From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:57:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623185727.DB82D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184201.1518871-3-oupton@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but this patch silently fixes a critical pre-existing security vulnerability in nested KVM where stage-2 Execute-Never (XN) restrictions were ignored when the host lacks FEAT_XNX. The bug should be explicitly noted and split into a separate fix for stable backporting.
--
commit 60a1129130ae1d928ae1a5f97eb06ae059dacb1a
Author: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
Subject: KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions
This commit centralizes the computation of stage-2 permissions within the
table walk rather than inspecting the descriptor directly for execution
permissions.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
> @@ -129,34 +131,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_has_xnx(struct kvm *kvm)
>
> static inline bool kvm_s2_trans_exec_el0(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_trans *trans)
> {
> - u8 xn = FIELD_GET(KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN, trans->desc);
> -
> - if (!kvm_has_xnx(kvm))
> - xn &= FIELD_PREP(KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN, 0b10);
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
> @@ -241,6 +241,36 @@ static int swap_guest_s2_desc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t pa, u64 old, u6
> return __kvm_at_swap_desc(vcpu->kvm, pa, old, new);
> }
>
> +static void compute_s2_permissions(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s2_walk_info *wi,
> + struct s2_walk_step *ws, struct kvm_s2_trans *trans)
> +{
> + u8 s2ap = FIELD_GET(KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_LO_S2_S2AP, ws->desc);
> + u8 xn = FIELD_GET(KVM_PTE_LEAF_ATTR_HI_S2_XN, ws->desc);
> +
> + if (!kvm_has_xnx(vcpu->kvm))
> + xn &= 0b10;
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but this change silently fixes a regression
in nested virtualization isolation.
In the old code for kvm_s2_trans_exec_el0 and kvm_s2_trans_exec_el1, the
masking was done using FIELD_PREP. Because xn was a u8 and FIELD_PREP
returned a 64-bit value shifted by 53 bits, the bitwise AND always
evaluated to 0.
As a result, the check bypassed the L1 hypervisor's Execute-Never
restrictions entirely when the host lacked the hardware feature.
Since xn &= 0b10 correctly resolves this in the new compute_s2_permissions
function, does it make sense to split this specific correction into a
separate commit so it can be easily backported to stable trees?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623184201.1518871-1-oupton@kernel.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623185727.DB82D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.