All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
	Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
	Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
	Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v9 10/24] perf/x86/intel: Consolidate PMU capability updates
Date: Mon,  6 Jul 2026 09:54:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706015439.3040804-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706015439.3040804-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

Currently, the PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS capability is set in two
different places: intel_ds_pebs_init() and __intel_update_pmu_caps()
for adaptive and architectural PEBS. The upcoming XSAVES-based SIMD
register sampling will also require setting and validating this
capability. Managing it across multiple locations introduces
unnecessary complexity and potential conflicts.

To centralize and simplify the PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS logic,
consolidate its initialization into a single helper function,
__intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(), handling both adaptive and
architectural PEBS.

Additionally, optimize the capability update paths by moving the
initialization of intel_cap.capabilities out of the update_pmu_cap()
helper. The helper is guarded by archPerfmonExt support, whereas
intel_cap.capabilities is independent of it.

Finally, introduce a new wrapper function, intel_update_pmu_caps(),
to cleanly encapsulate all these PMU capability updates.

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c   |  1 -
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 2e658b4bc83a..11a0c4dd2026 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -6143,19 +6143,27 @@ static void intel_pmu_check_extra_regs(struct extra_reg *extra_regs);
 
 static inline bool intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap(void)
 {
-	/* The Perf Metric (Bit 15) is always cleared */
-	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_METEORLAKE ||
+	/*
+	 * The Perf Metric (Bit 15) is always cleared on P-core of
+	 * PRL and MTL. Details can be found in RPL018 Errata Details.
+	 */
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_RAPTORLAKE ||
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_P ||
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_RAPTORLAKE_S ||
+	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_METEORLAKE ||
 	    boot_cpu_data.x86_vfm == INTEL_METEORLAKE_L)
 		return true;
 
 	return false;
 }
 
-static inline void __intel_update_pmu_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
+static inline void __intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
 	struct pmu *dest_pmu = pmu ? pmu : x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id());
+	u64 caps = hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).caps;
 
-	if (hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).caps & ARCH_PEBS_VECR_XMM)
+	if ((x86_pmu.arch_pebs && (caps & ARCH_PEBS_VECR_XMM)) ||
+	    (x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 4 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_baseline))
 		dest_pmu->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS;
 }
 
@@ -6179,7 +6187,7 @@ static inline void __intel_update_large_pebs_flags(struct pmu *pmu)
 
 #define counter_mask(_gp, _fixed) ((_gp) | ((u64)(_fixed) << INTEL_PMC_IDX_FIXED))
 
-static void update_pmu_cap(struct pmu *pmu)
+static void update_pmu_cap_from_perfmonext(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
 	unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 	union cpuid35_eax eax_0;
@@ -6227,21 +6235,34 @@ static void update_pmu_cap(struct pmu *pmu)
 		hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).counters = pebs_mask;
 		hybrid(pmu, arch_pebs_cap).pdists = pdists_mask;
 
-		if (WARN_ON((pebs_mask | pdists_mask) & ~cntrs_mask)) {
+		if (WARN_ON((pebs_mask | pdists_mask) & ~cntrs_mask))
 			x86_pmu.arch_pebs = 0;
-		} else {
-			__intel_update_pmu_caps(pmu);
+		else
 			__intel_update_large_pebs_flags(pmu);
-		}
 	} else {
 		WARN_ON(x86_pmu.arch_pebs == 1);
 		x86_pmu.arch_pebs = 0;
 	}
+}
 
-	if (!intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap()) {
-		/* Perf Metric (Bit 15) and PEBS via PT (Bit 16) are hybrid enumeration */
-		rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, hybrid(pmu, intel_cap).capabilities);
+static void intel_update_pmu_caps(struct pmu *pmu)
+{
+	if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON_EXT))
+		update_pmu_cap_from_perfmonext(pmu);
+
+	if (is_hybrid() && this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM)) {
+		rdmsrq(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES,
+		       hybrid(pmu, intel_cap).capabilities);
+
+		/*
+		 * Restore perf_metrics on platforms with broken
+		 * perf_capablities.
+		 */
+		if (intel_pmu_broken_perf_cap() &&
+		    hybrid_pmu(pmu)->pmu_type == hybrid_big)
+			hybrid(pmu, intel_cap).perf_metrics = 1;
 	}
+	__intel_update_pmu_xregs_caps(pmu);
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(struct x86_hybrid_pmu *pmu)
@@ -6325,8 +6346,7 @@ static bool init_hybrid_pmu(int cpu)
 	if (!cpumask_empty(&pmu->supported_cpus))
 		goto end;
 
-	if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON_EXT))
-		update_pmu_cap(&pmu->pmu);
+	intel_update_pmu_caps(&pmu->pmu);
 
 	intel_pmu_check_hybrid_pmus(pmu);
 
@@ -6395,8 +6415,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_cpu_starting(int cpu)
 		}
 	}
 
-	__intel_update_pmu_caps(cpuc->pmu);
-
 	if (!cpuc->shared_regs)
 		return;
 
@@ -8821,8 +8839,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 	 * from the leaf 0xa. The core specific update will be done later
 	 * when a new type is online.
 	 */
-	if (!is_hybrid() && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_PERFMON_EXT))
-		update_pmu_cap(NULL);
+	if (!is_hybrid())
+		intel_update_pmu_caps(NULL);
 
 	if (x86_pmu.arch_pebs) {
 		static_call_update(intel_pmu_disable_event_ext,
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
index 7b69f8c8d0c2..78b9c0dcb14d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/ds.c
@@ -3396,7 +3396,6 @@ static void __init intel_ds_pebs_init(void)
 				x86_pmu.flags |= PMU_FL_PEBS_ALL;
 				x86_pmu.pebs_capable = ~0ULL;
 				pebs_qual = "-baseline";
-				x86_get_pmu(smp_processor_id())->capabilities |= PERF_PMU_CAP_EXTENDED_REGS;
 			} else {
 				/* Only basic record supported */
 				x86_pmu.large_pebs_flags &=
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  2:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  1:54 [Patch v9 00/24] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 01/24] perf/x86: Fix two error-path and hybrid PMU guard issues Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:05     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 02/24] perf/x86: Move hybrid PMU initialization before x86_pmu_starting_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:33     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 03/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 04/24] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 05/24] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific function definitions Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 06/24] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in NMI handlers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  8:43     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 07/24] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:09     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 08/24] x86/fpu: Add update_fpu_state_and_flag() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:15     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 09/24] perf: Move and enhance has_extended_regs() for arch-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 11/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for non-PEBS events Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06  9:47     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 12/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07  9:59     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-08  0:56       ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 13/24] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08  1:13     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 14/24] perf/x86: Support XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  6:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08  1:27     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 15/24] perf/x86: Support YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 16/24] perf/x86: Support ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 17/24] perf/x86: Support OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 18/24] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 19/24] perf/x86: Support eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 20/24] perf/x86: Support SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 21/24] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 22/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  2:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08  1:51     ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 23/24] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  1:54 ` [Patch v9 24/24] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06  5:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08  2:03     ` Mi, Dapeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260706015439.3040804-11-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
    --cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
    --cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.