From: fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com
To: tomasz.jeznach@linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
jroedel@suse.de, zong.li@sifive.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
anup@brainfault.org, jgg@nvidia.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
kevin.tian@intel.com, atish.patra@linux.dev, skhawaja@google.com,
vasant.hegde@amd.com, joerg.roedel@amd.com,
tanchi25@mails.ucas.ac.cn, gong.shuai@sanechips.com.cn
Cc: fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com, guoren@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Nutty Liu <nutty.liu@hotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/10] iommu/riscv: use data structure instead of individual values
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:30:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261031083014.15040-5-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031083014.15040-1-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com>
From: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
The parameter will be increased when we need to set up more
bit fields in the device context. Use a data structure to
wrap them up.
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Fangyu Yu <fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nutty Liu <nutty.liu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
index fbdca69c436e..918fce4aa8c4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iodir_iotinval(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
* interim translation faults.
*/
static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
- struct device *dev, u64 fsc, u64 ta)
+ struct device *dev, struct riscv_iommu_dc *new_dc)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_dc *dc;
@@ -1227,10 +1227,10 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
dc = riscv_iommu_get_dc(iommu, fwspec->ids[i]);
tc = READ_ONCE(dc->tc);
- tc |= ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
+ tc |= new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, fsc);
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, new_dc->fsc);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
/* Update device context, write TC.V as the last step. */
dma_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(dc->tc, tc);
@@ -1311,22 +1311,22 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_paging_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct pt_iommu_riscv_64_hw_info pt_info;
- u64 fsc, ta;
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
pt_iommu_riscv_64_hw_info(&domain->riscvpt, &pt_info);
if (!riscv_iommu_pt_supported(iommu, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode))
return -ENODEV;
- fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode) |
+ dc.fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode) |
FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_PPN, pt_info.ppn);
- ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
+ dc.ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
if (riscv_iommu_bond_link(domain, dev))
return -ENOMEM;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, fsc, ta);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = domain;
@@ -1401,9 +1401,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_blocking_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
/* Make device context invalid, translation requests will fault w/ #258 */
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, 0);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
@@ -1423,8 +1426,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_identity_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
+ dc.ta = RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
--
2.50.1
--
kvm-riscv mailing list
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com
To: tomasz.jeznach@linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
jroedel@suse.de, zong.li@sifive.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
anup@brainfault.org, jgg@nvidia.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
kevin.tian@intel.com, atish.patra@linux.dev, skhawaja@google.com,
vasant.hegde@amd.com, joerg.roedel@amd.com,
tanchi25@mails.ucas.ac.cn, gong.shuai@sanechips.com.cn
Cc: fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com, guoren@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Nutty Liu <nutty.liu@hotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/10] iommu/riscv: use data structure instead of individual values
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:30:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261031083014.15040-5-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031083014.15040-1-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com>
From: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
The parameter will be increased when we need to set up more
bit fields in the device context. Use a data structure to
wrap them up.
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Fangyu Yu <fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nutty Liu <nutty.liu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
index fbdca69c436e..918fce4aa8c4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iodir_iotinval(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
* interim translation faults.
*/
static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
- struct device *dev, u64 fsc, u64 ta)
+ struct device *dev, struct riscv_iommu_dc *new_dc)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_dc *dc;
@@ -1227,10 +1227,10 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
dc = riscv_iommu_get_dc(iommu, fwspec->ids[i]);
tc = READ_ONCE(dc->tc);
- tc |= ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
+ tc |= new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, fsc);
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, new_dc->fsc);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
/* Update device context, write TC.V as the last step. */
dma_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(dc->tc, tc);
@@ -1311,22 +1311,22 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_paging_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct pt_iommu_riscv_64_hw_info pt_info;
- u64 fsc, ta;
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
pt_iommu_riscv_64_hw_info(&domain->riscvpt, &pt_info);
if (!riscv_iommu_pt_supported(iommu, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode))
return -ENODEV;
- fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode) |
+ dc.fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode) |
FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_PPN, pt_info.ppn);
- ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
+ dc.ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
if (riscv_iommu_bond_link(domain, dev))
return -ENOMEM;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, fsc, ta);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = domain;
@@ -1401,9 +1401,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_blocking_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
/* Make device context invalid, translation requests will fault w/ #258 */
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, 0);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
@@ -1423,8 +1426,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_identity_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
+ dc.ta = RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
--
2.50.1
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com
To: tomasz.jeznach@linux.dev, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, pjw@kernel.org, palmer@dabbelt.com,
aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com,
jroedel@suse.de, zong.li@sifive.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
anup@brainfault.org, jgg@nvidia.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
kevin.tian@intel.com, atish.patra@linux.dev, skhawaja@google.com,
vasant.hegde@amd.com, joerg.roedel@amd.com,
tanchi25@mails.ucas.ac.cn, gong.shuai@sanechips.com.cn
Cc: fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com, guoren@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Nutty Liu <nutty.liu@hotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/10] iommu/riscv: use data structure instead of individual values
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:30:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261031083014.15040-5-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261031083014.15040-1-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com>
From: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
The parameter will be increased when we need to set up more
bit fields in the device context. Use a data structure to
wrap them up.
Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Fangyu Yu <fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Nutty Liu <nutty.liu@hotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
index fbdca69c436e..918fce4aa8c4 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c
@@ -1188,7 +1188,7 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iodir_iotinval(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
* interim translation faults.
*/
static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
- struct device *dev, u64 fsc, u64 ta)
+ struct device *dev, struct riscv_iommu_dc *new_dc)
{
struct iommu_fwspec *fwspec = dev_iommu_fwspec_get(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_dc *dc;
@@ -1227,10 +1227,10 @@ static void riscv_iommu_iodir_update(struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu,
for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
dc = riscv_iommu_get_dc(iommu, fwspec->ids[i]);
tc = READ_ONCE(dc->tc);
- tc |= ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
+ tc |= new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_DC_TC_V;
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, fsc);
- WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->fsc, new_dc->fsc);
+ WRITE_ONCE(dc->ta, new_dc->ta & RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID);
/* Update device context, write TC.V as the last step. */
dma_wmb();
WRITE_ONCE(dc->tc, tc);
@@ -1311,22 +1311,22 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_paging_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct pt_iommu_riscv_64_hw_info pt_info;
- u64 fsc, ta;
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
pt_iommu_riscv_64_hw_info(&domain->riscvpt, &pt_info);
if (!riscv_iommu_pt_supported(iommu, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode))
return -ENODEV;
- fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode) |
+ dc.fsc = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_MODE, pt_info.fsc_iosatp_mode) |
FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_FSC_PPN, pt_info.ppn);
- ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
+ dc.ta = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_PSCID, domain->pscid) |
RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
if (riscv_iommu_bond_link(domain, dev))
return -ENOMEM;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, fsc, ta);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = domain;
@@ -1401,9 +1401,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_blocking_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
/* Make device context invalid, translation requests will fault w/ #258 */
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, 0);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
@@ -1423,8 +1426,12 @@ static int riscv_iommu_attach_identity_domain(struct iommu_domain *iommu_domain,
{
struct riscv_iommu_device *iommu = dev_to_iommu(dev);
struct riscv_iommu_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct riscv_iommu_dc dc = {0};
+
+ dc.fsc = RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE;
+ dc.ta = RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V;
- riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, RISCV_IOMMU_FSC_BARE, RISCV_IOMMU_PC_TA_V);
+ riscv_iommu_iodir_update(iommu, dev, &dc);
riscv_iommu_bond_unlink(info->domain, dev);
info->domain = NULL;
--
2.50.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-31 8:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-31 8:30 [PATCH v6 00/10] iommu/riscv: Add hardware dirty tracking for second-stage domains fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] iommu/generic_pt: Fix the RISC-V supported feature mask fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] iommupt: Add RISC-V Second-stage (iohgatp) page table support fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] iommupt: Add RISC-V dirty tracking PTE ops fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu [this message]
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] iommu/riscv: use data structure instead of individual values fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] iommu/riscv: support GSCID and GVMA invalidation command fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] RISC-V: KVM: Enable KVM_VFIO interfaces on RISC-V arch fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] iommu/riscv: Add domain_alloc_paging_flags for second-stage domain fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] iommu/riscv: Pre-enable GADE for second-stage domains fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] iommu/riscv: Add dirty tracking support " fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-11-02 9:18 ` Gong Shuai
2026-11-02 9:18 ` Gong Shuai
2026-11-02 9:18 ` Gong Shuai
2026-11-02 13:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-02 13:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-02 13:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-02 13:21 ` fangyu.yu
2026-11-02 13:21 ` fangyu.yu
2026-11-02 13:21 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] iommu/riscv: Add IOTINVAL.GVMA invalidations fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
2026-10-31 8:30 ` fangyu.yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261031083014.15040-5-fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=fangyu.yu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gong.shuai@sanechips.com.cn \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joerg.roedel@amd.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nutty.liu@hotmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=tanchi25@mails.ucas.ac.cn \
--cc=tomasz.jeznach@linux.dev \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.