All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:54:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623185427.001CC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184201.1518871-14-oupton@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Hardware management of the dirty state (wi->hd) is incorrectly enabled for stage-1 even if hardware management of the access flag (wi->ha) is disabled.
- [Medium] The walk result's descriptor and dirty state are not updated after a successful hardware update, leading to spurious secondary faults.
--

commit bfdb5faf043bd9330372f7cd1a89affe2bb61b35
Author: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1

This commit updates the KVM ARM64 software page table walker to clear
the PTE_RDONLY bit in guest page tables when write access is permitted
and DBM (Dirty Bit Management) is enabled. This simulates hardware
management of the dirty state during stage-1 translation walks.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> index 0218176107b52..bfba31b270a95 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> @@ -412,6 +412,10 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
>  	wi->ha &= (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
>  		  FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_HA, tcr) :
>  		  FIELD_GET(TCR_HA, tcr));
> +	wi->hd  = kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, DBM);
> +	wi->hd &= (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
> +		  FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_HD, tcr) :
> +		  FIELD_GET(TCR_HD, tcr));

[Severity: High]
Does this code incorrectly enable hardware management of the dirty state (wi->hd)
when hardware management of the access flag (wi->ha) is disabled?

The ARM Architecture Reference Manual (D8.2.7) states that if HA is 0, HD is
effectively 0 and no hardware updates are permitted.

If a guest enables TCR_ELx.HD but leaves TCR_ELx.HA disabled, wi->hd evaluates
to true while wi->ha is false in setup_s1_walk(). Upon a write fault,
handle_desc_update() would clear PTE_RDONLY but skip setting PTE_AF, causing KVM
to inject an Access Flag fault despite having already modified the guest page
table to clear PTE_RDONLY.

>  
>  	return 0;

[ ... ]

> @@ -467,6 +487,9 @@ static int handle_desc_update(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
>  	if (wi->ha)
>  		new |= PTE_AF;
>  
> +	if (should_set_dirty_state(wi, ws, wr, access))
> +		new &= ~PTE_RDONLY;
> +
>  	if (new == old)
>  		return 0;

[Severity: Medium]
Are we failing to update the walk result (wr) after a successful hardware update?

When handle_desc_update() successfully clears PTE_RDONLY, it updates the
descriptor in guest memory and ws->desc, but wr->desc and wr->dirty are not
updated to reflect this change for walk_s1().

If kvm_translate_vncr() subsequently uses the stale wr.dirty == false, it maps
the VNCR page as PAGE_KERNEL_RO. When the guest retries the write, it triggers
a permission fault, forcing a second translation walk which then sees the updated
descriptor and maps it RW. Does this omission cause spurious secondary page
faults?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623184201.1518871-1-oupton@kernel.org?part=13

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-23 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17     ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260623185427.001CC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.