From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infrade
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok()
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215062942.GA12551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ygr11RGjj3C9uAUg@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:37:41AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Perhaps simply wrap that sucker into #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES
> (and trim the comment down to "coldfire and 68000 will pick generic
> variant")?
I wonder if we should invert CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE,
select the separate address space config for s390, sparc64, non-coldfire
m68k and mips with EVA and then just have one single access_ok for
overlapping address space (as added by Arnd) and non-overlapping ones
(always return true).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok()
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215062942.GA12551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ygr11RGjj3C9uAUg@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:37:41AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Perhaps simply wrap that sucker into #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES
> (and trim the comment down to "coldfire and 68000 will pick generic
> variant")?
I wonder if we should invert CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE,
select the separate address space config for s390, sparc64, non-coldfire
m68k and mips with EVA and then just have one single access_ok for
overlapping address space (as added by Arnd) and non-overlapping ones
(always return true).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok()
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 06:29:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215062942.GA12551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ygr11RGjj3C9uAUg@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:37:41AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Perhaps simply wrap that sucker into #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES
> (and trim the comment down to "coldfire and 68000 will pick generic
> variant")?
I wonder if we should invert CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE,
select the separate address space config for s390, sparc64, non-coldfire
m68k and mips with EVA and then just have one single access_ok for
overlapping address space (as added by Arnd) and non-overlapping ones
(always return true).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok()
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215062942.GA12551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ygr11RGjj3C9uAUg@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:37:41AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Perhaps simply wrap that sucker into #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES
> (and trim the comment down to "coldfire and 68000 will pick generic
> variant")?
I wonder if we should invert CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE,
select the separate address space config for s390, sparc64, non-coldfire
m68k and mips with EVA and then just have one single access_ok for
overlapping address space (as added by Arnd) and non-overlapping ones
(always return true).
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
will@kernel.org, guoren@kernel.org, bcain@codeaurora.org,
geert@linux-m68k.org, monstr@monstr.eu,
tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, nickhu@andestech.com,
green.hu@gmail.com, dinguyen@kernel.org, shorne@gmail.com,
deller@gmx.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com,
dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, richard@nod.at,
x86@kernel.org, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ardb@kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok()
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215062942.GA12551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ygr11RGjj3C9uAUg@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:37:41AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Perhaps simply wrap that sucker into #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES
> (and trim the comment down to "coldfire and 68000 will pick generic
> variant")?
I wonder if we should invert CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE,
select the separate address space config for s390, sparc64, non-coldfire
m68k and mips with EVA and then just have one single access_ok for
overlapping address space (as added by Arnd) and non-overlapping ones
(always return true).
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: openrisc@lists.librecores.org
Subject: [OpenRISC] [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok()
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215062942.GA12551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ygr11RGjj3C9uAUg@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:37:41AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Perhaps simply wrap that sucker into #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES
> (and trim the comment down to "coldfire and 68000 will pick generic
> variant")?
I wonder if we should invert CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE,
select the separate address space config for s390, sparc64, non-coldfire
m68k and mips with EVA and then just have one single access_ok for
overlapping address space (as added by Arnd) and non-overlapping ones
(always return true).
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, dalias@libc.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, guoren@kernel.org,
sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
bcain@codeaurora.org, deller@gmx.de, x86@kernel.org,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, linux-csky@vger.kernel.org,
ardb@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, geert@linux-m68k.org,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org,
linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, arnd@arndb.de, hca@linux.ibm.com,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
openrisc@lists.librecores.org, green.hu@gmail.com,
shorne@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
monstr@monstr.eu, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, nickhu@andestech.com,
jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dinguyen@kernel.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com, richard@nod.at, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok()
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 07:29:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215062942.GA12551@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ygr11RGjj3C9uAUg@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:37:41AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Perhaps simply wrap that sucker into #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_ADDRESS_SPACES
> (and trim the comment down to "coldfire and 68000 will pick generic
> variant")?
I wonder if we should invert CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE,
select the separate address space config for s390, sparc64, non-coldfire
m68k and mips with EVA and then just have one single access_ok for
overlapping address space (as added by Arnd) and non-overlapping ones
(always return true).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 6:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 450+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-14 16:34 [PATCH 00/14] clean up asm/uaccess.h, kill set_fs for good Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 01/14] uaccess: fix integer overflow on access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get,put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get, put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 02/14] sparc64: add __{get,put}_kernel_nocheck() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 03/14] nds32: fix access_ok() checks in get/put_user Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 17:10 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` [OpenRISC] " Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-15 10:25 ` Greg KH
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 04/14] x86: use more conventional access_ok() definition Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:17 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 2:47 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 20:24 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wgYu67OwP4LhcrPdDVxv2mOsx-Xsc2DKoVW6GZwKFtOYQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 22:13 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 0:31 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:31 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` [OpenRISC] [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get, put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` [PATCH 05/14] uaccess: add generic __{get,put}_kernel_nofault Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 06/14] mips: use simpler access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 07/14] uaccess: generalize access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20220214163452.1568807-8-arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 17:15 ` Al Viro
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:58 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 08/14] arm64: simplify access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-14 21:06 ` Robin Murphy
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` [OpenRISC] " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 8:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` [OpenRISC] " Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 9:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a0NTqK_m7q909d8FN6is8k4_u3zeckC9XOrjEi7kqSvmg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:39 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 10:37 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <CAK8P3a2VfvDkueaJNTA9SiB+PFsi_Q17AX+aL46ueooW2ahmQw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` [OpenRISC] " Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-16 19:43 ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 9:30 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:24 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` [OpenRISC] " Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-15 11:07 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 09/14] m68k: drop custom __access_ok() Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:37 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 6:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:13 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 10:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` [OpenRISC] " David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-15 13:28 ` David Laight
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 10/14] uaccess: remove most CONFIG_SET_FS users Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 19:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 11/14] sparc64: remove CONFIG_SET_FS support Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-14 17:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 0:48 ` Al Viro
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-16 13:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 12/14] sh: " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 13/14] ia64: " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [PATCH 14/14] uaccess: drop set_fs leftovers Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-14 16:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` [OpenRISC] " Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 3:03 ` Al Viro
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` [OpenRISC] " Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 7:46 ` Helge Deller
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` [OpenRISC] " Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-15 8:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
[not found] ` <20220214163452.1568807-1-arnd-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-14 17:35 ` [PATCH 00/14] clean up asm/uaccess.h, kill set_fs for good Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` [OpenRISC] " Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-14 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220215062942.GA12551@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bcain@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=green.hu@gmail.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infrade \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nickhu@andestech.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=shorne@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.