From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/i915/ttm: make eviction mappable aware
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:13:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220210121313.701004-9-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210121313.701004-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
If we need to make room for some mappable object, then we should
only victimize objects that have one or pages that occupy the visible
portion of LMEM. Let's also create a new priority hint for objects that
are placed in mappable memory, where we know that CPU access was
requested, that way we hopefully victimize these last.
v2(Thomas): s/TTM_PL_PRIV/I915_PL_LMEM0/
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
index 36e77fcf2ef9..3790e569d6a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@
#include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
#include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
+#include <drm/drm_buddy.h>
#include "i915_drv.h"
+#include "i915_ttm_buddy_manager.h"
#include "intel_memory_region.h"
#include "intel_region_ttm.h"
@@ -20,6 +22,7 @@
#define I915_TTM_PRIO_PURGE 0
#define I915_TTM_PRIO_NO_PAGES 1
#define I915_TTM_PRIO_HAS_PAGES 2
+#define I915_TTM_PRIO_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS 3
/*
* Size of struct ttm_place vector in on-stack struct ttm_placement allocs
@@ -337,6 +340,7 @@ static bool i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
const struct ttm_place *place)
{
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
+ struct ttm_resource *res = bo->resource;
if (!obj)
return false;
@@ -350,7 +354,48 @@ static bool i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
return false;
/* Will do for now. Our pinned objects are still on TTM's LRU lists */
- return i915_gem_object_evictable(obj);
+ if (!i915_gem_object_evictable(obj))
+ return false;
+
+ switch (res->mem_type) {
+ case I915_PL_LMEM0: {
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
+ ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, res->mem_type);
+ struct i915_ttm_buddy_resource *bman_res =
+ to_ttm_buddy_resource(res);
+ struct drm_buddy *mm = bman_res->mm;
+ struct drm_buddy_block *block;
+
+ if (!place->fpfn && !place->lpfn)
+ return true;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!place->lpfn);
+
+ /*
+ * If we just want something mappable then we can quickly check
+ * if the current victim resource is using any of the CPU
+ * visible portion.
+ */
+ if (!place->fpfn &&
+ place->lpfn == i915_ttm_buddy_man_visible_size(man))
+ return bman_res->used_visible_size > 0;
+
+ /* Real range allocation */
+ list_for_each_entry(block, &bman_res->blocks, link) {
+ unsigned long fpfn =
+ drm_buddy_block_offset(block) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ unsigned long lpfn = fpfn +
+ (drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+ if (place->fpfn < lpfn && place->lpfn > fpfn)
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+ } default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return true;
}
static void i915_ttm_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
@@ -850,7 +895,23 @@ void i915_ttm_adjust_lru(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
} else if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_NO_PAGES;
} else {
- bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_HAS_PAGES;
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
+ ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, bo->resource->mem_type);
+
+ /*
+ * If we need to place an LMEM resource which doesn't need CPU
+ * access then we should try not to victimize mappable objects
+ * first, since we likely end up stealing more of the mappable
+ * portion. And likewise when we try to find space for a mappble
+ * object, we know not to ever victimize objects that don't
+ * occupy any mappable pages.
+ */
+ if (i915_ttm_cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) &&
+ i915_ttm_buddy_man_visible_size(man) < man->size &&
+ !(obj->flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY))
+ bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS;
+ else
+ bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_HAS_PAGES;
}
ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(bo, bo->resource, NULL);
--
2.34.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/i915/ttm: make eviction mappable aware
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:13:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220210121313.701004-9-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210121313.701004-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>
If we need to make room for some mappable object, then we should
only victimize objects that have one or pages that occupy the visible
portion of LMEM. Let's also create a new priority hint for objects that
are placed in mappable memory, where we know that CPU access was
requested, that way we hopefully victimize these last.
v2(Thomas): s/TTM_PL_PRIV/I915_PL_LMEM0/
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
index 36e77fcf2ef9..3790e569d6a9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
@@ -5,8 +5,10 @@
#include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
#include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
+#include <drm/drm_buddy.h>
#include "i915_drv.h"
+#include "i915_ttm_buddy_manager.h"
#include "intel_memory_region.h"
#include "intel_region_ttm.h"
@@ -20,6 +22,7 @@
#define I915_TTM_PRIO_PURGE 0
#define I915_TTM_PRIO_NO_PAGES 1
#define I915_TTM_PRIO_HAS_PAGES 2
+#define I915_TTM_PRIO_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS 3
/*
* Size of struct ttm_place vector in on-stack struct ttm_placement allocs
@@ -337,6 +340,7 @@ static bool i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
const struct ttm_place *place)
{
struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = i915_ttm_to_gem(bo);
+ struct ttm_resource *res = bo->resource;
if (!obj)
return false;
@@ -350,7 +354,48 @@ static bool i915_ttm_eviction_valuable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
return false;
/* Will do for now. Our pinned objects are still on TTM's LRU lists */
- return i915_gem_object_evictable(obj);
+ if (!i915_gem_object_evictable(obj))
+ return false;
+
+ switch (res->mem_type) {
+ case I915_PL_LMEM0: {
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
+ ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, res->mem_type);
+ struct i915_ttm_buddy_resource *bman_res =
+ to_ttm_buddy_resource(res);
+ struct drm_buddy *mm = bman_res->mm;
+ struct drm_buddy_block *block;
+
+ if (!place->fpfn && !place->lpfn)
+ return true;
+
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!place->lpfn);
+
+ /*
+ * If we just want something mappable then we can quickly check
+ * if the current victim resource is using any of the CPU
+ * visible portion.
+ */
+ if (!place->fpfn &&
+ place->lpfn == i915_ttm_buddy_man_visible_size(man))
+ return bman_res->used_visible_size > 0;
+
+ /* Real range allocation */
+ list_for_each_entry(block, &bman_res->blocks, link) {
+ unsigned long fpfn =
+ drm_buddy_block_offset(block) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ unsigned long lpfn = fpfn +
+ (drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
+
+ if (place->fpfn < lpfn && place->lpfn > fpfn)
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+ } default:
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return true;
}
static void i915_ttm_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
@@ -850,7 +895,23 @@ void i915_ttm_adjust_lru(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
} else if (!i915_gem_object_has_pages(obj)) {
bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_NO_PAGES;
} else {
- bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_HAS_PAGES;
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man =
+ ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, bo->resource->mem_type);
+
+ /*
+ * If we need to place an LMEM resource which doesn't need CPU
+ * access then we should try not to victimize mappable objects
+ * first, since we likely end up stealing more of the mappable
+ * portion. And likewise when we try to find space for a mappble
+ * object, we know not to ever victimize objects that don't
+ * occupy any mappable pages.
+ */
+ if (i915_ttm_cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) &&
+ i915_ttm_buddy_man_visible_size(man) < man->size &&
+ !(obj->flags & I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY))
+ bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS;
+ else
+ bo->priority = I915_TTM_PRIO_HAS_PAGES;
}
ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(bo, bo->resource, NULL);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-10 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-10 12:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/15] Initial support for small BAR recovery Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/15] drm/i915: add io_size plumbing Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/15] drm/i915/ttm: require mappable by default Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 9:20 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 9:20 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/15] drm/i915: add I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 9:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 9:23 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/15] drm/i915/buddy: track available visible size Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 9:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 9:25 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/15] drm/i915/buddy: adjust res->start Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/15] drm/i915/buddy: tweak 2big check Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/15] drm/i915/selftests: mock test io_size Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/i915/ttm: make eviction mappable aware Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/15] drm/i915/ttm: mappable migration on fault Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/15] drm/i915/selftests: exercise mmap migration Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 9:36 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 9:36 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/15] drm/i915/selftests: handle allocation failures Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 9:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 9:37 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/i915/create: apply ALLOC_GPU_ONLY by default Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 9:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 9:49 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 9:52 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 9:55 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:00 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:14 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/15] drm/i915/uapi: add NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS hint Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 9:59 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/15] drm/i915/uapi: forbid ALLOC_GPU_ONLY for error capture Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:06 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/15] drm/i915/lmem: don't treat small BAR as an error Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:08 ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 14:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/15] Initial support for small BAR recovery Das, Nirmoy
2022-02-10 15:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Initial support for small BAR recovery (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220210121313.701004-9-matthew.auld@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.