From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 17:53:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CFD36D9.931F6E1D@opersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CFB2A38.60242CBA@opersys.com> <20020604161001.K36@toy.ucw.cz>
I sent this earlier to Pavel, but it seems that it hasn't made it to
the LKML:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Pavel,
Pavel Machek wrote:
> > We have released the initial implementation of the Adeos nanokernel.
> > The following is a complete description of its background, its
> > implementation, its API, and its potential uses. Please also see the
> > press release (http://www.freesoftware.fsf.org/adeos/pr-2002-06-03.en.txt)
> > and the project's workspace (http://freesoftware.fsf.org/projects/adeos/).
> > The Adeos code is distributed under the GNU GPL.
>
> Sounds interesting...
Thanks.
> Also, unlike UML, kernels are not protected from each other.
True, if they do physical accesses in each other's areas there's a problem.
But we're assuming 2 things here:
1) You are using stable kernels.
2) See the next answer.
> So if your FreeBSD+Linux combination crashes, you do not know if Linux or
> FreeBSD caused it.
No one said that you can't have an early domain in the pipeline that
specifically deals with this
> This is same approach rtLinux takes, right?
No, Have you seen the explanation I provided earlier to Erik:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=102309926620900&w=2
Adeos is clearly different from anything that is part of the rtlinux patent.
Karim
===================================================
Karim Yaghmour
karim@opersys.com
Embedded and Real-Time Linux Expert
===================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-04 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 8:35 [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 8:46 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 8:56 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 9:14 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 9:52 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:05 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 10:12 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 10:33 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:38 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 11:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-03 9:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-04 19:29 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 2:40 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 13:51 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 14:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 15:37 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 17:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 18:06 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 18:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 19:13 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 19:40 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 21:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 21:22 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 21:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 8:52 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 10:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 14:03 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 16:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-06 8:34 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-08 13:50 ` john slee
2002-06-08 13:59 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-06 21:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-07 1:35 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 2:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 2:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 10:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-05 9:41 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-06-05 18:20 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 3:56 ` J Sloan
2002-06-05 4:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 7:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-05 11:15 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 12:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 11:11 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 16:55 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-04 16:10 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-04 19:59 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 21:53 ` Karim Yaghmour [this message]
2002-06-04 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-05 4:00 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-05 9:24 Martin.Knoblauch
2002-06-05 19:01 Paul Zimmerman
2002-06-05 19:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 20:17 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CFD36D9.931F6E1D@opersys.com \
--to=karim@opersys.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.