From: "Peter Wächtler" <pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron@waste.org>,
Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 16:03:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CFF6BAE.8080406@loewe-komp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206051612170.2614-100000@waste.org> <E17FikY-0001fL-00@starship> <3CFF22B2.5050004@loewe-komp.de> <E17Fuy2-0002Fa-00@starship>
Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Thursday 06 June 2002 10:52, Peter Wächtler wrote:
>
>>Daniel Phillips wrote:
>>
>>>Our current block queue design would benefit a lot from the kind of
>>>thinking that would be required to make it realtime.
>>>
>>You know that spinning disks do some recalibrations?
>>
>>Whatever marketing tries to imply with "realtime volumes" - the
>>technology only tries to make better promises (think of AV disks
>>for better sustained rate).
>>
>
> It's my impression that some do thermal recalibration and some don't:
>
> http://www.pctechguide.com/04disks.htm
> "recalibration"
>
>
> The need to turn in reliable performance for multimedia apps seems
> to have made thermal calibration a thing of the past, but thanks for
> raising the issue.
>
Ok, seems that I am a bit outdated (here) :-)
>
>>LynxOS (now LynuxWorks) has some patents for priority based IO.
>>
>
> Oh, more of those one-click realtime patents ;-) Do you have any
> pointers?
>
http://www.lynuxworks.com/products/whitepapers/patentedio.php3
In the upper right corner you can see the patent number. Try
a search for patent on this side.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-06 14:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-03 8:35 [ANNOUNCE] Adeos nanokernel for Linux kernel Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 8:46 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 8:56 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 9:14 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 9:52 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:05 ` Alessandro Rubini
2002-06-03 10:12 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 10:33 ` Erik Andersen
2002-06-03 10:38 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-03 11:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-03 9:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-04 19:29 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:20 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 2:40 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 2:57 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 13:51 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 14:25 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 15:37 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 17:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 18:06 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 18:26 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 19:13 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 19:40 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:51 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-05 21:45 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 21:22 ` Oliver Xymoron
2002-06-05 21:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 8:52 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-06 10:58 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-06 14:03 ` Peter Wächtler [this message]
2002-06-06 16:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 20:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-06 8:34 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-08 13:50 ` john slee
2002-06-08 13:59 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-06-06 21:21 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-07 1:35 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 2:42 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 2:48 ` Mark Mielke
2002-06-07 10:32 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-07 21:35 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-05 9:41 ` Ingo Oeser
2002-06-05 18:20 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 3:56 ` J Sloan
2002-06-05 4:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 7:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-06-05 11:15 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 12:56 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-06-05 11:11 ` Peter Wächtler
2002-06-05 16:55 ` Rob Landley
2002-06-04 16:10 ` Pavel Machek
2002-06-04 19:59 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 21:53 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-04 23:06 ` Alan Cox
2002-06-05 4:00 ` Daniel Phillips
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-05 9:24 Martin.Knoblauch
2002-06-05 19:01 Paul Zimmerman
2002-06-05 19:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2002-06-05 20:17 ` Daniel Phillips
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CFF6BAE.8080406@loewe-komp.de \
--to=pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
--cc=oxymoron@waste.org \
--cc=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.