* Re: Anyone up to benchmarking WinFS vs. Reiser4?
@ 2003-10-28 2:42 jw schultz
2003-10-28 7:29 ` Hans Reiser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: jw schultz @ 2003-10-28 2:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Reiser; +Cc: Reiserfs mail-list
Hans,
This is a semi-silly request under the category of polish.
Could you make the filesystem type name for reiserfs version
4 be shorter please? Seven chars or less so reiser4 or rfs4
would be good.
The reason i ask this is because as much as i like reiserfs
(v3) for local filesystems the fact that the fstype overflows
a tab makes documentation and /etc/fstab ugly or awkward do
edit. I know it is a minor nit to pick but it is still
annoying.
Not a member of the rieserfs mailing list but there is no
need to reply to me.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: jw@pegasys.ws
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Anyone up to benchmarking WinFS vs. Reiser4?
2003-10-28 2:42 Anyone up to benchmarking WinFS vs. Reiser4? jw schultz
@ 2003-10-28 7:29 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-28 7:33 ` (reiser4 name) " jw schultz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Reiser @ 2003-10-28 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jw schultz; +Cc: Reiserfs mail-list
You mount it as reiser4, which is why in writing documentation I get
torn between calling it ReiserFS V4 and Reiser4.
--
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* (reiser4 name) Re: Anyone up to benchmarking WinFS vs. Reiser4?
2003-10-28 7:29 ` Hans Reiser
@ 2003-10-28 7:33 ` jw schultz
2003-10-28 8:14 ` Hans Reiser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: jw schultz @ 2003-10-28 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hans Reiser; +Cc: Reiserfs mail-list
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:29:01AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> You mount it as reiser4, which is why in writing documentation I get
> torn between calling it ReiserFS V4 and Reiser4.
Whether the length was intentional or not, thanks.
Sorry about the subject line, sloppiness on my part.
--
________________________________________________________________
J.W. Schultz Pegasystems Technologies
email address: jw@pegasys.ws
Remember Cernan and Schmitt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: (reiser4 name) Re: Anyone up to benchmarking WinFS vs. Reiser4?
2003-10-28 7:33 ` (reiser4 name) " jw schultz
@ 2003-10-28 8:14 ` Hans Reiser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Hans Reiser @ 2003-10-28 8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jw schultz; +Cc: Reiserfs mail-list
jw schultz wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:29:01AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>>You mount it as reiser4, which is why in writing documentation I get
>>torn between calling it ReiserFS V4 and Reiser4.
>>
>>
>
>Whether the length was intentional or not, thanks.
>Sorry about the subject line, sloppiness on my part.
>
>
>
It was based on mailing list feedback that they knew it was an FS.
--
Hans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-28 8:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-28 2:42 Anyone up to benchmarking WinFS vs. Reiser4? jw schultz
2003-10-28 7:29 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-28 7:33 ` (reiser4 name) " jw schultz
2003-10-28 8:14 ` Hans Reiser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.