All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/i915/create: apply ALLOC_GPU_ONLY by default
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:49:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4f128ad-1738-cee7-6790-fbdbb6d5698d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210121313.701004-13-matthew.auld@intel.com>


On 2/10/22 13:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Starting from DG2+, when dealing with LMEM, we assume that by default
> all userspace allocations should be placed in the non-mappable portion
> of LMEM.  Note that dumb buffers are not included here, since these are
> not "GPU accelerated" and likely need CPU access.
>
> In a later patch userspace will be able to provide a hint if CPU access
> to the buffer is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c
> index 9402d4bf4ffc..cc9ddb943f96 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c
> @@ -424,6 +424,15 @@ i915_gem_create_ext_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   		ext_data.n_placements = 1;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * TODO: add a userspace hint to force CPU_ACCESS for the object, which
> +	 * can override this.
> +	 */
> +	if (!IS_DG1(i915) && (ext_data.n_placements > 1 ||
> +			      ext_data.placements[0]->type !=
> +			      INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM))
> +		ext_data.flags |= I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY;
> +

WRT previous review comment here, it would be easier to follow if the bo 
was marked as a GPU only buffer regardless. Then for example capture and 
other functions where it actually matters can choose to take action 
based on, for example, whether the BAR is restricted or not?

/Thomas



>   	obj = __i915_gem_object_create_user_ext(i915, args->size,
>   						ext_data.placements,
>   						ext_data.n_placements,

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/i915/create: apply ALLOC_GPU_ONLY by default
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:49:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4f128ad-1738-cee7-6790-fbdbb6d5698d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220210121313.701004-13-matthew.auld@intel.com>


On 2/10/22 13:13, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Starting from DG2+, when dealing with LMEM, we assume that by default
> all userspace allocations should be placed in the non-mappable portion
> of LMEM.  Note that dumb buffers are not included here, since these are
> not "GPU accelerated" and likely need CPU access.
>
> In a later patch userspace will be able to provide a hint if CPU access
> to the buffer is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c | 9 +++++++++
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c
> index 9402d4bf4ffc..cc9ddb943f96 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_create.c
> @@ -424,6 +424,15 @@ i915_gem_create_ext_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   		ext_data.n_placements = 1;
>   	}
>   
> +	/*
> +	 * TODO: add a userspace hint to force CPU_ACCESS for the object, which
> +	 * can override this.
> +	 */
> +	if (!IS_DG1(i915) && (ext_data.n_placements > 1 ||
> +			      ext_data.placements[0]->type !=
> +			      INTEL_MEMORY_SYSTEM))
> +		ext_data.flags |= I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY;
> +

WRT previous review comment here, it would be easier to follow if the bo 
was marked as a GPU only buffer regardless. Then for example capture and 
other functions where it actually matters can choose to take action 
based on, for example, whether the BAR is restricted or not?

/Thomas



>   	obj = __i915_gem_object_create_user_ext(i915, args->size,
>   						ext_data.placements,
>   						ext_data.n_placements,

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-11  9:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-10 12:12 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/15] Initial support for small BAR recovery Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12 ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 01/15] drm/i915: add io_size plumbing Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:12   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/15] drm/i915/ttm: require mappable by default Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:20   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:20     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 03/15] drm/i915: add I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:23   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:23     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 04/15] drm/i915/buddy: track available visible size Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:25   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:25     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 05/15] drm/i915/buddy: adjust res->start Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/15] drm/i915/buddy: tweak 2big check Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/15] drm/i915/selftests: mock test io_size Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/15] drm/i915/ttm: make eviction mappable aware Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 09/15] drm/i915/ttm: mappable migration on fault Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/15] drm/i915/selftests: exercise mmap migration Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:36   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:36     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 11/15] drm/i915/selftests: handle allocation failures Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:37   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:37     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 12/15] drm/i915/create: apply ALLOC_GPU_ONLY by default Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:49   ` Thomas Hellström [this message]
2022-02-11  9:49     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:52     ` [Intel-gfx] " Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:55       ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:00         ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:14           ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 13/15] drm/i915/uapi: add NEEDS_CPU_ACCESS hint Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11  9:59   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11  9:59     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 14/15] drm/i915/uapi: forbid ALLOC_GPU_ONLY for error capture Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:06   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:06     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 12:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 15/15] drm/i915/lmem: don't treat small BAR as an error Matthew Auld
2022-02-10 12:13   ` Matthew Auld
2022-02-11 10:08   ` [Intel-gfx] " Thomas Hellström
2022-02-11 10:08     ` Thomas Hellström
2022-02-10 14:40 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/15] Initial support for small BAR recovery Das, Nirmoy
2022-02-10 15:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for Initial support for small BAR recovery (rev3) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4f128ad-1738-cee7-6790-fbdbb6d5698d@linux.intel.com \
    --to=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.