From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
sgarzare@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, shahafs@nvidia.com
Subject: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 01:30:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230405012723-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230405010657.612529-4-parav@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 04:06:50AM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Currently queue_notify_data register indicates the device
> internal queue notification identifier. This register is
> meaningful only when feature bit VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is
> negotiated.
>
> However, above register name often get confusing association with
> very similar feature bit VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA.
>
> When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature bit is negotiated,
> notification really involves sending additional queue progress
> related information (not queue identifier).
>
> Hence
> 1. to avoid any misunderstanding and association of
> queue_notify_data with similar name VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA,
>
> and
> 2. to reflect that queue_notify_data is the actual device
> internal vq identifier, rename it to queue_notify_id.
>
> Reflect vq identifier in the driver notification structure by renaming
> ambiguous vqn to vq_notify_id.
>
> The driver notification section assumes that queue notification contains
> vq index always. CONFIG_DATA feature bit introduction missed to
> update the driver notification section. Hence, correct it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
>
> ---
> Some side notes:
> renaming vqn to vqnd is even more confusing because data is really the
> queue identifier.
>
> And NOTIFICATION_DATA really contains queue progress info (data).
>
> (vqn - n is number or notification?, notification word in the
> notification structure does not make sense).
>
> Hence above renaming.
>
> ---
> changelog:
> v11->v12:
> - new patch
> ---
> content.tex | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> notifications-be.c | 2 +-
> notifications-le.c | 2 +-
> transport-pci.tex | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index cd93db2..d5f8026 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -405,8 +405,18 @@ \section{Driver Notifications} \label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device /
> notification to the device.
>
> When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated,
> -this notification involves sending the
> -virtqueue index to the device (method depending on the transport).
> +this notification involves sending only the 16-bit virtqueue notification
> +identifier (notification method depends on the transport).
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item When VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is not negotiated, virtqueue
> +notification identifier is a 16-bit vq index.
> +
> +\item When VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is negotiated, virtqueue
> +notification identifier is a device supplied virtqueue identifier. A method
> +to supply such virtqueue notification identifier is transport
> +specific.
> +\end{itemize}
>
> However, some devices benefit from the ability to find out the
> amount of available data in the queue without accessing the virtqueue in memory:
VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is such a narrow usecase, I don't like
burning "vq identifier" on this. How about we just say something
along the lines of:
When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, this
notification involves sending either the virtqueue index or the
virtqueue config data to the device (method depending on the
transport).
And then "the data sent is a device supplied virtqueue config data".
> @@ -417,7 +427,8 @@ \section{Driver Notifications} \label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device /
> the following information:
>
> \begin{description}
> -\item [vqn] VQ number to be notified.
> +\item [vq_notify_id] VQ notification identifier of a
> + corresponding virtqueue.
> \item [next_off] Offset
> within the ring where the next available ring entry
> will be written.
> diff --git a/notifications-be.c b/notifications-be.c
> index 5be947e..0a7cbf1 100644
> --- a/notifications-be.c
> +++ b/notifications-be.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> be32 {
> - vqn : 16;
> + vq_notify_id : 16; /* previously known as vqn */
> next_off : 15;
> next_wrap : 1;
> };
> diff --git a/notifications-le.c b/notifications-le.c
> index fe51267..6cca8fb 100644
> --- a/notifications-le.c
> +++ b/notifications-le.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> le32 {
> - vqn : 16;
> + vq_notify_id : 16; /* previously known as vqn */
> next_off : 15;
> next_wrap : 1;
> };
> diff --git a/transport-pci.tex b/transport-pci.tex
> index 5d98467..6bbf61c 100644
> --- a/transport-pci.tex
> +++ b/transport-pci.tex
> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> le64 queue_desc; /* read-write */
> le64 queue_driver; /* read-write */
> le64 queue_device; /* read-write */
> - le16 queue_notify_data; /* read-only for driver */
> + le16 queue_notify_id; /* read-only for driver */
> le16 queue_reset; /* read-write */
> };
> \end{lstlisting}
> @@ -388,17 +388,21 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> \item[\field{queue_device}]
> The driver writes the physical address of Device Area here. See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues}.
>
> -\item[\field{queue_notify_data}]
> +\item[\field{queue_notify_id}]
> This field exists only if VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA has been negotiated.
> - The driver will use this value to put it in the 'virtqueue number' field
> - in the available buffer notification structure.
> + The driver will use this value when driver sends available buffer
> + notification to the device.
> See section \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Available Buffer Notifications}.
> \begin{note}
> This field provides the device with flexibility to determine how virtqueues
> will be referred to in available buffer notifications.
> - In a trivial case the device can set \field{queue_notify_data}=vqn. Some devices
> - may benefit from providing another value, for example an internal virtqueue
> - identifier, or an internal offset related to the virtqueue number.
> + In a trivial case the device can set \field{queue_notify_id} to
> + vq index. Some devices may benefit from providing another value,
> + for example an internal virtqueue identifier, or an internal offset
> + related to the virtqueue index.
> + \end{note}
> + \begin{note}
> + This field is previously known as queue_notify_id.
> \end{note}
>
> \item[\field{queue_reset}]
> @@ -468,7 +472,7 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>
> \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Common configuration structure layout}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Common configuration structure layout}
>
> -The driver MUST NOT write to \field{device_feature}, \field{num_queues}, \field{config_generation}, \field{queue_notify_off} or \field{queue_notify_data}.
> +The driver MUST NOT write to \field{device_feature}, \field{num_queues}, \field{config_generation}, \field{queue_notify_off} or \field{queue_notify_id}.
>
> If VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED has been negotiated,
> the driver MUST NOT write the value 0 to \field{queue_size}.
> @@ -1053,9 +1057,9 @@ \subsubsection{Available Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Option
> If VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA has been negotiated:
> \begin{itemize}
> \item If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, the driver MUST use the
> -\field{queue_notify_data} value instead of the virtqueue index.
> +\field{queue_notify_id} value instead of the virtqueue index.
> \item If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated, the driver MUST set the
> -\field{vqn} field to the \field{queue_notify_data} value.
> +\field{vq_notify_id} field to the \field{queue_notify_id} value.
> \end{itemize}
>
> \subsubsection{Used Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Used Buffer Notifications}
> --
> 2.26.2
This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.
In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.
Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
Cc: virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, cohuck@redhat.com,
sgarzare@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, shahafs@nvidia.com
Subject: [virtio-dev] Re: [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 01:30:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230405012723-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230405010657.612529-4-parav@nvidia.com>
On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 04:06:50AM +0300, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Currently queue_notify_data register indicates the device
> internal queue notification identifier. This register is
> meaningful only when feature bit VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is
> negotiated.
>
> However, above register name often get confusing association with
> very similar feature bit VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA.
>
> When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA feature bit is negotiated,
> notification really involves sending additional queue progress
> related information (not queue identifier).
>
> Hence
> 1. to avoid any misunderstanding and association of
> queue_notify_data with similar name VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA,
>
> and
> 2. to reflect that queue_notify_data is the actual device
> internal vq identifier, rename it to queue_notify_id.
>
> Reflect vq identifier in the driver notification structure by renaming
> ambiguous vqn to vq_notify_id.
>
> The driver notification section assumes that queue notification contains
> vq index always. CONFIG_DATA feature bit introduction missed to
> update the driver notification section. Hence, correct it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
>
> ---
> Some side notes:
> renaming vqn to vqnd is even more confusing because data is really the
> queue identifier.
>
> And NOTIFICATION_DATA really contains queue progress info (data).
>
> (vqn - n is number or notification?, notification word in the
> notification structure does not make sense).
>
> Hence above renaming.
>
> ---
> changelog:
> v11->v12:
> - new patch
> ---
> content.tex | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> notifications-be.c | 2 +-
> notifications-le.c | 2 +-
> transport-pci.tex | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> index cd93db2..d5f8026 100644
> --- a/content.tex
> +++ b/content.tex
> @@ -405,8 +405,18 @@ \section{Driver Notifications} \label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device /
> notification to the device.
>
> When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated,
> -this notification involves sending the
> -virtqueue index to the device (method depending on the transport).
> +this notification involves sending only the 16-bit virtqueue notification
> +identifier (notification method depends on the transport).
> +
> +\begin{itemize}
> +\item When VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is not negotiated, virtqueue
> +notification identifier is a 16-bit vq index.
> +
> +\item When VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is negotiated, virtqueue
> +notification identifier is a device supplied virtqueue identifier. A method
> +to supply such virtqueue notification identifier is transport
> +specific.
> +\end{itemize}
>
> However, some devices benefit from the ability to find out the
> amount of available data in the queue without accessing the virtqueue in memory:
VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA is such a narrow usecase, I don't like
burning "vq identifier" on this. How about we just say something
along the lines of:
When VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, this
notification involves sending either the virtqueue index or the
virtqueue config data to the device (method depending on the
transport).
And then "the data sent is a device supplied virtqueue config data".
> @@ -417,7 +427,8 @@ \section{Driver Notifications} \label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device /
> the following information:
>
> \begin{description}
> -\item [vqn] VQ number to be notified.
> +\item [vq_notify_id] VQ notification identifier of a
> + corresponding virtqueue.
> \item [next_off] Offset
> within the ring where the next available ring entry
> will be written.
> diff --git a/notifications-be.c b/notifications-be.c
> index 5be947e..0a7cbf1 100644
> --- a/notifications-be.c
> +++ b/notifications-be.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> be32 {
> - vqn : 16;
> + vq_notify_id : 16; /* previously known as vqn */
> next_off : 15;
> next_wrap : 1;
> };
> diff --git a/notifications-le.c b/notifications-le.c
> index fe51267..6cca8fb 100644
> --- a/notifications-le.c
> +++ b/notifications-le.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> le32 {
> - vqn : 16;
> + vq_notify_id : 16; /* previously known as vqn */
> next_off : 15;
> next_wrap : 1;
> };
> diff --git a/transport-pci.tex b/transport-pci.tex
> index 5d98467..6bbf61c 100644
> --- a/transport-pci.tex
> +++ b/transport-pci.tex
> @@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> le64 queue_desc; /* read-write */
> le64 queue_driver; /* read-write */
> le64 queue_device; /* read-write */
> - le16 queue_notify_data; /* read-only for driver */
> + le16 queue_notify_id; /* read-only for driver */
> le16 queue_reset; /* read-write */
> };
> \end{lstlisting}
> @@ -388,17 +388,21 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
> \item[\field{queue_device}]
> The driver writes the physical address of Device Area here. See section \ref{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Virtqueues}.
>
> -\item[\field{queue_notify_data}]
> +\item[\field{queue_notify_id}]
> This field exists only if VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA has been negotiated.
> - The driver will use this value to put it in the 'virtqueue number' field
> - in the available buffer notification structure.
> + The driver will use this value when driver sends available buffer
> + notification to the device.
> See section \ref{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Available Buffer Notifications}.
> \begin{note}
> This field provides the device with flexibility to determine how virtqueues
> will be referred to in available buffer notifications.
> - In a trivial case the device can set \field{queue_notify_data}=vqn. Some devices
> - may benefit from providing another value, for example an internal virtqueue
> - identifier, or an internal offset related to the virtqueue number.
> + In a trivial case the device can set \field{queue_notify_id} to
> + vq index. Some devices may benefit from providing another value,
> + for example an internal virtqueue identifier, or an internal offset
> + related to the virtqueue index.
> + \end{note}
> + \begin{note}
> + This field is previously known as queue_notify_id.
> \end{note}
>
> \item[\field{queue_reset}]
> @@ -468,7 +472,7 @@ \subsubsection{Common configuration structure layout}\label{sec:Virtio Transport
>
> \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Common configuration structure layout}{Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI Device Layout / Common configuration structure layout}
>
> -The driver MUST NOT write to \field{device_feature}, \field{num_queues}, \field{config_generation}, \field{queue_notify_off} or \field{queue_notify_data}.
> +The driver MUST NOT write to \field{device_feature}, \field{num_queues}, \field{config_generation}, \field{queue_notify_off} or \field{queue_notify_id}.
>
> If VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED has been negotiated,
> the driver MUST NOT write the value 0 to \field{queue_size}.
> @@ -1053,9 +1057,9 @@ \subsubsection{Available Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Option
> If VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA has been negotiated:
> \begin{itemize}
> \item If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has not been negotiated, the driver MUST use the
> -\field{queue_notify_data} value instead of the virtqueue index.
> +\field{queue_notify_id} value instead of the virtqueue index.
> \item If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA has been negotiated, the driver MUST set the
> -\field{vqn} field to the \field{queue_notify_data} value.
> +\field{vq_notify_id} field to the \field{queue_notify_id} value.
> \end{itemize}
>
> \subsubsection{Used Buffer Notifications}\label{sec:Virtio Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device Operation / Used Buffer Notifications}
> --
> 2.26.2
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: virtio-dev-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: virtio-dev-help@lists.oasis-open.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 1:06 [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 00/10] Rename queue number to queue index Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 01/10] content: Add vq index text Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 5:26 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 5:26 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:00 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 13:00 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 9:18 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 9:18 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:03 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 13:03 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 11:30 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-07 11:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-07 15:34 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 15:34 ` Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 15:54 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-07 15:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 02/10] content.tex Replace virtqueue number with index Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 9:46 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2023-04-05 9:46 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 5:22 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 5:22 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:20 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 13:20 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-10 13:25 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-10 13:25 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 5:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-04-05 5:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 9:57 ` [virtio-comment] " Cornelia Huck
2023-04-05 9:57 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2023-04-05 13:21 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 13:21 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 15:27 ` [virtio-comment] " Halil Pasic
2023-04-05 15:27 ` Halil Pasic
2023-04-05 15:58 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 15:58 ` Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 11:43 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-07 11:43 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-11 8:56 ` Cornelia Huck
2023-04-11 8:56 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2023-04-11 13:35 ` Parav Pandit
2023-04-11 13:35 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-17 3:18 ` Halil Pasic
2023-04-17 3:18 ` [virtio-dev] " Halil Pasic
2023-04-17 7:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-17 7:04 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-17 8:47 ` [virtio-comment] Participation (was: Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names) Cornelia Huck
2023-04-17 8:47 ` [virtio-dev] " Cornelia Huck
2023-04-17 11:45 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-17 11:45 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-17 16:13 ` [virtio-comment] Re: [virtio-dev] Re: [virtio-comment] RE: [virtio-dev] RE: [PATCH v12 03/10] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names Halil Pasic
2023-04-17 16:13 ` Halil Pasic
2023-04-07 11:44 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-07 11:44 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 04/10] transport-pci: Avoid first vq index reference Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 05/10] transport-mmio: Rename QueueNum register Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 06/10] transport-mmio: Avoid referring to zero based index Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 07/10] transport-ccw: Rename queue depth/size to other transports Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 08/10] transport-ccw: Refer to the vq by its index Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 09/10] virtio-net: Avoid duplicate receive queue example Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-comment] [PATCH v12 10/10] virtio-net: Describe RSS using rss rq id Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 1:06 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 9:17 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 9:17 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:02 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 13:02 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-07 11:32 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-07 11:32 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 5:32 ` [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v12 00/10] Rename queue number to queue index Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 5:32 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:11 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 13:11 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 9:20 ` [virtio-comment] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 9:20 ` [virtio-dev] " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-04-05 13:05 ` [virtio-comment] " Parav Pandit
2023-04-05 13:05 ` [virtio-dev] " Parav Pandit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230405012723-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
--cc=virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org \
--cc=virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.