All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org,
	bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
	green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
	deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
	x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-pa
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok()
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:34:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214163452.1568807-2-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Three architectures check the end of a user access against the
address limit without taking a possible overflow into account.
Passing a negative length or another overflow in here returns
success when it should not.

Use the most common correct implementation here, which optimizes
for a constant 'size' argument, and turns the common case into a
single comparison.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da551281947c ("csky: User access")
Fixes: f663b60f5215 ("microblaze: Fix uaccess_ok macro")
Fixes: 7567746e1c0d ("Hexagon: Add user access functions")
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  7 +++----
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 18 +++++++++---------
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 19 ++++---------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c40f06ee8d3e..ac5a54f57d40 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 #define __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? KERNEL_DS.seg : get_fs().seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
 static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	return ((addr < limit) && ((addr + size) < limit));
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
 #define __access_ok __access_ok
 
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ef5bfef8d490..719ba3f3c45c 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@
  * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block *may* be valid, false (zero)
  * if it is definitely invalid.
  *
- * User address space in Hexagon, like x86, goes to 0xbfffffff, so the
- * simple MSB-based tests used by MIPS won't work.  Some further
- * optimization is probably possible here, but for now, keep it
- * reasonably simple and not *too* slow.  After all, we've got the
- * MMU for backup.
  */
+#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
 
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) \
-	((get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg) || \
-	(((unsigned long)addr < get_fs().seg) && \
-	  (unsigned long)size < (get_fs().seg - (unsigned long)addr)))
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
+
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
+}
+#define __access_ok __access_ok
 
 /*
  * When a kernel-mode page fault is taken, the faulting instruction
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d2a8ef9f8978..5b6e0e7788f4 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -39,24 +39,13 @@
 
 # define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
 
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (!size)
-		goto ok;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	if ((get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr)) ||
-			(get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr + size - 1))) {
-		pr_devel("ACCESS fail at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-		return 0;
-	}
-ok:
-	pr_devel("ACCESS OK at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-	return 1;
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
+#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)addr, size)
 
 # define __FIXUP_SECTION	".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-- 
2.29.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org,
	bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
	green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
	deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
	x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok()
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:34:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214163452.1568807-2-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Three architectures check the end of a user access against the
address limit without taking a possible overflow into account.
Passing a negative length or another overflow in here returns
success when it should not.

Use the most common correct implementation here, which optimizes
for a constant 'size' argument, and turns the common case into a
single comparison.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da551281947c ("csky: User access")
Fixes: f663b60f5215 ("microblaze: Fix uaccess_ok macro")
Fixes: 7567746e1c0d ("Hexagon: Add user access functions")
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  7 +++----
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 18 +++++++++---------
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 19 ++++---------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c40f06ee8d3e..ac5a54f57d40 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 #define __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? KERNEL_DS.seg : get_fs().seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
 static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	return ((addr < limit) && ((addr + size) < limit));
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
 #define __access_ok __access_ok
 
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ef5bfef8d490..719ba3f3c45c 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@
  * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block *may* be valid, false (zero)
  * if it is definitely invalid.
  *
- * User address space in Hexagon, like x86, goes to 0xbfffffff, so the
- * simple MSB-based tests used by MIPS won't work.  Some further
- * optimization is probably possible here, but for now, keep it
- * reasonably simple and not *too* slow.  After all, we've got the
- * MMU for backup.
  */
+#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
 
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) \
-	((get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg) || \
-	(((unsigned long)addr < get_fs().seg) && \
-	  (unsigned long)size < (get_fs().seg - (unsigned long)addr)))
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
+
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
+}
+#define __access_ok __access_ok
 
 /*
  * When a kernel-mode page fault is taken, the faulting instruction
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d2a8ef9f8978..5b6e0e7788f4 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -39,24 +39,13 @@
 
 # define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
 
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (!size)
-		goto ok;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	if ((get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr)) ||
-			(get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr + size - 1))) {
-		pr_devel("ACCESS fail at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-		return 0;
-	}
-ok:
-	pr_devel("ACCESS OK at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-	return 1;
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
+#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)addr, size)
 
 # define __FIXUP_SECTION	".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-- 
2.29.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org,
	bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
	green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
	deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
	x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok()
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:34:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214163452.1568807-2-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Three architectures check the end of a user access against the
address limit without taking a possible overflow into account.
Passing a negative length or another overflow in here returns
success when it should not.

Use the most common correct implementation here, which optimizes
for a constant 'size' argument, and turns the common case into a
single comparison.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da551281947c ("csky: User access")
Fixes: f663b60f5215 ("microblaze: Fix uaccess_ok macro")
Fixes: 7567746e1c0d ("Hexagon: Add user access functions")
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  7 +++----
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 18 +++++++++---------
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 19 ++++---------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c40f06ee8d3e..ac5a54f57d40 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 #define __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? KERNEL_DS.seg : get_fs().seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
 static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	return ((addr < limit) && ((addr + size) < limit));
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
 #define __access_ok __access_ok
 
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ef5bfef8d490..719ba3f3c45c 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@
  * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block *may* be valid, false (zero)
  * if it is definitely invalid.
  *
- * User address space in Hexagon, like x86, goes to 0xbfffffff, so the
- * simple MSB-based tests used by MIPS won't work.  Some further
- * optimization is probably possible here, but for now, keep it
- * reasonably simple and not *too* slow.  After all, we've got the
- * MMU for backup.
  */
+#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg = KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
 
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) \
-	((get_fs().seg = KERNEL_DS.seg) || \
-	(((unsigned long)addr < get_fs().seg) && \
-	  (unsigned long)size < (get_fs().seg - (unsigned long)addr)))
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
+
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
+}
+#define __access_ok __access_ok
 
 /*
  * When a kernel-mode page fault is taken, the faulting instruction
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d2a8ef9f8978..5b6e0e7788f4 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -39,24 +39,13 @@
 
 # define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg = KERNEL_DS.seg)
 
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (!size)
-		goto ok;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	if ((get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr)) ||
-			(get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr + size - 1))) {
-		pr_devel("ACCESS fail at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-		return 0;
-	}
-ok:
-	pr_devel("ACCESS OK at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-	return 1;
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
+#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)addr, size)
 
 # define __FIXUP_SECTION	".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-- 
2.29.2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org,
	bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
	green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
	deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
	x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok()
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:34:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214163452.1568807-2-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Three architectures check the end of a user access against the
address limit without taking a possible overflow into account.
Passing a negative length or another overflow in here returns
success when it should not.

Use the most common correct implementation here, which optimizes
for a constant 'size' argument, and turns the common case into a
single comparison.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da551281947c ("csky: User access")
Fixes: f663b60f5215 ("microblaze: Fix uaccess_ok macro")
Fixes: 7567746e1c0d ("Hexagon: Add user access functions")
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  7 +++----
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 18 +++++++++---------
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 19 ++++---------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c40f06ee8d3e..ac5a54f57d40 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 #define __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? KERNEL_DS.seg : get_fs().seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
 static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	return ((addr < limit) && ((addr + size) < limit));
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
 #define __access_ok __access_ok
 
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ef5bfef8d490..719ba3f3c45c 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@
  * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block *may* be valid, false (zero)
  * if it is definitely invalid.
  *
- * User address space in Hexagon, like x86, goes to 0xbfffffff, so the
- * simple MSB-based tests used by MIPS won't work.  Some further
- * optimization is probably possible here, but for now, keep it
- * reasonably simple and not *too* slow.  After all, we've got the
- * MMU for backup.
  */
+#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
 
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) \
-	((get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg) || \
-	(((unsigned long)addr < get_fs().seg) && \
-	  (unsigned long)size < (get_fs().seg - (unsigned long)addr)))
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
+
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
+}
+#define __access_ok __access_ok
 
 /*
  * When a kernel-mode page fault is taken, the faulting instruction
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d2a8ef9f8978..5b6e0e7788f4 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -39,24 +39,13 @@
 
 # define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
 
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (!size)
-		goto ok;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	if ((get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr)) ||
-			(get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr + size - 1))) {
-		pr_devel("ACCESS fail at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-		return 0;
-	}
-ok:
-	pr_devel("ACCESS OK at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-	return 1;
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
+#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)addr, size)
 
 # define __FIXUP_SECTION	".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org,
	bcain@codeaurora.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
	green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
	deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
	x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok()
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:34:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214163452.1568807-2-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Three architectures check the end of a user access against the
address limit without taking a possible overflow into account.
Passing a negative length or another overflow in here returns
success when it should not.

Use the most common correct implementation here, which optimizes
for a constant 'size' argument, and turns the common case into a
single comparison.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da551281947c ("csky: User access")
Fixes: f663b60f5215 ("microblaze: Fix uaccess_ok macro")
Fixes: 7567746e1c0d ("Hexagon: Add user access functions")
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  7 +++----
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 18 +++++++++---------
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 19 ++++---------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c40f06ee8d3e..ac5a54f57d40 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 #define __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? KERNEL_DS.seg : get_fs().seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
 static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	return ((addr < limit) && ((addr + size) < limit));
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
 #define __access_ok __access_ok
 
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ef5bfef8d490..719ba3f3c45c 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@
  * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block *may* be valid, false (zero)
  * if it is definitely invalid.
  *
- * User address space in Hexagon, like x86, goes to 0xbfffffff, so the
- * simple MSB-based tests used by MIPS won't work.  Some further
- * optimization is probably possible here, but for now, keep it
- * reasonably simple and not *too* slow.  After all, we've got the
- * MMU for backup.
  */
+#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
 
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) \
-	((get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg) || \
-	(((unsigned long)addr < get_fs().seg) && \
-	  (unsigned long)size < (get_fs().seg - (unsigned long)addr)))
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
+
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
+}
+#define __access_ok __access_ok
 
 /*
  * When a kernel-mode page fault is taken, the faulting instruction
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d2a8ef9f8978..5b6e0e7788f4 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -39,24 +39,13 @@
 
 # define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
 
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (!size)
-		goto ok;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	if ((get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr)) ||
-			(get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr + size - 1))) {
-		pr_devel("ACCESS fail at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-		return 0;
-	}
-ok:
-	pr_devel("ACCESS OK at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-	return 1;
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
+#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)addr, size)
 
 # define __FIXUP_SECTION	".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-- 
2.29.2


_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok()
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:34:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214163452.1568807-2-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Three architectures check the end of a user access against the
address limit without taking a possible overflow into account.
Passing a negative length or another overflow in here returns
success when it should not.

Use the most common correct implementation here, which optimizes
for a constant 'size' argument, and turns the common case into a
single comparison.

Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da551281947c ("csky: User access")
Fixes: f663b60f5215 ("microblaze: Fix uaccess_ok macro")
Fixes: 7567746e1c0d ("Hexagon: Add user access functions")
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  7 +++----
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 18 +++++++++---------
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 19 ++++---------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c40f06ee8d3e..ac5a54f57d40 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 #define __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? KERNEL_DS.seg : get_fs().seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
 static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	return ((addr < limit) && ((addr + size) < limit));
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
 #define __access_ok __access_ok
 
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ef5bfef8d490..719ba3f3c45c 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@
  * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block *may* be valid, false (zero)
  * if it is definitely invalid.
  *
- * User address space in Hexagon, like x86, goes to 0xbfffffff, so the
- * simple MSB-based tests used by MIPS won't work.  Some further
- * optimization is probably possible here, but for now, keep it
- * reasonably simple and not *too* slow.  After all, we've got the
- * MMU for backup.
  */
+#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
 
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) \
-	((get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg) || \
-	(((unsigned long)addr < get_fs().seg) && \
-	  (unsigned long)size < (get_fs().seg - (unsigned long)addr)))
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
+
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
+}
+#define __access_ok __access_ok
 
 /*
  * When a kernel-mode page fault is taken, the faulting instruction
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d2a8ef9f8978..5b6e0e7788f4 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -39,24 +39,13 @@
 
 # define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
 
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (!size)
-		goto ok;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	if ((get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr)) ||
-			(get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr + size - 1))) {
-		pr_devel("ACCESS fail at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-		return 0;
-	}
-ok:
-	pr_devel("ACCESS OK@0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-	return 1;
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
+#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)addr, size)
 
 # define __FIXUP_SECTION	".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-- 
2.29.2


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, dalias@libc.org,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, guoren@kernel.org,
	sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
	ardb@kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	bcain@codeaurora.org, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
	linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, hca@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, openrisc@lists.librecores.org,
	green.hu@gmail.com, shorne@gmail.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
	tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
	nickhu@andestech.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, dinguyen@kernel.org,
	David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	ebiederm@xmission.com, richard@nod.at, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok()
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:34:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220214163452.1568807-2-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd@kernel.org>

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Three architectures check the end of a user access against the
address limit without taking a possible overflow into account.
Passing a negative length or another overflow in here returns
success when it should not.

Use the most common correct implementation here, which optimizes
for a constant 'size' argument, and turns the common case into a
single comparison.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: da551281947c ("csky: User access")
Fixes: f663b60f5215 ("microblaze: Fix uaccess_ok macro")
Fixes: 7567746e1c0d ("Hexagon: Add user access functions")
Reported-by: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h       |  7 +++----
 arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h    | 18 +++++++++---------
 arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h | 19 ++++---------------
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
index c40f06ee8d3e..ac5a54f57d40 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -3,14 +3,13 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 #define __ASM_CSKY_UACCESS_H
 
-#define user_addr_max() \
-	(uaccess_kernel() ? KERNEL_DS.seg : get_fs().seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg)
 
 static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	unsigned long limit = current_thread_info()->addr_limit.seg;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	return ((addr < limit) && ((addr + size) < limit));
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
 #define __access_ok __access_ok
 
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
index ef5bfef8d490..719ba3f3c45c 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/hexagon/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@
  * Returns true (nonzero) if the memory block *may* be valid, false (zero)
  * if it is definitely invalid.
  *
- * User address space in Hexagon, like x86, goes to 0xbfffffff, so the
- * simple MSB-based tests used by MIPS won't work.  Some further
- * optimization is probably possible here, but for now, keep it
- * reasonably simple and not *too* slow.  After all, we've got the
- * MMU for backup.
  */
+#define uaccess_kernel() (get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
+#define user_addr_max() (uaccess_kernel() ? ~0UL : TASK_SIZE)
 
-#define __access_ok(addr, size) \
-	((get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg) || \
-	(((unsigned long)addr < get_fs().seg) && \
-	  (unsigned long)size < (get_fs().seg - (unsigned long)addr)))
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
+{
+	unsigned long limit = TASK_SIZE;
+
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
+}
+#define __access_ok __access_ok
 
 /*
  * When a kernel-mode page fault is taken, the faulting instruction
diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
index d2a8ef9f8978..5b6e0e7788f4 100644
--- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -39,24 +39,13 @@
 
 # define uaccess_kernel()	(get_fs().seg == KERNEL_DS.seg)
 
-static inline int access_ok(const void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
+static inline int __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
 {
-	if (!size)
-		goto ok;
+	unsigned long limit = user_addr_max();
 
-	if ((get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr)) ||
-			(get_fs().seg < ((unsigned long)addr + size - 1))) {
-		pr_devel("ACCESS fail at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-		return 0;
-	}
-ok:
-	pr_devel("ACCESS OK at 0x%08x (size 0x%x), seg 0x%08x\n",
-			(__force u32)addr, (u32)size,
-			(u32)get_fs().seg);
-	return 1;
+	return (size <= limit) && (addr <= (limit - size));
 }
+#define access_ok(addr, size) __access_ok((unsigned long)addr, size)
 
 # define __FIXUP_SECTION	".section .fixup,\"ax\"\n"
 # define __EX_TABLE_SECTION	".section __ex_table,\"a\"\n"
-- 
2.29.2


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-14 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 450+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-14 16:34 [PATCH 00/14] clean up asm/uaccess.h, kill set_fs for good Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58     ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get,put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get, put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get,put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 03/14] nds32: fix access_ok() checks in get/put_user Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01     ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:10     ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10       ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10       ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10       ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10       ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10       ` David Laight
2022-02-15  9:18     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:18       ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:25       ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25         ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25         ` [OpenRISC] " Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25         ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25         ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25         ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25         ` Greg KH
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 19:45     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45       ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 20:00       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00         ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:01       ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01         ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:17         ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17           ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17           ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17           ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17           ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17           ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  2:47           ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  2:47             ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  2:47             ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15  2:47             ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  2:47             ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  2:47             ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:24         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24           ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24           ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24           ` Linus Torvalds
     [not found]           ` <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 22:13             ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13               ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13               ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13               ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13               ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13               ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13               ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13               ` David Laight
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15  0:31   ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:31     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:31     ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:31     ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:31     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:31     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 13:16     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16       ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16       ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 06/14] mips: use simpler access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 07/14] uaccess: generalize access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:04   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04     ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]   ` <20220214163452.1568807-8-arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 17:15     ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15       ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15       ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15       ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15       ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15       ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 19:25       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25         ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:58   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58     ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 08/14] arm64: simplify access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 21:06   ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06     ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06     ` [OpenRISC] " Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06     ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06     ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06     ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06     ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-15  8:17   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  8:17     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  8:17     ` [OpenRISC] " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  8:17     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  8:17     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  8:17     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  8:17     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  9:12     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:12       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:12       ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:12       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:12       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:12       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:12       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:21       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  9:21         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  9:21         ` [OpenRISC] " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  9:21         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  9:21         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  9:21         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  9:21         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15  9:39         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:39           ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  9:39           ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]           ` <CAK8P3a0NTqK_m7q909d8FN6is8k4_u3zeckC9XOrjEi7kqSvmg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-15 10:39             ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39               ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39               ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39               ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39               ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39               ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37         ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37           ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37           ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37           ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37           ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37           ` Mark Rutland
     [not found]       ` <CAK8P3a2VfvDkueaJNTA9SiB+PFsi_Q17AX+aL46ueooW2ahmQw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-16 19:43         ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43           ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43           ` [OpenRISC] " Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43           ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43           ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43           ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43           ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43           ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-15  9:30     ` David Laight
2022-02-15  9:30       ` David Laight
2022-02-15  9:30       ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-15  9:30       ` David Laight
2022-02-15  9:30       ` David Laight
2022-02-15  9:30       ` David Laight
2022-02-15  9:30       ` David Laight
2022-02-15  9:30       ` David Laight
2022-02-15 11:24       ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24         ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24         ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24         ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24         ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24         ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24         ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07     ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  0:37   ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:37     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:37     ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:37     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:37     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:37     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  6:29     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15  6:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15  6:29       ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15  6:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15  6:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15  6:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15  6:29       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15  7:13       ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  7:13         ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  7:13         ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15  7:13         ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  7:13         ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  7:13         ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 10:02         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02           ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:28           ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28             ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28             ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28             ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28             ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28             ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28             ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28             ` David Laight
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 10/14] uaccess: remove most CONFIG_SET_FS users Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 19:40     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40       ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 11/14] sparc64: remove CONFIG_SET_FS support Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:06   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-16 13:06     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06       ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  0:48   ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:48     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:48     ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:48     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:48     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  0:48     ` Al Viro
2022-02-16 13:07     ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07       ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 12/14] sh: " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 13/14] ia64: " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 14/14] uaccess: drop set_fs leftovers Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34   ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  3:03   ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  3:03     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  3:03     ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15  3:03     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  3:03     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  3:03     ` Al Viro
2022-02-15  7:46     ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15  7:46       ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15  7:46       ` [OpenRISC] " Helge Deller
2022-02-15  7:46       ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15  7:46       ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15  7:46       ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15  7:46       ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15  8:10       ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  8:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  8:10         ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  8:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  8:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  8:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15  8:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found] ` <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 17:35   ` [PATCH 00/14] clean up asm/uaccess.h, kill set_fs for good Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35     ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35     ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220214163452.1568807-2-arnd@kernel.org \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcain@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=nickhu@andestech.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.