (i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng) & 1)
+		ps = SZ_64K; /* For something like DG2 */
+
+	div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng), SZ_8G, &total);
+	total = round_down(total, ps);
+	total = max_t(u64, total, SZ_1G);
+
+	div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng), total - ps, &io_size);
+	io_size = round_down(io_size, ps);
+	io_size = max_t(u64, io_size, SZ_256M); /* 256M seems to be the common lower limit */
+
+	pr_info("%s with ps=%llx, io_size=%llx, total=%llx\n",
+		__func__, ps, io_size, total);
+
+	mr = mock_region_create(i915, 0, total, ps, 0, io_size);
+	if (IS_ERR(mr)) {
+		err = PTR_ERR(mr);
+		goto out_err;
+	}
+
+	mappable_theft_total = 0;
+	rem = total - io_size;
+	do {
+		div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng), rem, &size);
+		size = round_down(size, ps);
+		size = max(size, ps);
+
+		obj = igt_object_create(mr, &objects, size,
+					I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY);
+		if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+			pr_err("%s TOPDOWN failed with rem=%llx, size=%llx\n",
+			       __func__, rem, size);
+			err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+			goto out_close;
+		}
+
+		mappable_theft_total += igt_object_mappable_total(obj);
+		rem -= size;
+	} while (rem);
+
+	pr_info("%s mappable theft=(%lluMiB/%lluMiB), total=%lluMiB\n",
+		__func__,
+		(u64)mappable_theft_total >> 20,
+		(u64)io_size >> 20,
+		(u64)total >> 20);
+
+	/*
+	 * Even if we allocate all of the non-mappable portion, we should still
+	 * be able to dip into the mappable portion.
+	 */
+	obj = igt_object_create(mr, &objects, io_size,
+				I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY);
+	if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		pr_err("%s allocation unexpectedly failed\n", __func__);
+		err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+		goto out_close;
+	}
+
+	close_objects(mr, &objects);
+
+	rem = io_size;
+	do {
+		div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(&prng), rem, &size);
+		size = round_down(size, ps);
+		size = max(size, ps);
+
+		obj = igt_object_create(mr, &objects, size, 0);
+		if (IS_ERR(obj)) {
+			pr_err("%s MAPPABLE failed with rem=%llx, size=%llx\n",
+			       __func__, rem, size);
+			err = PTR_ERR(obj);
+			goto out_close;
+		}
+
+		if (igt_object_mappable_total(obj) != size) {
+			pr_err("%s allocation is not mappable(size=%llx)\n",
+			       __func__, size);
+			err = -EINVAL;
+			goto out_close;
+		}
+		rem -= size;
+	} while (rem);
+
+	/*
+	 * We assume CPU access is required by default, which should result in a
+	 * failure here, even though the non-mappable portion is free.
+	 */
+	obj = igt_object_create(mr, &objects, ps, 0);
+	if (!IS_ERR(obj)) {
+		pr_err("%s allocation unexpectedly succeeded\n", __func__);
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto out_close;
+	}
+
+out_close:
+	close_objects(mr, &objects);
+	intel_memory_region_destroy(mr);
+out_err:
+	if (err == -ENOMEM)
+		err = 0;
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int igt_gpu_write_dw(struct intel_context *ce,
 			    struct i915_vma *vma,
 			    u32 dword,
@@ -1179,6 +1321,7 @@ int intel_memory_region_mock_selftests(void)
 		SUBTEST(igt_mock_contiguous),
 		SUBTEST(igt_mock_splintered_region),
 		SUBTEST(igt_mock_max_segment),
+		SUBTEST(igt_mock_io_size),
 	};
 	struct intel_memory_region *mem;
 	struct drm_i915_private *i915;
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-10 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-10 12:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/15] Initial support for small BAR recovery Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/15] drm/i915: add io_size plumbing Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/15] drm/i915/ttm: require mappable by default Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:20     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/15] drm/i915: add I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:23   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:23     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/15] drm/i915/buddy: track available visible size Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:25   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:25     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/15] drm/i915/buddy: adjust res->start Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/15] drm/i915/buddy: tweak 2big check Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2022-02-10 12:13   ` [PATCH v2 07/15] drm/i915/selftests: mock test io_size Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/i915/ttm: make eviction mappable aware Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/15] drm/i915/ttm: mappable migration on fault Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/15] drm/i915/selftests: exercise mmap migration Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:36     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/15] drm/i915/selftests: handle allocation failures Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:37     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/i915/create: apply ALLOC_GPU_ONLY by default Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:49   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:49     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:55       ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:00         ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:14           ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/15] drm/i915/uapi: add NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS hint Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:59     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/15] drm/i915/uapi: forbid ALLOC_GPU_ONLY for error capture Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:06   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:06     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/15] drm/i915/lmem: don't treat small BAR as an error Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:08     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 14:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/15] Initial support for small BAR recovery Das, Nirmoy
2022-02-10 15:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Initial support for small BAR recovery (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220210121313.701004-8-matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.