Re: [RFC] Towards a Modern Autofs

[Mike Waychison <Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2431 bytes --]

H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Tim Hockin wrote:
> 
>>On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:06:34PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
 >>
>>>
>>>First of all, I'll be blunt: namespaces currently provide zero benefit
>>>in Linux, and virtually noone uses them.  I have discussed this with
>>>Linus in the past, and neither one of us see namespaces as being worth
>>
>>Let's get rid of them, then.  Make life that much easier.
>>
> 
> 
> That's what the Linux community is doing, de facto.  The Linux userspace
> simply is not set up to handle namespaces, and the autofs daemon is no
> exception.  Consider such a simple thing as /etc/mtab - /proc/mounts
> which is necessary for most of the mount(8) functionality to work.  It
> doesn't support namespaces and really cannot be made to.
> 
> namespace support in Linux is at the best a far-off future goal.  It is
> one thing to put in infrastructure, especially since it has some other
> nice benefits; it's another thing to revamp all of userspace to use it;
> it's nowhere close and autofs is no exception.
> 

This is clearly not 'all of userspace'.  Autofs is an exception.  As is 
/etc/mtab.  The way I see it, automounting is a 'mount facility', as are 
namespaces.  The two should be made to work together.  Yes, mount(8) 
should probably be fixed one way or another as well due to /etc/mtab 
breakage. Why? Because it too is a mount facility.

There are a couple problems inherent with namespaces.  Most of these are 
mount facilities that are broken such as mentioned above.  They *should* 
be fixed to work nicely.

Other parts of userspace get confused with namespaces, eg: cron and atd. 
  These programs clearly need infrastructure added that somehow allows 
for arbitrary namespace joining/saving.  If you have suggestions for how 
we can solve this issue, please do let me know.  I'm stumped :\  I'd be 
more than happy to discuss this with you.

One not-so-far fetched approach would be to associate cron/at jobs with 
automount configurations so that a namespace can be re-constructed at 
runtime.


-- 
Mike Waychison
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1 (650) 352-5299 voice
1 (416) 202-8336 voice
mailto: Michael.Waychison@Sun.COM
http://www.sun.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
NOTICE:  The opinions expressed in this email are held by me,
and may not represent the views of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 251 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
autofs@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs