From: David Laight <David.Laight-ZS65k/vG3HxXrIkS9f7CXA@public.gmane.org>
To: 'Linus Torvalds'
<torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Rich Felker <dalias-8zAoT0mYgF4@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER"
<linux-mips-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-riscv
<linux-riscv-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Will Deacon <will-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..."
<linux-hexagon-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Helge Deller <deller-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers
<x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Russell
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 14 February 2022 20:24
> >
> > x86-64 has always(*) used TASK_SIZE_MAX for access_ok(), and the
> > get_user() assembler implementation does the same.
>
> Side note: we could just check the sign bit instead, and avoid big
> constants that way.
The cheap test for most 64bit is (addr | size) >> 62 != 0.
I did some tests last week and the compilers correctly optimise
out constant size.
Doesn't sparc64 still need a wrap test?
Or is that assumed because there is always an unmapped page
and transfer are 'adequately' done on increasing addresses?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brian Cain" <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" <linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 14 February 2022 20:24
> >
> > x86-64 has always(*) used TASK_SIZE_MAX for access_ok(), and the
> > get_user() assembler implementation does the same.
>
> Side note: we could just check the sign bit instead, and avoid big
> constants that way.
The cheap test for most 64bit is (addr | size) >> 62 != 0.
I did some tests last week and the compilers correctly optimise
out constant size.
Doesn't sparc64 still need a wrap test?
Or is that assumed because there is always an unmapped page
and transfer are 'adequately' done on increasing addresses?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" <linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
RnJvbTogTGludXMgVG9ydmFsZHMNCj4gU2VudDogMTQgRmVicnVhcnkgMjAyMiAyMDoyNA0KPiA+
DQo+ID4geDg2LTY0IGhhcyBhbHdheXMoKikgdXNlZCBUQVNLX1NJWkVfTUFYIGZvciBhY2Nlc3Nf
b2soKSwgYW5kIHRoZQ0KPiA+IGdldF91c2VyKCkgYXNzZW1ibGVyIGltcGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIGRv
ZXMgdGhlIHNhbWUuDQo+IA0KPiBTaWRlIG5vdGU6IHdlIGNvdWxkIGp1c3QgY2hlY2sgdGhlIHNp
Z24gYml0IGluc3RlYWQsIGFuZCBhdm9pZCBiaWcNCj4gY29uc3RhbnRzIHRoYXQgd2F5Lg0KDQpU
aGUgY2hlYXAgdGVzdCBmb3IgbW9zdCA2NGJpdCBpcyAoYWRkciB8IHNpemUpID4+IDYyICE9IDAu
DQoNCkkgZGlkIHNvbWUgdGVzdHMgbGFzdCB3ZWVrIGFuZCB0aGUgY29tcGlsZXJzIGNvcnJlY3Rs
eSBvcHRpbWlzZQ0Kb3V0IGNvbnN0YW50IHNpemUuDQoNCkRvZXNuJ3Qgc3BhcmM2NCBzdGlsbCBu
ZWVkIGEgd3JhcCB0ZXN0Pw0KT3IgaXMgdGhhdCBhc3N1bWVkIGJlY2F1c2UgdGhlcmUgaXMgYWx3
YXlzIGFuIHVubWFwcGVkIHBhZ2UNCmFuZCB0cmFuc2ZlciBhcmUgJ2FkZXF1YXRlbHknIGRvbmUg
b24gaW5jcmVhc2luZyBhZGRyZXNzZXM/DQoNCglEYXZpZA0KDQotDQpSZWdpc3RlcmVkIEFkZHJl
c3MgTGFrZXNpZGUsIEJyYW1sZXkgUm9hZCwgTW91bnQgRmFybSwgTWlsdG9uIEtleW5lcywgTUsx
IDFQVCwgVUsNClJlZ2lzdHJhdGlvbiBObzogMTM5NzM4NiAoV2FsZXMpDQo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brian Cain" <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" <linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 14 February 2022 20:24
> >
> > x86-64 has always(*) used TASK_SIZE_MAX for access_ok(), and the
> > get_user() assembler implementation does the same.
>
> Side note: we could just check the sign bit instead, and avoid big
> constants that way.
The cheap test for most 64bit is (addr | size) >> 62 != 0.
I did some tests last week and the compilers correctly optimise
out constant size.
Doesn't sparc64 still need a wrap test?
Or is that assumed because there is always an unmapped page
and transfer are 'adequately' done on increasing addresses?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brian Cain" <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" <linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT (xtensa)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 14 February 2022 20:24
> >
> > x86-64 has always(*) used TASK_SIZE_MAX for access_ok(), and the
> > get_user() assembler implementation does the same.
>
> Side note: we could just check the sign bit instead, and avoid big
> constants that way.
The cheap test for most 64bit is (addr | size) >> 62 != 0.
I did some tests last week and the compilers correctly optimise
out constant size.
Doesn't sparc64 still need a wrap test?
Or is that assumed because there is always an unmapped page
and transfer are 'adequately' done on increasing addresses?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Filippov" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"QUALCOMM HEXAGON... " <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" <linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT <linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Heiko Carstens (xtensa)" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
"Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer" <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen" <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 14 February 2022 20:24
> >
> > x86-64 has always(*) used TASK_SIZE_MAX for access_ok(), and the
> > get_user() assembler implementation does the same.
>
> Side note: we could just check the sign bit instead, and avoid big
> constants that way.
The cheap test for most 64bit is (addr | size) >> 62 != 0.
I did some tests last week and the compilers correctly optimise
out constant size.
Doesn't sparc64 still need a wrap test?
Or is that assumed because there is always an unmapped page
and transfer are 'adequately' done on increasing addresses?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 14 February 2022 20:24
> >
> > x86-64 has always(*) used TASK_SIZE_MAX for access_ok(), and the
> > get_user() assembler implementation does the same.
>
> Side note: we could just check the sign bit instead, and avoid big
> constants that way.
The cheap test for most 64bit is (addr | size) >> 62 != 0.
I did some tests last week and the compilers correctly optimise
out constant size.
Doesn't sparc64 still need a wrap test?
Or is that assumed because there is always an unmapped page
and transfer are 'adequately' done on increasing addresses?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Brian Cain <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"linux-csky@vger.kernel.org" <linux-csky@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:TENSILICA XTENSA PORT \(xtensa\)"
<linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
Openrisc <openrisc@lists.librecores.org>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@gmail.com>,
Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Hu <nickhu@andestech.com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@vger.kernel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 22:13:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Linus Torvalds
> Sent: 14 February 2022 20:24
> >
> > x86-64 has always(*) used TASK_SIZE_MAX for access_ok(), and the
> > get_user() assembler implementation does the same.
>
> Side note: we could just check the sign bit instead, and avoid big
> constants that way.
The cheap test for most 64bit is (addr | size) >> 62 != 0.
I did some tests last week and the compilers correctly optimise
out constant size.
Doesn't sparc64 still need a wrap test?
Or is that assumed because there is always an unmapped page
and transfer are 'adequately' done on increasing addresses?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-14 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 450+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 16:34 [PATCH 00/14] clean up asm/uaccess.h, kill set_fs for good Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get,put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get, put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get,put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 03/14] nds32: fix access_ok() checks in get/put_user Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` [OpenRISC] " Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight [this message]
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 0:31 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 06/14] mips: use simpler access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 07/14] uaccess: generalize access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20220214163452.1568807-8-arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 08/14] arm64: simplify access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` [OpenRISC] " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` [OpenRISC] " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a0NTqK_m7q909d8FN6is8k4_u3zeckC9XOrjEi7kqSvmg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a2VfvDkueaJNTA9SiB+PFsi_Q17AX+aL46ueooW2ahmQw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` [OpenRISC] " Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 10/14] uaccess: remove most CONFIG_SET_FS users Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 11/14] sparc64: remove CONFIG_SET_FS support Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 12/14] sh: " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 13/14] ia64: " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 14/14] uaccess: drop set_fs leftovers Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` [OpenRISC] " Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 17:35 ` [PATCH 00/14] clean up asm/uaccess.h, kill set_fs for good Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2dda07f893cb4ef9b5ea2265adccb98f@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight-zs65k/vg3hxxriks9f7cxa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ardb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bcain-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dalias-8zAoT0mYgF4@public.gmane.org \
--cc=deller-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org \
--cc=guoren-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jcmvbkbc-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-hexagon-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-ia64-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mips-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-riscv-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-s390-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sparclinux-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=will-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.