From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] basic support of interleaved reads
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:07:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <384926280.18488@ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
Message-ID: <20070720101124.600141268@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070720100740.106917381@mail.ustc.edu.cn
[-- Attachment #1: readahead-interleaved-reads.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3240 bytes --]
This is a simplified version of the pagecache context based readahead.
It handles the case of multiple threads reading on the same fd and invalidating
each others' readahead state. It does the trick by scanning the pagecache and
recovering the current read stream's readahead status.
The algorithm works in a opportunistic way, in that it do not try to detect
interleaved reads _actively_, which requires a probe into the page cache(which
means a little more overheads for random reads). It only tries to handle a
previously started sequential readahead whose state was overwritten by
another concurrent stream, and it can do this job pretty well.
Negative and positive examples(or what you can expect from it):
1) it cannot detect and serve perfect request-by-request interleaved reads
right:
time stream 1 stream 2
0 1
1 1001
2 2
3 1002
4 3
5 1003
6 4
7 1004
8 5
9 1005
Here no single readahead will be carried out.
2) However, if it's two concurrent reads by two threads, the chance of the
initial sequential readahead be started is huge. Once the first sequential
readahead is started for a stream, this patch will ensure that the readahead
window continues to rampup and won't be disturbed by other streams.
time stream 1 stream 2
0 1
1 2
2 1001
3 3
4 1002
5 1003
6 4
7 5
8 1004
9 6
10 1005
11 7
12 1006
13 1007
Here steam 1 will start a readahead at page 2, and stream 2 will start its
first readahead at page 1003. From then on the two streams will be served right.
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
---
mm/readahead.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1.orig/mm/readahead.c
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/mm/readahead.c
@@ -363,6 +363,29 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space
}
/*
+ * Hit a marked page without valid readahead state.
+ * E.g. interleaved reads.
+ * Query the pagecache for async_size, which normally equals to
+ * readahead size. Ramp it up and use it as the new readahead size.
+ */
+ if (hit_readahead_marker) {
+ pgoff_t start;
+
+ read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+ start = radix_tree_scan_hole(&mapping->page_tree, offset, max+1);
+ read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
+
+ if (!start || start - offset > max)
+ return 0;
+
+ ra->start = start;
+ ra->size = start - offset; /* old async_size */
+ ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max);
+ ra->async_size = ra->size;
+ goto readit;
+ }
+
+ /*
* It may be one of
* - first read on start of file
* - sequential cache miss
@@ -373,16 +396,6 @@ ondemand_readahead(struct address_space
ra->size = get_init_ra_size(req_size, max);
ra->async_size = ra->size > req_size ? ra->size - req_size : ra->size;
- /*
- * Hit on a marked page without valid readahead state.
- * E.g. interleaved reads.
- * Not knowing its readahead pos/size, bet on the minimal possible one.
- */
- if (hit_readahead_marker) {
- ra->start++;
- ra->size = get_next_ra_size(ra, max);
- }
-
readit:
return ra_submit(ra, mapping, filp);
}
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-20 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-20 10:07 [PATCH 0/6] readahead cleanups and interleaved readahead Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] compacting file_ra_state Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <p73y7hbux4d.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
2007-07-20 12:11 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 12:11 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <1184927207.20032.168.camel@twins>
2007-07-20 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-20 11:24 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 11:24 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] mmap read-around simplification Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] remove several readahead macros Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] remove the limit max_sectors_kb imposed on max_readahead_kb Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 11:07 ` Jens Axboe
2007-07-20 11:25 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 11:25 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] introduce radix_tree_scan_hole() Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-07-20 10:07 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
2007-07-20 10:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] basic support of interleaved reads Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=384926280.18488@ustc.edu.cn \
--to=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.