From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>
Cc: "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 20:56:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623205652.DC4C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623184201.1518871-18-oupton@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] KVM incorrectly applies stage-1 Access Flag updates to table descriptors when hardware AF updates are globally disabled, causing spurious permission faults and bypassing nested stage-2 dirty tracking.
--
commit 3e7cbff07bcf9d864e2cd9a33c92f040a6496081
Author: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>
KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1
This commit implements access flag updates on table descriptors as required
by FEAT_HAFT. Note that unlike leaf descriptors, access flags on table
descriptors never generate a fault.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/at.c
> @@ -416,6 +416,8 @@ static int setup_s1_walk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct s1_walk_info *wi,
> wi->hd &= (wi->regime == TR_EL2 ?
> FIELD_GET(TCR_EL2_HD, tcr) :
> FIELD_GET(TCR_HD, tcr));
> + wi->haft = kvm_has_feat(vcpu->kvm, ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1, HAFDBS, HAFT) &&
> + FIELD_GET(TCR2_EL1_HAFT, effective_tcr2(vcpu, wi->regime));
[Severity: High]
Should wi->haft initialization be gated by wi->ha?
Per the ARM ARM, TCR2_ELx.HAFT is IGNORED if TCR_ELx.HA is 0. Because
wi->haft is evaluated independently of wi->ha here, the guest could configure
TCR_ELx.HA = 0 but TCR2_ELx.HAFT = 1.
[ ... ]
> @@ -465,7 +467,7 @@ static bool should_set_access_flag(struct s1_walk_info *wi, struct s1_walk_step
> if (access->type == WALK_ACCESS_NONARCH)
> return false;
>
> - return wi->ha;
> + return kvm_pte_table(ws->desc, ws->level) ? wi->haft : wi->ha;
> }
If the guest configures TCR_ELx.HA = 0 and TCR2_ELx.HAFT = 1, this will
return true for table descriptors even when hardware AF updates are disabled,
leading to spurious descriptor writes.
This can cause KVM to trigger stage-2 permission faults if the stage-2
mapping is read-only.
Furthermore, if the stage-2 mapping relies on hardware dirty state management
(DBM), KVM's nested stage-2 walk in walk_s1() treats the access as a read
because wi->ha is false:
arch/arm64/kvm/at.c:walk_s1() {
...
struct kvm_walk_access s2_access = {
.type = WALK_ACCESS_S1PTW,
.ia = ws.desc_ipa,
/*
* R_JCXVS, stage-2 dirty state can be updated
* for an S1PTW even if the stage-1 descriptor
* isn't updated.
*/
.write = wi->ha,
};
...
}
This will silently bypass the nested hypervisor's stage-2 dirty tracking
while still modifying the guest memory in host memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623184201.1518871-1-oupton@kernel.org?part=17
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-23 18:41 [PATCH 00/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Implement FEAT_HAFDBS, FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Introduce struct for stage-2 walk step Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Consolidate computation of stage-2 permissions Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Get rid of kvm_s2_trans*() accessors Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Only shadow writable-dirty guest descs as writable Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:05 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Pass an access descriptor for stage-2 walks Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Use a helper for stage-2 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set dirty state at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Treat DBM as writable " Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:08 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: arm64: Compute S1 permissions as part of s1_walk() Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: arm64: Plumb through access descriptor for stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: arm64: Use a struct for stage-1 walk context Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: arm64: Create helper for stage-1 descriptor updates Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: arm64: Set dirty state at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: arm64: Grant write permission when DBM is set at S1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: arm64: Don't update descriptors for "non-arch" access Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFDBS Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: arm64: Set Access flag on table descriptors at stage-1 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 20:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Set access flag on table descriptors at stage-2 Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:14 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: arm64: nv: Expose FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 18:41 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Only test AF behavior for emulated AT insns Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: arm64: selftests: Test AT emulation for FEAT_HAFT Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 19:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 20:17 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-23 18:42 ` [PATCH 22/22] HACK: KVM: arm64: nv: Set the dirty state for CMOs that fetch for write Oliver Upton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623205652.DC4C71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.