From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: "Peter Wächtler" <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de>
Cc: Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>,
Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 18:53:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E17G0Vy-0002Hx-00@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206051612170.2614-100000@waste.org> <E17Fuy2-0002Fa-00@starship> <3CFF6BAE.8080406@loewe-komp.de>
On Thursday 06 June 2002 16:03, Peter Wächtler wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 June 2002 10:52, Peter Wächtler wrote:
> > > LynxOS (now LynuxWorks) has some patents for priority based IO.
> >
> > Oh, more of those one-click realtime patents ;-) Do you have any
> > pointers?
>
> http://www.lynuxworks.com/products/whitepapers/patentedio.php3
>
> In the upper right corner you can see the patent number. Try
> a search for patent on this side.
This doesn't have anything to do with realtime prioritization of a block
driver. Anyway, I didn't go as far as looking at the claims, but from
the description on the web page it looks pretty feeble. It seems to be
concerned with management of priority of softirq handlers to avoid
priority inversion, with a rather slipshod definition of priority
inversion given on the page. I doubt RTAI has a lot to fear from this
patent, especially as the owner has hitched its cart to the Linux horse,
and likely realizes what a bad idea it is to apply cattle prods to said
horse.
--
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-06 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 8:35 [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 8:46 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 8:56 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 9:14 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 9:52 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:05 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 10:12 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 10:33 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:38 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 11:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-03 9:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-04 19:29 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 2:40 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 13:51 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 14:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 15:37 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 17:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 18:06 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 18:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 19:13 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 19:40 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 21:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 21:22 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 21:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 8:52 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 10:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 14:03 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 16:53 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2002-06-05 20:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-06 8:34 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-08 13:50 ` john slee
2002-06-08 13:59 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-06 21:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-07 1:35 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 2:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 2:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 10:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-05 9:41 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-06-05 18:20 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 3:56 ` J Sloan
2002-06-05 4:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 7:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-05 11:15 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 12:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 11:11 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 16:55 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-04 16:10 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-04 19:59 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 21:53 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-05 4:00 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-05 9:24 Martin.Knoblauch
2002-06-05 19:01 Paul Zimmerman
2002-06-05 19:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 20:17 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E17G0Vy-0002Hx-00@starship \
--to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
--cc=oxymoron@waste.org \
--cc=pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.