From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [Patch v9 05/24] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific function definitions
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 09:54:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706015439.3040804-6-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706015439.3040804-1-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Define default common __weak functions for perf_reg_value(),
perf_reg_validate(), perf_reg_abi() and perf_get_regs_user(). This helps
to eliminate the duplicated arch-specific definitions.
No function changes intended.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ------
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ------
arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ------
arch/loongarch/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ------
arch/mips/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ------
arch/parisc/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ------
arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ------
arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c | 6 ------
include/linux/perf_regs.h | 32 ++++++-------------------------
kernel/events/core.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
10 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 0529f90395c9..d575a4c3ca56 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -31,9 +31,3 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32;
}
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
index b4eece3eb17d..70e2f13f587f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -98,9 +98,3 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
}
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
diff --git a/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 09b7f88a2d6a..94601f37b596 100644
--- a/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/csky/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -31,9 +31,3 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32;
}
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 263ac4ab5af6..8dd604f01745 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -45,9 +45,3 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
return regs->regs[idx];
}
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_regs.c
index e686780d1647..7736d3c5ebd2 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -60,9 +60,3 @@ u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
return (s64)v; /* Sign extend if 32-bit. */
}
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 10a1a5f06a18..b9fe1f2fcb9b 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -53,9 +53,3 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64;
}
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
index fd304a248de6..3bba8deababb 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -35,9 +35,3 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
#endif
}
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index 624703af80a1..81204cb7f723 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -100,12 +100,6 @@ u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32;
}
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
#else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
#define REG_NOSUPPORT ((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_DS) | \
(1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_ES) | \
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_regs.h b/include/linux/perf_regs.h
index f632c5725f16..144bcc3ff19f 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_regs.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_regs.h
@@ -9,6 +9,12 @@ struct perf_regs {
struct pt_regs *regs;
};
+u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx);
+int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask);
+u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task);
+void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
+ struct pt_regs *regs);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_PERF_REGS
#include <asm/perf_regs.h>
@@ -16,35 +22,9 @@ struct perf_regs {
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
#endif
-u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx);
-int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask);
-u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task);
-void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs);
#else
#define PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK 0
-static inline u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
-{
- return mask ? -ENOSYS : 0;
-}
-
-static inline u64 perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
-{
- return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE;
-}
-
-static inline void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
- struct pt_regs *regs)
-{
- regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
- regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
-}
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_PERF_REGS */
#endif /* _LINUX_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 0f29d17a600d..82009bfb4fd9 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -7807,6 +7807,28 @@ unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct perf_event *event,
0 : perf_arch_instruction_pointer(regs);
}
+u64 __weak perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int __weak perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
+{
+ return mask ? -ENOSYS : 0;
+}
+
+u64 __weak perf_reg_abi(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ return PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_NONE;
+}
+
+void __weak perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
+ struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ regs_user->regs = task_pt_regs(current);
+ regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
+}
+
static void
perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
struct pt_regs *regs, u64 mask)
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 1:54 [Patch v9 00/24] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 01/24] perf/x86: Fix two error-path and hybrid PMU guard issues Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:05 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 02/24] perf/x86: Move hybrid PMU initialization before x86_pmu_starting_cpu() Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:33 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 03/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 04/24] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` Dapeng Mi [this message]
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 06/24] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in NMI handlers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:43 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 07/24] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 9:09 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 08/24] x86/fpu: Add update_fpu_state_and_flag() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 9:15 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 09/24] perf: Move and enhance has_extended_regs() for arch-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 10/24] perf/x86/intel: Consolidate PMU capability updates Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 11/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for non-PEBS events Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 9:47 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 12/24] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 9:59 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-08 0:56 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 13/24] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 1:13 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 14/24] perf/x86: Support XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 6:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 1:27 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 15/24] perf/x86: Support YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 16/24] perf/x86: Support ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 17/24] perf/x86: Support OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 18/24] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 19/24] perf/x86: Support eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 20/24] perf/x86: Support SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 21/24] perf/x86/intel: Support arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 22/24] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 2:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 1:51 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 23/24] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 1:54 ` [Patch v9 24/24] perf/x86/intel: Add sanity check for PEBS fragment size Dapeng Mi
2026-07-06 5:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 2:03 ` Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260706015439.3040804-6-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.